在健康受试者中评价洛贝列酮、恩格列净和二甲双胍的药代动力学相互作用。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Heeyoung Kim, Choon Ok Kim, Hyeonsoo Park, Min Soo Park, Dasohm Kim, Taegon Hong, Yesong Shin, Byung Hak Jin
{"title":"在健康受试者中评价洛贝列酮、恩格列净和二甲双胍的药代动力学相互作用。","authors":"Heeyoung Kim,&nbsp;Choon Ok Kim,&nbsp;Hyeonsoo Park,&nbsp;Min Soo Park,&nbsp;Dasohm Kim,&nbsp;Taegon Hong,&nbsp;Yesong Shin,&nbsp;Byung Hak Jin","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concomitant administration of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin is expected to enhance blood glucose-lowering effects and improve medication compliance in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and safety of lobeglitazone and co-administered empagliflozin and metformin, which are approved agents used in clinical settings. Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover clinical trials (parts 1 and 2) were conducted independently. In part 1, lobeglitazone monotherapy or lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin triple therapy was administered for 5 days. In part 2, empagliflozin and metformin dual therapy or the abovementioned triple therapy were administered for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose in each period for PK evaluation. The primary PK parameters (AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>, C<sub>max,ss</sub>) of treatment regimens in each study part were calculated and compared. For lobeglitazone, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) for triple therapy over monotherapy were 1.08 (1.03-1.14) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 0.98 (0.90-1.07) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. For empagliflozin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 0.87 (0.78-0.97) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 0.97 (0.93-1.00) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. For metformin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 1.06 (0.95-1.17) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 1.04 (0.97-1.12) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. All reported adverse events were mild. The triple therapy consisting of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin did not show any clinically relevant drug interactions in relation to the PKs and safety of each drug substance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04334213.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/37/tcp-31-59.PMC10079507.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin in healthy subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Heeyoung Kim,&nbsp;Choon Ok Kim,&nbsp;Hyeonsoo Park,&nbsp;Min Soo Park,&nbsp;Dasohm Kim,&nbsp;Taegon Hong,&nbsp;Yesong Shin,&nbsp;Byung Hak Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Concomitant administration of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin is expected to enhance blood glucose-lowering effects and improve medication compliance in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and safety of lobeglitazone and co-administered empagliflozin and metformin, which are approved agents used in clinical settings. Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover clinical trials (parts 1 and 2) were conducted independently. In part 1, lobeglitazone monotherapy or lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin triple therapy was administered for 5 days. In part 2, empagliflozin and metformin dual therapy or the abovementioned triple therapy were administered for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose in each period for PK evaluation. The primary PK parameters (AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>, C<sub>max,ss</sub>) of treatment regimens in each study part were calculated and compared. For lobeglitazone, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) for triple therapy over monotherapy were 1.08 (1.03-1.14) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 0.98 (0.90-1.07) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. For empagliflozin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 0.87 (0.78-0.97) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 0.97 (0.93-1.00) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. For metformin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 1.06 (0.95-1.17) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 1.04 (0.97-1.12) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. All reported adverse events were mild. The triple therapy consisting of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin did not show any clinically relevant drug interactions in relation to the PKs and safety of each drug substance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04334213.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/37/tcp-31-59.PMC10079507.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病患者合用洛贝列酮、恩格列净和二甲双胍有望增强降糖效果,提高用药依从性。在这项研究中,我们研究了洛贝列酮和联合用药恩格列净和二甲双胍的药代动力学(PK)相互作用和安全性,这两种药物已被批准用于临床。独立进行了两项随机、开放标签、多剂量、两治疗、两期、两序列交叉临床试验(第一部分和第二部分)。在第一部分中,给予洛贝列酮单药治疗或洛贝列酮、恩帕列净和二甲双胍三联治疗5天。在第2部分中,恩格列净和二甲双胍双重治疗或上述三联治疗给予5天。在每个周期最后一次给药后24小时收集连续血液样本进行PK评估。计算比较各研究部分各处理方案的主要PK参数AUCtau、ss、Cmax、ss。对于洛贝列酮,三联治疗比单药治疗的几何平均比(GMRs)的90%置信区间(CI)为Cmax,ss为1.08 (1.03-1.14),AUCtau,ss为0.98(0.90-1.07)。对于恩格列净,三联治疗的GMRs和90% ci分别为0.87(0.78-0.97)和0.97 (0.93-1.00),Cmax,ss和AUCtau,ss。对于二甲双胍,三联治疗的GMRs和90% ci分别为Cmax,ss的1.06(0.95-1.17)和AUCtau,ss的1.04(0.97-1.12)。所有报告的不良事件都是轻微的。由洛贝列酮、恩格列净和二甲双胍组成的三联疗法在PKs和每种药物的安全性方面没有显示出任何临床相关的药物相互作用。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04334213。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin in healthy subjects.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin in healthy subjects.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin in healthy subjects.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin in healthy subjects.

Concomitant administration of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin is expected to enhance blood glucose-lowering effects and improve medication compliance in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and safety of lobeglitazone and co-administered empagliflozin and metformin, which are approved agents used in clinical settings. Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover clinical trials (parts 1 and 2) were conducted independently. In part 1, lobeglitazone monotherapy or lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin triple therapy was administered for 5 days. In part 2, empagliflozin and metformin dual therapy or the abovementioned triple therapy were administered for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose in each period for PK evaluation. The primary PK parameters (AUCtau,ss, Cmax,ss) of treatment regimens in each study part were calculated and compared. For lobeglitazone, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) for triple therapy over monotherapy were 1.08 (1.03-1.14) for Cmax,ss and 0.98 (0.90-1.07) for AUCtau,ss. For empagliflozin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 0.87 (0.78-0.97) for Cmax,ss and 0.97 (0.93-1.00) for AUCtau,ss. For metformin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 1.06 (0.95-1.17) for Cmax,ss and 1.04 (0.97-1.12) for AUCtau,ss. All reported adverse events were mild. The triple therapy consisting of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin did not show any clinically relevant drug interactions in relation to the PKs and safety of each drug substance.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04334213.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信