脊髓硬膜外刺激对慢性脊髓损伤后运动和自主神经功能恢复的作用:一个病例系列和技术说明。

Q3 Medicine
Maxwell Boakye, Tyler Ball, Nicholas Dietz, Mayur Sharma, Claudia Angeli, Enrico Rejc, Steven Kirshblum, Gail Forrest, Forest W Arnold, Susan Harkema
{"title":"脊髓硬膜外刺激对慢性脊髓损伤后运动和自主神经功能恢复的作用:一个病例系列和技术说明。","authors":"Maxwell Boakye,&nbsp;Tyler Ball,&nbsp;Nicholas Dietz,&nbsp;Mayur Sharma,&nbsp;Claudia Angeli,&nbsp;Enrico Rejc,&nbsp;Steven Kirshblum,&nbsp;Gail Forrest,&nbsp;Forest W Arnold,&nbsp;Susan Harkema","doi":"10.25259/SNI_1074_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a debilitating condition, leading to chronic morbidity and mortality. In recent peer-reviewed studies, spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) enabled voluntary movement and return of over-ground walking in a small number of patients with motor complete SCI. Using the most extensive case series (<i>n</i> = 25) for chronic SCI, the present report describes our motor and cardiovascular and functional outcomes, surgical and training complication rates, quality of life (QOL) improvements, and patient satisfaction results after scES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study occurred at the University of Louisville from 2009 to 2020. scES interventions began 2-3 weeks after surgical implantation of the scES device. Perioperative complications were recorded as well as long-term complications during training and device related events. QOL outcomes and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the impairment domains model and a global patient satisfaction scale, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five patients (80% male, mean age of 30.9 ± 9.4 years) with chronic motor complete tSCI underwent scES using an epidural paddle electrode and internal pulse generator. The interval from SCI to scES implantation was 5.9 ± 3.4 years. Two participants (8%) developed infections, and three additional patients required washouts (12%). All participants achieved voluntary movement after implantation. A total of 17 research participants (85%) reported that the procedure either met (<i>n</i> = 9) or exceeded (<i>n</i> = 8) their expectations, and 100% would undergo the operation again.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>scES in this series was safe and achieved numerous benefits on motor and cardiovascular regulation and improved patient-reported QOL in multiple domains, with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The multiple previously unreported benefits beyond improvements in motor function render scES a promising option for improving QOL after motor complete SCI. Further studies may quantify these other benefits and clarify scES's role in SCI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38981,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology International","volume":"14 ","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/84/SNI-14-87.PMC10070319.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal cord epidural stimulation for motor and autonomic function recovery after chronic spinal cord injury: A case series and technical note.\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell Boakye,&nbsp;Tyler Ball,&nbsp;Nicholas Dietz,&nbsp;Mayur Sharma,&nbsp;Claudia Angeli,&nbsp;Enrico Rejc,&nbsp;Steven Kirshblum,&nbsp;Gail Forrest,&nbsp;Forest W Arnold,&nbsp;Susan Harkema\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_1074_2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a debilitating condition, leading to chronic morbidity and mortality. In recent peer-reviewed studies, spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) enabled voluntary movement and return of over-ground walking in a small number of patients with motor complete SCI. Using the most extensive case series (<i>n</i> = 25) for chronic SCI, the present report describes our motor and cardiovascular and functional outcomes, surgical and training complication rates, quality of life (QOL) improvements, and patient satisfaction results after scES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study occurred at the University of Louisville from 2009 to 2020. scES interventions began 2-3 weeks after surgical implantation of the scES device. Perioperative complications were recorded as well as long-term complications during training and device related events. QOL outcomes and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the impairment domains model and a global patient satisfaction scale, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five patients (80% male, mean age of 30.9 ± 9.4 years) with chronic motor complete tSCI underwent scES using an epidural paddle electrode and internal pulse generator. The interval from SCI to scES implantation was 5.9 ± 3.4 years. Two participants (8%) developed infections, and three additional patients required washouts (12%). All participants achieved voluntary movement after implantation. A total of 17 research participants (85%) reported that the procedure either met (<i>n</i> = 9) or exceeded (<i>n</i> = 8) their expectations, and 100% would undergo the operation again.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>scES in this series was safe and achieved numerous benefits on motor and cardiovascular regulation and improved patient-reported QOL in multiple domains, with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The multiple previously unreported benefits beyond improvements in motor function render scES a promising option for improving QOL after motor complete SCI. Further studies may quantify these other benefits and clarify scES's role in SCI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Neurology International\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/84/SNI-14-87.PMC10070319.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Neurology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_1074_2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_1074_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外伤性脊髓损伤(tSCI)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,导致慢性发病率和死亡率。在最近的同行评议研究中,脊髓硬膜外刺激(scES)使少数运动完全性脊髓损伤患者的自主运动和地上行走恢复。使用最广泛的慢性脊髓损伤病例系列(n = 25),本报告描述了我们的运动、心血管和功能结果,手术和训练并发症发生率,生活质量(QOL)改善,以及scES后患者满意度结果。方法:这项前瞻性研究于2009年至2020年在路易斯维尔大学进行。scES干预在手术植入scES装置后2-3周开始。记录围手术期并发症以及训练期间的长期并发症和器械相关事件。生活质量结果和患者满意度分别使用损伤域模型和整体患者满意度量表进行评估。结果:25例慢性运动性完全性tSCI患者(80%为男性,平均年龄30.9±9.4岁)采用硬膜外桨状电极和内脉冲发生器进行了scES。从SCI到scES植入的时间间隔为5.9±3.4年。2名参与者(8%)发生感染,另外3名患者需要冲洗(12%)。所有受试者在植入后均能自主活动。共有17名研究参与者(85%)报告手术达到(n = 9)或超过(n = 8)他们的预期,100%的人会再次接受手术。结论:scES在该系列中是安全的,在运动和心血管调节方面取得了许多益处,并在多个领域改善了患者报告的生活质量,患者满意度很高。除了运动功能的改善之外,scES的多种先前未报道的益处使其成为改善运动完全性脊髓损伤后生活质量的有希望的选择。进一步的研究可能会量化这些其他益处,并阐明scES在SCI患者中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Spinal cord epidural stimulation for motor and autonomic function recovery after chronic spinal cord injury: A case series and technical note.

Spinal cord epidural stimulation for motor and autonomic function recovery after chronic spinal cord injury: A case series and technical note.

Spinal cord epidural stimulation for motor and autonomic function recovery after chronic spinal cord injury: A case series and technical note.

Spinal cord epidural stimulation for motor and autonomic function recovery after chronic spinal cord injury: A case series and technical note.

Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a debilitating condition, leading to chronic morbidity and mortality. In recent peer-reviewed studies, spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) enabled voluntary movement and return of over-ground walking in a small number of patients with motor complete SCI. Using the most extensive case series (n = 25) for chronic SCI, the present report describes our motor and cardiovascular and functional outcomes, surgical and training complication rates, quality of life (QOL) improvements, and patient satisfaction results after scES.

Methods: This prospective study occurred at the University of Louisville from 2009 to 2020. scES interventions began 2-3 weeks after surgical implantation of the scES device. Perioperative complications were recorded as well as long-term complications during training and device related events. QOL outcomes and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the impairment domains model and a global patient satisfaction scale, respectively.

Results: Twenty-five patients (80% male, mean age of 30.9 ± 9.4 years) with chronic motor complete tSCI underwent scES using an epidural paddle electrode and internal pulse generator. The interval from SCI to scES implantation was 5.9 ± 3.4 years. Two participants (8%) developed infections, and three additional patients required washouts (12%). All participants achieved voluntary movement after implantation. A total of 17 research participants (85%) reported that the procedure either met (n = 9) or exceeded (n = 8) their expectations, and 100% would undergo the operation again.

Conclusion: scES in this series was safe and achieved numerous benefits on motor and cardiovascular regulation and improved patient-reported QOL in multiple domains, with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The multiple previously unreported benefits beyond improvements in motor function render scES a promising option for improving QOL after motor complete SCI. Further studies may quantify these other benefits and clarify scES's role in SCI patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信