为什么社区力量是促进种族和健康平等的基础。

NAM perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.31478/202206b
Aditi Vaidya, Ai-Jen Poo, LaTosha Brown
{"title":"为什么社区力量是促进种族和健康平等的基础。","authors":"Aditi Vaidya, Ai-Jen Poo, LaTosha Brown","doi":"10.31478/202206b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health researchers, leaders in health care and public health, and funders have long valued the concept of community engagement, when residents authentically connect on issues or amplify their voices to drive policy decisions affecting the health and well-being of their community and neighbors. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) has funded past work at the National Academies to assess meaningful community engagement in health and health care programs (Organizing Committee, 2022). Until recently, leaders in health and health care, including RWJF, have been less familiar and less comfortable with the concept of community power and the fundamental role it plays in advancing racial and health equity and dismantling structures that perpetuate inequity. Powerlessness is a structural barrier, like racism and sexism, to advancing health equity. Power imbalances are at the root of the structural issues that produce an unfair and unequal distribution of the social, economic, and environmental benefits that influence health. Behind any crisis—whether democratic or related to housing, climate, or health—there is an imbalance in who holds and wields power. Different from community engagement, at the root of community power building are strategies to organize people most impacted by a problem. Evidence now shows that putting more power in the hands of more people, including those most impacted by structural inequities, results in systemic changes in the ways people make decisions that benefit all (Pastor et al., 2020). The authors of this manuscript know from our own work with mobilizing domestic workers, caregivers, and voters, and through work supported by RWJF, that community engagement is distinct from community power in multiple ways. First, campaigns to expand Medicaid and place moratoriums on evictions are examples of efforts that activate communities most impacted by structural inequiThis three-part series highlights learnings from Lead Local: Community-Driven Change and the Power of Collective Action, a collaborative effort funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation that convened well-respected local organizations and leaders in the fields of community organizing, advocacy, and research to examine the relationship between health and power building. Building on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Roundtable on Community Power in Population Health Improvement workshop in January 2021, priority areas for action are shared to make progress toward, and further an understanding of, community power building for health and racial equity.","PeriodicalId":74236,"journal":{"name":"NAM perspectives","volume":"2022 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9499376/pdf/nampsp-2022-202206b.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Community Power Is Fundamental to Advancing Racial and Health Equity.\",\"authors\":\"Aditi Vaidya, Ai-Jen Poo, LaTosha Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.31478/202206b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Health researchers, leaders in health care and public health, and funders have long valued the concept of community engagement, when residents authentically connect on issues or amplify their voices to drive policy decisions affecting the health and well-being of their community and neighbors. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) has funded past work at the National Academies to assess meaningful community engagement in health and health care programs (Organizing Committee, 2022). Until recently, leaders in health and health care, including RWJF, have been less familiar and less comfortable with the concept of community power and the fundamental role it plays in advancing racial and health equity and dismantling structures that perpetuate inequity. Powerlessness is a structural barrier, like racism and sexism, to advancing health equity. Power imbalances are at the root of the structural issues that produce an unfair and unequal distribution of the social, economic, and environmental benefits that influence health. Behind any crisis—whether democratic or related to housing, climate, or health—there is an imbalance in who holds and wields power. Different from community engagement, at the root of community power building are strategies to organize people most impacted by a problem. Evidence now shows that putting more power in the hands of more people, including those most impacted by structural inequities, results in systemic changes in the ways people make decisions that benefit all (Pastor et al., 2020). The authors of this manuscript know from our own work with mobilizing domestic workers, caregivers, and voters, and through work supported by RWJF, that community engagement is distinct from community power in multiple ways. First, campaigns to expand Medicaid and place moratoriums on evictions are examples of efforts that activate communities most impacted by structural inequiThis three-part series highlights learnings from Lead Local: Community-Driven Change and the Power of Collective Action, a collaborative effort funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation that convened well-respected local organizations and leaders in the fields of community organizing, advocacy, and research to examine the relationship between health and power building. Building on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Roundtable on Community Power in Population Health Improvement workshop in January 2021, priority areas for action are shared to make progress toward, and further an understanding of, community power building for health and racial equity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NAM perspectives\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9499376/pdf/nampsp-2022-202206b.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NAM perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31478/202206b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAM perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31478/202206b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Community Power Is Fundamental to Advancing Racial and Health Equity.
Health researchers, leaders in health care and public health, and funders have long valued the concept of community engagement, when residents authentically connect on issues or amplify their voices to drive policy decisions affecting the health and well-being of their community and neighbors. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) has funded past work at the National Academies to assess meaningful community engagement in health and health care programs (Organizing Committee, 2022). Until recently, leaders in health and health care, including RWJF, have been less familiar and less comfortable with the concept of community power and the fundamental role it plays in advancing racial and health equity and dismantling structures that perpetuate inequity. Powerlessness is a structural barrier, like racism and sexism, to advancing health equity. Power imbalances are at the root of the structural issues that produce an unfair and unequal distribution of the social, economic, and environmental benefits that influence health. Behind any crisis—whether democratic or related to housing, climate, or health—there is an imbalance in who holds and wields power. Different from community engagement, at the root of community power building are strategies to organize people most impacted by a problem. Evidence now shows that putting more power in the hands of more people, including those most impacted by structural inequities, results in systemic changes in the ways people make decisions that benefit all (Pastor et al., 2020). The authors of this manuscript know from our own work with mobilizing domestic workers, caregivers, and voters, and through work supported by RWJF, that community engagement is distinct from community power in multiple ways. First, campaigns to expand Medicaid and place moratoriums on evictions are examples of efforts that activate communities most impacted by structural inequiThis three-part series highlights learnings from Lead Local: Community-Driven Change and the Power of Collective Action, a collaborative effort funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation that convened well-respected local organizations and leaders in the fields of community organizing, advocacy, and research to examine the relationship between health and power building. Building on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Roundtable on Community Power in Population Health Improvement workshop in January 2021, priority areas for action are shared to make progress toward, and further an understanding of, community power building for health and racial equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信