保留乳头的金凤花乳房切除术——对原有技术的新改良。

Ahmed Setit, Khaled Bela, Ashraf Khater, Islam Elzahaby, Amr Hossam, Emad Hamed
{"title":"保留乳头的金凤花乳房切除术——对原有技术的新改良。","authors":"Ahmed Setit,&nbsp;Khaled Bela,&nbsp;Ashraf Khater,&nbsp;Islam Elzahaby,&nbsp;Amr Hossam,&nbsp;Emad Hamed","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although Goldilocks mastectomy offers good aesthetic outcomes. Removal of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) often has a negative psychological impact. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and esthetic outcome of this technique with salvage of the NAC using a dermal pedicle.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included female patients suffering from breast carcinoma with large and or ptotic breast. Patients were offered Goldilocks mastectomy. Those who were unfit for anesthesia, those with locally advanced or metastatic disease or those refusing the procedure were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen female patients (18 breasts) with a mean age of 51.6 years underwent Goldilocks breast reconstruction with a trial of NAC preservation. The mean body mass index was 39.1 kg/m2. More than half (56%) were cup C, while 44% were cup D. Seven cases (46.7%) showed grade II ptosis and 8 (53.3%) were grade III. The mean operative time was 168 minutes (range 130-240 minutes). NAC ischemic changes were noted in five cases; two (11%) were partial while three (17%) were total. Two cases (11%) suffered from flap loss and one of them was total. No locoregional recurrence or distant metastases were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Goldilocks mastectomy with nipple preservation is an appealing and feasible option for a certain group of patients who have large-sized and/or ptotic breasts. Nevertheless, it is a time-consuming technique with relatively higher rates of flap and NAC complications. Further, studies are required with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":11885,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":"19 2","pages":"172-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071885/pdf/ejbh-19-172.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy, A New Modification of the Original Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Setit,&nbsp;Khaled Bela,&nbsp;Ashraf Khater,&nbsp;Islam Elzahaby,&nbsp;Amr Hossam,&nbsp;Emad Hamed\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-2-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although Goldilocks mastectomy offers good aesthetic outcomes. Removal of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) often has a negative psychological impact. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and esthetic outcome of this technique with salvage of the NAC using a dermal pedicle.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included female patients suffering from breast carcinoma with large and or ptotic breast. Patients were offered Goldilocks mastectomy. Those who were unfit for anesthesia, those with locally advanced or metastatic disease or those refusing the procedure were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen female patients (18 breasts) with a mean age of 51.6 years underwent Goldilocks breast reconstruction with a trial of NAC preservation. The mean body mass index was 39.1 kg/m2. More than half (56%) were cup C, while 44% were cup D. Seven cases (46.7%) showed grade II ptosis and 8 (53.3%) were grade III. The mean operative time was 168 minutes (range 130-240 minutes). NAC ischemic changes were noted in five cases; two (11%) were partial while three (17%) were total. Two cases (11%) suffered from flap loss and one of them was total. No locoregional recurrence or distant metastases were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Goldilocks mastectomy with nipple preservation is an appealing and feasible option for a certain group of patients who have large-sized and/or ptotic breasts. Nevertheless, it is a time-consuming technique with relatively higher rates of flap and NAC complications. Further, studies are required with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of breast health\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"172-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071885/pdf/ejbh-19-172.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of breast health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-2-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-2-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然金凤花乳房切除术具有良好的美容效果。乳头-乳晕复合体(NAC)的切除通常会产生负面的心理影响。本研究的目的是评估使用真皮蒂挽救NAC的可行性和美学结果。材料与方法:研究对象为女性乳腺癌伴大乳或上睑下垂患者。患者接受金凤花乳房切除术。那些不适合麻醉的人,那些局部晚期或转移性疾病的人或拒绝手术的人被排除在外。结果:女性患者15例(18个乳房),平均年龄51.6岁,行金凤花乳房再造术并进行NAC保存试验。平均体重指数为39.1 kg/m2。半数以上(56%)为C杯,44%为d杯,7例(46.7%)为II级,8例(53.3%)为III级。平均手术时间168分钟(130 ~ 240分钟)。NAC缺血性改变5例;2例(11%)为部分,3例(17%)为全部。2例(11%)皮瓣缺损,1例为全皮瓣缺损。未见局部复发或远处转移。结论:保留乳头的金凤花乳房切除术对于某些大乳房和(或)上睑下垂患者是一种有吸引力和可行的选择。然而,这是一项耗时的技术,皮瓣和NAC并发症的发生率相对较高。此外,还需要对更多的病例和更长时间的随访进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy, A New Modification of the Original Technique.

Objective: Although Goldilocks mastectomy offers good aesthetic outcomes. Removal of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) often has a negative psychological impact. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and esthetic outcome of this technique with salvage of the NAC using a dermal pedicle.

Materials and methods: The study included female patients suffering from breast carcinoma with large and or ptotic breast. Patients were offered Goldilocks mastectomy. Those who were unfit for anesthesia, those with locally advanced or metastatic disease or those refusing the procedure were excluded.

Results: Fifteen female patients (18 breasts) with a mean age of 51.6 years underwent Goldilocks breast reconstruction with a trial of NAC preservation. The mean body mass index was 39.1 kg/m2. More than half (56%) were cup C, while 44% were cup D. Seven cases (46.7%) showed grade II ptosis and 8 (53.3%) were grade III. The mean operative time was 168 minutes (range 130-240 minutes). NAC ischemic changes were noted in five cases; two (11%) were partial while three (17%) were total. Two cases (11%) suffered from flap loss and one of them was total. No locoregional recurrence or distant metastases were observed.

Conclusion: The Goldilocks mastectomy with nipple preservation is an appealing and feasible option for a certain group of patients who have large-sized and/or ptotic breasts. Nevertheless, it is a time-consuming technique with relatively higher rates of flap and NAC complications. Further, studies are required with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信