不同培养条件下脂肪源性间充质干细胞转录组谱及抗菌效果的改变

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Chen Chen, Xiaoming Hou, Fujia Jing, Tao Wang, Li Feng, James Kang
{"title":"不同培养条件下脂肪源性间充质干细胞转录组谱及抗菌效果的改变","authors":"Chen Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoming Hou,&nbsp;Fujia Jing,&nbsp;Tao Wang,&nbsp;Li Feng,&nbsp;James Kang","doi":"10.1089/scd.2022.0238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are a promising therapeutic agent for various diseases, including sepsis. However, translating MSC therapy to clinical applications remains challenging due to variations in the properties of MSCs under different preparation conditions. In this study, the gene expression profiles of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (ADSCs) under different culture conditions were compared in relation to their therapeutic efficacy for sepsis. Results showed that ADSCs cultured in media supplemented with human platelet lysates (hPL) (hPL-ADSCs) exhibited a smaller cell size and higher proliferative capacity, whereas ADSCs cultured in media supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) (FBS-ADSCs) showed a broader and flatter shape. Both hPL-ADSCs and FBS-ADSCs exhibited a protective effect in a mouse model of sepsis; however, hPL-ADSCs displayed a better potency for immunosuppressive function, as evidenced by a better improvement of survival rate and further reduction of tissue injury and infectious biomarkers (alanine transaminase and procalcitonin). Furthermore, hPL-ADSCs caused a more anti-inflammatory transcriptomic shift, whereas FBS-ADSCs led to more depression of proinflammatory transcriptomic response. This study thus demonstrates that both hPL-ADSCs and FBS-ADSCs are effective for antiseptic therapy via different mechanisms of inflammatory manipulation, although hPL-ADSCs may imply a better preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":21934,"journal":{"name":"Stem cells and development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alteration of Transcriptomic Profile and Antiseptic Efficacy of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells Under Different Culture Conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Chen Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoming Hou,&nbsp;Fujia Jing,&nbsp;Tao Wang,&nbsp;Li Feng,&nbsp;James Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/scd.2022.0238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are a promising therapeutic agent for various diseases, including sepsis. However, translating MSC therapy to clinical applications remains challenging due to variations in the properties of MSCs under different preparation conditions. In this study, the gene expression profiles of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (ADSCs) under different culture conditions were compared in relation to their therapeutic efficacy for sepsis. Results showed that ADSCs cultured in media supplemented with human platelet lysates (hPL) (hPL-ADSCs) exhibited a smaller cell size and higher proliferative capacity, whereas ADSCs cultured in media supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) (FBS-ADSCs) showed a broader and flatter shape. Both hPL-ADSCs and FBS-ADSCs exhibited a protective effect in a mouse model of sepsis; however, hPL-ADSCs displayed a better potency for immunosuppressive function, as evidenced by a better improvement of survival rate and further reduction of tissue injury and infectious biomarkers (alanine transaminase and procalcitonin). Furthermore, hPL-ADSCs caused a more anti-inflammatory transcriptomic shift, whereas FBS-ADSCs led to more depression of proinflammatory transcriptomic response. This study thus demonstrates that both hPL-ADSCs and FBS-ADSCs are effective for antiseptic therapy via different mechanisms of inflammatory manipulation, although hPL-ADSCs may imply a better preference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stem cells and development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stem cells and development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2022.0238\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem cells and development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2022.0238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

间充质基质/干细胞(MSCs)是一种很有前途的治疗多种疾病的药物,包括败血症。然而,由于MSCs在不同制备条件下的性质不同,将MSC治疗转化为临床应用仍然具有挑战性。本研究比较了不同培养条件下人脂肪源性间充质干细胞(ADSCs)的基因表达谱及其对脓毒症的治疗效果。结果表明,在添加人血小板裂解物(hPL)的培养基中培养的ADSCs (hPL-ADSCs)具有更小的细胞大小和更高的增殖能力,而在添加胎牛血清(FBS)的培养基中培养的ADSCs (FBS-ADSCs)具有更宽、更平坦的形状。hPL-ADSCs和FBS-ADSCs在脓毒症小鼠模型中均表现出保护作用;然而,hPL-ADSCs显示出更好的免疫抑制功能,这可以通过更好地提高存活率和进一步减少组织损伤和感染性生物标志物(丙氨酸转氨酶和降钙素原)来证明。此外,hPL-ADSCs引起更多的抗炎转录组转变,而FBS-ADSCs导致更多的促炎转录组反应抑制。因此,本研究表明,hPL-ADSCs和FBS-ADSCs通过不同的炎症操纵机制对抗菌治疗有效,尽管hPL-ADSCs可能具有更好的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alteration of Transcriptomic Profile and Antiseptic Efficacy of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells Under Different Culture Conditions.

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are a promising therapeutic agent for various diseases, including sepsis. However, translating MSC therapy to clinical applications remains challenging due to variations in the properties of MSCs under different preparation conditions. In this study, the gene expression profiles of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (ADSCs) under different culture conditions were compared in relation to their therapeutic efficacy for sepsis. Results showed that ADSCs cultured in media supplemented with human platelet lysates (hPL) (hPL-ADSCs) exhibited a smaller cell size and higher proliferative capacity, whereas ADSCs cultured in media supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) (FBS-ADSCs) showed a broader and flatter shape. Both hPL-ADSCs and FBS-ADSCs exhibited a protective effect in a mouse model of sepsis; however, hPL-ADSCs displayed a better potency for immunosuppressive function, as evidenced by a better improvement of survival rate and further reduction of tissue injury and infectious biomarkers (alanine transaminase and procalcitonin). Furthermore, hPL-ADSCs caused a more anti-inflammatory transcriptomic shift, whereas FBS-ADSCs led to more depression of proinflammatory transcriptomic response. This study thus demonstrates that both hPL-ADSCs and FBS-ADSCs are effective for antiseptic therapy via different mechanisms of inflammatory manipulation, although hPL-ADSCs may imply a better preference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stem cells and development
Stem cells and development 医学-细胞与组织工程
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stem Cells and Development is globally recognized as the trusted source for critical, even controversial coverage of emerging hypotheses and novel findings. With a focus on stem cells of all tissue types and their potential therapeutic applications, the Journal provides clinical, basic, and translational scientists with cutting-edge research and findings. Stem Cells and Development coverage includes: Embryogenesis and adult counterparts of this process Physical processes linking stem cells, primary cell function, and structural development Hypotheses exploring the relationship between genotype and phenotype Development of vasculature, CNS, and other germ layer development and defects Pluripotentiality of embryonic and somatic stem cells The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信