{"title":"利用医疗保健大数据分析韩国牙科机构使用牙科镇静剂的年度变化及镇静剂类型。","authors":"Minjae Lee, Seong In Chi, Hyuk Kim, Kwang-Suk Seo","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.2.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dentists make various efforts to reduce patients' anxiety and fear associated with dental treatment. Dental sedation is an advanced method that dentists can perform to reduce patients' anxiety and fear and provide effective dental treatment. However, dental sedation is different from general dental treatment and requires separate learning, and if done incorrectly, can lead to serious complications. Therefore, sedation is performed by a limited number of dentists who have received specific training. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of dentists who practice sedation and the main sedatives they use in the context of the Republic of Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the customized health information data provided by the Korean National Health Insurance. We investigated the number of dental hospitals or clinics that claimed insurance for eight main sedatives commonly used in dental sedation from January, 2007 to September, 2019 at the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. We also identified the changes in the number of dental medical institutions by region and year and analyzed the number and proportion of dental medical institutions prescribing each sedative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2007, 302 dental hospitals prescribed sedatives, and the number increased to 613 in 2019. In 2007, approximately 2.18% of the total 13,796 dental institutions prescribed sedatives, increasing to 3.31% in 2019. In 2007, 168 institutions (55.6%) prescribed N<sub>2</sub>O alone, and in 2019, 510 institutions (83.1%) made claims for it. In 2007, 76 (25.1%) hospitals made claims for chloral hydrate, but the number gradually decreased, with only 29 hospitals (4.7%) prescribing it in 2019. Hospitals that prescribed a combination of N<sub>2</sub>O, chloral hydrate, and hydroxyzine increased from 27 (8.9%) in 2007 to 51 (9%) in 2017 but decreased to 38 (6.1%) in 2019. The use of a combination of N<sub>2</sub>O and midazolam increased from 20 hospitals (6.6%) in 2007 to 51 hospitals (8.3%) in 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there is a critical limitation to the investigation of dental hospitals performing sedation using insurance claims data, namely exclusion of dental clinics providing non-insured treatments, we found that in 2019, approximately 3.31% of the dental clinics were practicing sedation and that N<sub>2</sub>O was the most commonly prescribed sedative.</p>","PeriodicalId":15634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"23 2","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/fe/jdapm-23-101.PMC10079767.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the annual changes in dental institutions that claimed dental sedatives in Korea and the types of sedatives using health care big data.\",\"authors\":\"Minjae Lee, Seong In Chi, Hyuk Kim, Kwang-Suk Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.2.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dentists make various efforts to reduce patients' anxiety and fear associated with dental treatment. Dental sedation is an advanced method that dentists can perform to reduce patients' anxiety and fear and provide effective dental treatment. However, dental sedation is different from general dental treatment and requires separate learning, and if done incorrectly, can lead to serious complications. Therefore, sedation is performed by a limited number of dentists who have received specific training. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of dentists who practice sedation and the main sedatives they use in the context of the Republic of Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the customized health information data provided by the Korean National Health Insurance. We investigated the number of dental hospitals or clinics that claimed insurance for eight main sedatives commonly used in dental sedation from January, 2007 to September, 2019 at the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. We also identified the changes in the number of dental medical institutions by region and year and analyzed the number and proportion of dental medical institutions prescribing each sedative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2007, 302 dental hospitals prescribed sedatives, and the number increased to 613 in 2019. In 2007, approximately 2.18% of the total 13,796 dental institutions prescribed sedatives, increasing to 3.31% in 2019. In 2007, 168 institutions (55.6%) prescribed N<sub>2</sub>O alone, and in 2019, 510 institutions (83.1%) made claims for it. In 2007, 76 (25.1%) hospitals made claims for chloral hydrate, but the number gradually decreased, with only 29 hospitals (4.7%) prescribing it in 2019. Hospitals that prescribed a combination of N<sub>2</sub>O, chloral hydrate, and hydroxyzine increased from 27 (8.9%) in 2007 to 51 (9%) in 2017 but decreased to 38 (6.1%) in 2019. The use of a combination of N<sub>2</sub>O and midazolam increased from 20 hospitals (6.6%) in 2007 to 51 hospitals (8.3%) in 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there is a critical limitation to the investigation of dental hospitals performing sedation using insurance claims data, namely exclusion of dental clinics providing non-insured treatments, we found that in 2019, approximately 3.31% of the dental clinics were practicing sedation and that N<sub>2</sub>O was the most commonly prescribed sedative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"101-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/fe/jdapm-23-101.PMC10079767.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.2.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.2.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:牙医通过各种努力来减少患者对牙科治疗的焦虑和恐惧。牙科镇静是一种先进的方法,牙医可以执行,以减少病人的焦虑和恐惧,并提供有效的牙科治疗。然而,牙科镇静不同于一般的牙科治疗,需要单独学习,如果操作不当,可能会导致严重的并发症。因此,镇静是由少数接受过专门培训的牙医来执行的。本研究旨在调查牙医谁实践镇静的比例和他们使用的主要镇静剂在大韩民国的背景下。方法:采用韩国国民健康保险提供的定制化健康信息数据。我们调查了2007年1月至2019年9月在健康保险审查和评估服务中心(Health insurance Review and Assessment Service)申请牙科镇静常用的八种主要镇静剂保险的牙科医院或诊所的数量。我们还确定了按地区和年份划分的牙科医疗机构数量的变化情况,并分析了处方每种镇静剂的牙科医疗机构的数量和比例。结果:2007年,有302家牙科医院开了镇静剂,2019年增加到613家。2007年,在13,796家牙科机构中,约有2.18%的机构开具镇静剂处方,2019年这一比例上升至3.31%。2007年,168家机构(55.6%)单独开具了N2O处方,2019年,510家机构(83.1%)申请了N2O处方。2007年,76家(25.1%)医院对水合氯醛进行了索赔,但这一数字逐渐减少,2019年只有29家(4.7%)医院开了水合氯醛处方。使用一氧化二氮、水合氯醛和羟嗪混合处方的医院从2007年的27家(8.9%)增加到2017年的51家(9%),但到2019年减少到38家(6.1%)。N2O和咪达唑仑联合使用的医院从2007年的20家(6.6%)增加到2019年的51家(8.3%)。结论:虽然使用保险索赔数据调查实施镇静的牙科医院存在一个关键限制,即排除了提供非保险治疗的牙科诊所,但我们发现,在2019年,约有3.31%的牙科诊所实施镇静,N2O是最常用的镇静剂。
Analysis of the annual changes in dental institutions that claimed dental sedatives in Korea and the types of sedatives using health care big data.
Background: Dentists make various efforts to reduce patients' anxiety and fear associated with dental treatment. Dental sedation is an advanced method that dentists can perform to reduce patients' anxiety and fear and provide effective dental treatment. However, dental sedation is different from general dental treatment and requires separate learning, and if done incorrectly, can lead to serious complications. Therefore, sedation is performed by a limited number of dentists who have received specific training. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of dentists who practice sedation and the main sedatives they use in the context of the Republic of Korea.
Methods: We used the customized health information data provided by the Korean National Health Insurance. We investigated the number of dental hospitals or clinics that claimed insurance for eight main sedatives commonly used in dental sedation from January, 2007 to September, 2019 at the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. We also identified the changes in the number of dental medical institutions by region and year and analyzed the number and proportion of dental medical institutions prescribing each sedative.
Results: In 2007, 302 dental hospitals prescribed sedatives, and the number increased to 613 in 2019. In 2007, approximately 2.18% of the total 13,796 dental institutions prescribed sedatives, increasing to 3.31% in 2019. In 2007, 168 institutions (55.6%) prescribed N2O alone, and in 2019, 510 institutions (83.1%) made claims for it. In 2007, 76 (25.1%) hospitals made claims for chloral hydrate, but the number gradually decreased, with only 29 hospitals (4.7%) prescribing it in 2019. Hospitals that prescribed a combination of N2O, chloral hydrate, and hydroxyzine increased from 27 (8.9%) in 2007 to 51 (9%) in 2017 but decreased to 38 (6.1%) in 2019. The use of a combination of N2O and midazolam increased from 20 hospitals (6.6%) in 2007 to 51 hospitals (8.3%) in 2019.
Conclusion: While there is a critical limitation to the investigation of dental hospitals performing sedation using insurance claims data, namely exclusion of dental clinics providing non-insured treatments, we found that in 2019, approximately 3.31% of the dental clinics were practicing sedation and that N2O was the most commonly prescribed sedative.