社区药房的C反应蛋白护理点检测:一项北爱尔兰试点的观察研究。

IF 2.4 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Practice-Granada Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-10 DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2711
Katherine O'Neill, Glenda Fleming, Michael Scott, Gillian Plant, Sumanthra Varma
{"title":"社区药房的C反应蛋白护理点检测:一项北爱尔兰试点的观察研究。","authors":"Katherine O'Neill, Glenda Fleming, Michael Scott, Gillian Plant, Sumanthra Varma","doi":"10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether or not to prescribe an antibiotic is a key issue for clinicians treating respiratory tract infection (RTI) in the community. Measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) in community pharmacy may help to differentiate viral and self-limiting infections from more serious bacterial infections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To pilot POC CRP testing for suspected RTI within community pharmacy in Northern Ireland (NI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>POC CRP testing was piloted in 17 community pharmacies linked to 9 general practitioner (GP) practices in NI. The service was available to adults presenting to their community pharmacy with signs and symptoms of RTI. The pilot (between October 2019 and March 2020) was stopped early due to Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the pilot period, 328 patients from 9 GP practices completed a consultation. The majority (60%) were referred to the pharmacy from their GP and presented with <3 symptoms (55%) which had a duration of up to 1 week (36%). Most patients (72%) had a CRP result of <20mg/L. A larger proportion of patients with a CRP test result between 20mg/L and 100mg/L and >100mg/L, were referred to the GP when compared to patients with a CRP test result of <20mg/L. Antimicrobial prescribing rates were studied in a subgroup (n=30) from 1 practice. Whilst the majority (22/30; 73%) had a CRP test result of <20mg/L, 50%, (15/30) of patients had contact with the GP in relation to their acute cough and 43% (13/30) had an antibiotic prescribed within 5 days. The stakeholder and patient survey reported positive experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot was successful in introducing POC CRP testing in keeping with National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations for the assessment of non-pneumonic lower RTIs and both stakeholders and patients reported positive experiences. A larger proportion of patients with a possible or likely bacterial infection as measured by CRP were referred to the GP, compared to patients with a normal CRP test result. Although stopped early due to COVID-19, the outcomes provide an insight and learning for the implementation, scale up and optimization of POC CRP testing in community pharmacy in NI.</p>","PeriodicalId":51762,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","volume":"20 4","pages":"2711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/74/pharmpract-20-2711.PMC9891790.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C-reactive protein point of care testing in community pharmacy: Observational study of a Northern Ireland pilot.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine O'Neill, Glenda Fleming, Michael Scott, Gillian Plant, Sumanthra Varma\",\"doi\":\"10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether or not to prescribe an antibiotic is a key issue for clinicians treating respiratory tract infection (RTI) in the community. Measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) in community pharmacy may help to differentiate viral and self-limiting infections from more serious bacterial infections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To pilot POC CRP testing for suspected RTI within community pharmacy in Northern Ireland (NI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>POC CRP testing was piloted in 17 community pharmacies linked to 9 general practitioner (GP) practices in NI. The service was available to adults presenting to their community pharmacy with signs and symptoms of RTI. The pilot (between October 2019 and March 2020) was stopped early due to Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the pilot period, 328 patients from 9 GP practices completed a consultation. The majority (60%) were referred to the pharmacy from their GP and presented with <3 symptoms (55%) which had a duration of up to 1 week (36%). Most patients (72%) had a CRP result of <20mg/L. A larger proportion of patients with a CRP test result between 20mg/L and 100mg/L and >100mg/L, were referred to the GP when compared to patients with a CRP test result of <20mg/L. Antimicrobial prescribing rates were studied in a subgroup (n=30) from 1 practice. Whilst the majority (22/30; 73%) had a CRP test result of <20mg/L, 50%, (15/30) of patients had contact with the GP in relation to their acute cough and 43% (13/30) had an antibiotic prescribed within 5 days. The stakeholder and patient survey reported positive experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot was successful in introducing POC CRP testing in keeping with National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations for the assessment of non-pneumonic lower RTIs and both stakeholders and patients reported positive experiences. A larger proportion of patients with a possible or likely bacterial infection as measured by CRP were referred to the GP, compared to patients with a normal CRP test result. Although stopped early due to COVID-19, the outcomes provide an insight and learning for the implementation, scale up and optimization of POC CRP testing in community pharmacy in NI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy Practice-Granada\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"2711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/74/pharmpract-20-2711.PMC9891790.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy Practice-Granada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:是否开抗生素是临床医生在社区治疗呼吸道感染(RTI)的一个关键问题。社区药房中C反应蛋白(CRP)的测量可能有助于区分病毒性和自限性感染与更严重的细菌感染。目的:在北爱尔兰(NI)的社区药房内对疑似RTI进行POC CRP检测。方法:在17家社区药房进行了POC CRP测试,这些药房与北爱尔兰的9家全科医生诊所有联系。该服务适用于出现RTI体征和症状的成年人。由于冠状病毒-19(新冠肺炎),试点(2019年10月至2020年3月)提前停止。结果:在试点期间,来自9家全科医生诊所的328名患者完成了咨询。大多数(60%)从他们的家庭医生那里转诊到药房,并服用100mg/L,与CRP检测结果为的患者相比,被转诊至全科医生。结论:该试点成功地引入了POC CRP检测,符合国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)关于评估非肺炎性较低RTI的建议,利益相关者和患者都报告了积极的经验。与CRP检测结果正常的患者相比,通过CRP检测可能或可能有细菌感染的患者中有更大比例被转诊至全科医生。尽管由于新冠肺炎而提前停止,但结果为NI社区药房POC CRP测试的实施、扩大和优化提供了见解和学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

C-reactive protein point of care testing in community pharmacy: Observational study of a Northern Ireland pilot.

C-reactive protein point of care testing in community pharmacy: Observational study of a Northern Ireland pilot.

C-reactive protein point of care testing in community pharmacy: Observational study of a Northern Ireland pilot.

C-reactive protein point of care testing in community pharmacy: Observational study of a Northern Ireland pilot.

Background: Whether or not to prescribe an antibiotic is a key issue for clinicians treating respiratory tract infection (RTI) in the community. Measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) in community pharmacy may help to differentiate viral and self-limiting infections from more serious bacterial infections.

Objective: To pilot POC CRP testing for suspected RTI within community pharmacy in Northern Ireland (NI).

Methods: POC CRP testing was piloted in 17 community pharmacies linked to 9 general practitioner (GP) practices in NI. The service was available to adults presenting to their community pharmacy with signs and symptoms of RTI. The pilot (between October 2019 and March 2020) was stopped early due to Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19).

Results: During the pilot period, 328 patients from 9 GP practices completed a consultation. The majority (60%) were referred to the pharmacy from their GP and presented with <3 symptoms (55%) which had a duration of up to 1 week (36%). Most patients (72%) had a CRP result of <20mg/L. A larger proportion of patients with a CRP test result between 20mg/L and 100mg/L and >100mg/L, were referred to the GP when compared to patients with a CRP test result of <20mg/L. Antimicrobial prescribing rates were studied in a subgroup (n=30) from 1 practice. Whilst the majority (22/30; 73%) had a CRP test result of <20mg/L, 50%, (15/30) of patients had contact with the GP in relation to their acute cough and 43% (13/30) had an antibiotic prescribed within 5 days. The stakeholder and patient survey reported positive experiences.

Conclusion: This pilot was successful in introducing POC CRP testing in keeping with National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations for the assessment of non-pneumonic lower RTIs and both stakeholders and patients reported positive experiences. A larger proportion of patients with a possible or likely bacterial infection as measured by CRP were referred to the GP, compared to patients with a normal CRP test result. Although stopped early due to COVID-19, the outcomes provide an insight and learning for the implementation, scale up and optimization of POC CRP testing in community pharmacy in NI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy Practice-Granada
Pharmacy Practice-Granada PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Practice is a free full-text peer-reviewed journal with a scope on pharmacy practice. Pharmacy Practice is published quarterly. Pharmacy Practice does not charge and will never charge any publication fee or article processing charge (APC) to the authors. The current and future absence of any article processing charges (APCs) is signed in the MoU with the Center for Pharmacy Practice Innovation (CPPI) at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy. Pharmacy Practice is the consequence of the efforts of a number of colleagues from different Universities who belief in collaborative publishing: no one pays, no one receives. Although focusing on the practice of pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice covers a wide range of pharmacy activities, among them and not being comprehensive, clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, social pharmacy, pharmacy education, process and outcome research, health promotion and education, health informatics, pharmacoepidemiology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信