残疾或死亡:儿科神经外科知情同意书的重点综述

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nathan A. Shlobin , John Paul G. Kolcun , Brian D. Leland , Laurie L. Ackerman , Sandi K. Lam , Jeffrey S. Raskin
{"title":"残疾或死亡:儿科神经外科知情同意书的重点综述","authors":"Nathan A. Shlobin ,&nbsp;John Paul G. Kolcun ,&nbsp;Brian D. Leland ,&nbsp;Laurie L. Ackerman ,&nbsp;Sandi K. Lam ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Raskin","doi":"10.1016/j.spen.2022.101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The management of pediatric neurosurgical disease often requires families to choose between long-term disability and premature death. This decision-making is codified by informed consent. In practice, decision-making is heavily weighted toward intervening to prevent death, often with less consideration of the realities of long-term disability. We analyze long-term disability in pediatric neurosurgical disease from the perspectives of patients, families, and society. We then present a pragmatic framework and conversational approach for addressing informed consent discussions when the outcome is expected to be death or disability. We performed a focused review of literature regarding informed consent in pediatric neurosurgery by searching PubMed and Google Scholar with search terms including “pediatric neurosurgery,” “informed consent,” and “disability.” The literature was focused on patients with diagnoses including spina bifida, neuro-oncology, trauma, and hydrocephalus. Patient perspective elements were physical/mental disability, lack of autonomy, and role in community/society. The family perspective involves caregiver burden, emotional toll, and financial impact. Societal considerations include the availability of public resources for disabled children, large-scale financial cost, and impacts on global health. Practical conversational steps with patients/caregivers include opening the discussion, information provision and acknowledgement of uncertainty, assessment of understanding and clarifying questions, decision-making, and decision maintenance, all while remaining sensitive to the emotional burden commensurate with these decisions. The “death or disability” paradigm represents a common challenge to informed consent in pediatric neurosurgery. Patient, family, and societal factors that inform surrogate decisions vary and sometimes conflict. Pediatric neurosurgeons must use a comprehensive approach to address the informational and relational needs of caregivers during the informed consent process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49284,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Pediatric Neurology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 101030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability or Death: A Focused Review of Informed Consent in Pediatric Neurosurgery\",\"authors\":\"Nathan A. Shlobin ,&nbsp;John Paul G. Kolcun ,&nbsp;Brian D. Leland ,&nbsp;Laurie L. Ackerman ,&nbsp;Sandi K. Lam ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Raskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spen.2022.101030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The management of pediatric neurosurgical disease often requires families to choose between long-term disability and premature death. This decision-making is codified by informed consent. In practice, decision-making is heavily weighted toward intervening to prevent death, often with less consideration of the realities of long-term disability. We analyze long-term disability in pediatric neurosurgical disease from the perspectives of patients, families, and society. We then present a pragmatic framework and conversational approach for addressing informed consent discussions when the outcome is expected to be death or disability. We performed a focused review of literature regarding informed consent in pediatric neurosurgery by searching PubMed and Google Scholar with search terms including “pediatric neurosurgery,” “informed consent,” and “disability.” The literature was focused on patients with diagnoses including spina bifida, neuro-oncology, trauma, and hydrocephalus. Patient perspective elements were physical/mental disability, lack of autonomy, and role in community/society. The family perspective involves caregiver burden, emotional toll, and financial impact. Societal considerations include the availability of public resources for disabled children, large-scale financial cost, and impacts on global health. Practical conversational steps with patients/caregivers include opening the discussion, information provision and acknowledgement of uncertainty, assessment of understanding and clarifying questions, decision-making, and decision maintenance, all while remaining sensitive to the emotional burden commensurate with these decisions. The “death or disability” paradigm represents a common challenge to informed consent in pediatric neurosurgery. Patient, family, and societal factors that inform surrogate decisions vary and sometimes conflict. Pediatric neurosurgeons must use a comprehensive approach to address the informational and relational needs of caregivers during the informed consent process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Pediatric Neurology\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Pediatric Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107190912200078X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Pediatric Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107190912200078X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

小儿神经外科疾病的管理通常需要家庭在长期残疾和过早死亡之间做出选择。这种决策是以知情同意为依据的。在实践中,决策主要侧重于干预以防止死亡,通常很少考虑长期残疾的现实。我们从患者、家庭和社会的角度分析了小儿神经外科疾病的长期残疾。然后,当预期结果为死亡或残疾时,我们提出了一个务实的框架和对话方法来处理知情同意讨论。我们通过在PubMed和Google Scholar上搜索包括“儿科神经外科”、“知情同意书”和“残疾”在内的搜索词,对有关儿科神经外科知情同意书的文献进行了重点综述。这些文献主要针对脊柱裂、神经肿瘤学、创伤和脑积水等诊断的患者。患者视角因素包括身体/精神残疾、缺乏自主性以及在社区/社会中的角色。家庭观点涉及照顾者负担、情感损失和经济影响。社会考虑因素包括残疾儿童公共资源的可用性、大规模的财政成本以及对全球健康的影响。与患者/护理人员的实际对话步骤包括开始讨论、提供信息和承认不确定性、评估理解和澄清问题、决策和决策维护,同时对与这些决策相称的情绪负担保持敏感。“死亡或残疾”范式代表了儿科神经外科对知情同意的常见挑战。影响代孕决定的患者、家庭和社会因素各不相同,有时甚至会发生冲突。在知情同意过程中,儿科神经外科医生必须使用全面的方法来解决照顾者的信息和关系需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disability or Death: A Focused Review of Informed Consent in Pediatric Neurosurgery

The management of pediatric neurosurgical disease often requires families to choose between long-term disability and premature death. This decision-making is codified by informed consent. In practice, decision-making is heavily weighted toward intervening to prevent death, often with less consideration of the realities of long-term disability. We analyze long-term disability in pediatric neurosurgical disease from the perspectives of patients, families, and society. We then present a pragmatic framework and conversational approach for addressing informed consent discussions when the outcome is expected to be death or disability. We performed a focused review of literature regarding informed consent in pediatric neurosurgery by searching PubMed and Google Scholar with search terms including “pediatric neurosurgery,” “informed consent,” and “disability.” The literature was focused on patients with diagnoses including spina bifida, neuro-oncology, trauma, and hydrocephalus. Patient perspective elements were physical/mental disability, lack of autonomy, and role in community/society. The family perspective involves caregiver burden, emotional toll, and financial impact. Societal considerations include the availability of public resources for disabled children, large-scale financial cost, and impacts on global health. Practical conversational steps with patients/caregivers include opening the discussion, information provision and acknowledgement of uncertainty, assessment of understanding and clarifying questions, decision-making, and decision maintenance, all while remaining sensitive to the emotional burden commensurate with these decisions. The “death or disability” paradigm represents a common challenge to informed consent in pediatric neurosurgery. Patient, family, and societal factors that inform surrogate decisions vary and sometimes conflict. Pediatric neurosurgeons must use a comprehensive approach to address the informational and relational needs of caregivers during the informed consent process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Pediatric Neurology
Seminars in Pediatric Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Pediatric Neurology is a topical journal that focuses on subjects of current importance in the field of pediatric neurology. The journal is devoted to making the status of such topics and the results of new investigations readily available to the practicing physician. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology is of special interest to pediatric neurologists, pediatric neuropathologists, behavioral pediatricians, and neurologists who treat all ages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信