医疗风险驾驶者与健康对照者的视觉运动处理速度和反应时间差异。

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-14 DOI:10.1080/07380577.2023.2177790
Victoria Penna, Anne Dickerson, Qiang Wu
{"title":"医疗风险驾驶者与健康对照者的视觉运动处理速度和反应时间差异。","authors":"Victoria Penna, Anne Dickerson, Qiang Wu","doi":"10.1080/07380577.2023.2177790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study compared visual-motor processing speed and reaction times between medically-at-risk drivers and normal controls to determine if the time in seconds distinguished between drivers who pass, fail, or need restrictions based on a road test. The medically-at-risk drivers' data (N = 35, 28-89 years) were collected as part of a comprehensive driving evaluation and coded by diagnosis (e.g., cognitive, neurological, medical) and driving outcome. The healthy control (N = 121, 21-79 years) data were collected in previous studies. The Vision Coach™ <i>Full Field 60</i> task was used to collect reaction times in seconds between the two groups. Independent t-tests showed a significant difference (<i>p</i> < .001) in trial times between healthy controls and medically-at-risk adults. No significant difference (<i>p</i> = .141) was found between the three diagnoses groups. The resulting scores from the Vision Coach™ demonstrated a significant different (<i>p</i> < .001) between those who were determined <i>fit to drive without restrictions</i> and those who were determined <i>not fit to drive</i> after a comprehensive driving evaluation, showing the potential to be used as a screening tool for determining driving risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":46157,"journal":{"name":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","volume":" ","pages":"42-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual-Motor Processing Speed and Reaction Time Differences between Medically-At-Risk Drivers and Healthy Controls.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Penna, Anne Dickerson, Qiang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07380577.2023.2177790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This cross-sectional study compared visual-motor processing speed and reaction times between medically-at-risk drivers and normal controls to determine if the time in seconds distinguished between drivers who pass, fail, or need restrictions based on a road test. The medically-at-risk drivers' data (N = 35, 28-89 years) were collected as part of a comprehensive driving evaluation and coded by diagnosis (e.g., cognitive, neurological, medical) and driving outcome. The healthy control (N = 121, 21-79 years) data were collected in previous studies. The Vision Coach™ <i>Full Field 60</i> task was used to collect reaction times in seconds between the two groups. Independent t-tests showed a significant difference (<i>p</i> < .001) in trial times between healthy controls and medically-at-risk adults. No significant difference (<i>p</i> = .141) was found between the three diagnoses groups. The resulting scores from the Vision Coach™ demonstrated a significant different (<i>p</i> < .001) between those who were determined <i>fit to drive without restrictions</i> and those who were determined <i>not fit to drive</i> after a comprehensive driving evaluation, showing the potential to be used as a screening tool for determining driving risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"42-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2023.2177790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2023.2177790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项横断面研究比较了有医疗风险的驾驶员和正常对照组的视觉运动处理速度和反应时间,以确定以秒为单位的时间是否能区分通过路试、未通过路试或需要限制路试的驾驶员。医学风险驾驶者(35 人,28-89 岁)的数据是作为综合驾驶评估的一部分收集的,并按诊断(如认知、神经、医疗)和驾驶结果进行编码。健康对照组(N = 121,21-79 岁)的数据是在之前的研究中收集的。使用 Vision Coach™ Full Field 60 任务收集两组人的反应时间(以秒为单位)。独立 t 检验显示,健康对照组和高危成人的反应时间存在显著差异(p < .001)。三个诊断组之间无明显差异(p = .141)。通过 Vision Coach™ 得出的分数显示,在经过综合驾驶评估后被确定为适合无限制驾驶的人群与被确定为不适合驾驶的人群之间存在显著差异(p < .001),这表明 Vision Coach™ 有可能被用作确定驾驶风险的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visual-Motor Processing Speed and Reaction Time Differences between Medically-At-Risk Drivers and Healthy Controls.

This cross-sectional study compared visual-motor processing speed and reaction times between medically-at-risk drivers and normal controls to determine if the time in seconds distinguished between drivers who pass, fail, or need restrictions based on a road test. The medically-at-risk drivers' data (N = 35, 28-89 years) were collected as part of a comprehensive driving evaluation and coded by diagnosis (e.g., cognitive, neurological, medical) and driving outcome. The healthy control (N = 121, 21-79 years) data were collected in previous studies. The Vision Coach™ Full Field 60 task was used to collect reaction times in seconds between the two groups. Independent t-tests showed a significant difference (p < .001) in trial times between healthy controls and medically-at-risk adults. No significant difference (p = .141) was found between the three diagnoses groups. The resulting scores from the Vision Coach™ demonstrated a significant different (p < .001) between those who were determined fit to drive without restrictions and those who were determined not fit to drive after a comprehensive driving evaluation, showing the potential to be used as a screening tool for determining driving risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy in Health Care is a journal of contemporary practice in occupational therapy. It provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field. Focused on everyday practice, the journal addresses the concerns of new and experienced therapists, presenting innovations in client evaluations and treatments, current research findings, critical reviews of current textbooks, descriptions of novel programs and descriptions of fieldwork innovations. An essential guide to the changing trends in health care, social services, and education, Occupational Therapy in Health Care provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信