Sarah M. Vargas, Thomas M. Johnson, Aaron S. Pfaff, April P. Bumpers, Jennah C. Wagner, Joseph K. Retrum, Aaron N. Colamarino, Megan E. Bunting, James P. Wilson, Carsen R. McDaniel, Robert W. Herold, Brian W. Stancoven, Adam R. Lincicum
{"title":"轻度、中度和重度水平嵴缺损部位牙槽嵴隆凸的临床方案选择。","authors":"Sarah M. Vargas, Thomas M. Johnson, Aaron S. Pfaff, April P. Bumpers, Jennah C. Wagner, Joseph K. Retrum, Aaron N. Colamarino, Megan E. Bunting, James P. Wilson, Carsen R. McDaniel, Robert W. Herold, Brian W. Stancoven, Adam R. Lincicum","doi":"10.1002/cap.10239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Focused clinical question</h3>\n \n <p>What factors identify the optimal bone augmentation techniques for managing slight, moderate, and severe horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency (ARD) at dental implant sites?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Horizontal ARD is a concern at a high proportion of sites receiving dental implants, and clinicians have developed a variety of surgical procedures to address such defects. In a particular case, selection of the optimal treatment may depend predominantly on defect severity, location (anterior versus posterior), and configuration (contained versus noncontained). This report provides a framework for selecting an augmentation method when presented with a slight, moderate, or severe horizontal ARD at a site requiring dental implant placement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple treatment options are available for planned implant sites exhibiting horizontal ARD; severe posterior and slight anterior defects intuitively call for different approaches. Although rigid guidelines for selecting the optimal augmentation method do not exist, some techniques are poorly suited for esthetically demanding sites. A framework considering defect severity, location, and configuration may help guide clinical decisions on this topic.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":"13 3","pages":"174-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M. Vargas, Thomas M. Johnson, Aaron S. Pfaff, April P. Bumpers, Jennah C. Wagner, Joseph K. Retrum, Aaron N. Colamarino, Megan E. Bunting, James P. Wilson, Carsen R. McDaniel, Robert W. Herold, Brian W. Stancoven, Adam R. Lincicum\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cap.10239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Focused clinical question</h3>\\n \\n <p>What factors identify the optimal bone augmentation techniques for managing slight, moderate, and severe horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency (ARD) at dental implant sites?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>Horizontal ARD is a concern at a high proportion of sites receiving dental implants, and clinicians have developed a variety of surgical procedures to address such defects. In a particular case, selection of the optimal treatment may depend predominantly on defect severity, location (anterior versus posterior), and configuration (contained versus noncontained). This report provides a framework for selecting an augmentation method when presented with a slight, moderate, or severe horizontal ARD at a site requiring dental implant placement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiple treatment options are available for planned implant sites exhibiting horizontal ARD; severe posterior and slight anterior defects intuitively call for different approaches. Although rigid guidelines for selecting the optimal augmentation method do not exist, some techniques are poorly suited for esthetically demanding sites. A framework considering defect severity, location, and configuration may help guide clinical decisions on this topic.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Advances in Periodontics\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"174-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Advances in Periodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cap.10239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cap.10239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies
Focused clinical question
What factors identify the optimal bone augmentation techniques for managing slight, moderate, and severe horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency (ARD) at dental implant sites?
Summary
Horizontal ARD is a concern at a high proportion of sites receiving dental implants, and clinicians have developed a variety of surgical procedures to address such defects. In a particular case, selection of the optimal treatment may depend predominantly on defect severity, location (anterior versus posterior), and configuration (contained versus noncontained). This report provides a framework for selecting an augmentation method when presented with a slight, moderate, or severe horizontal ARD at a site requiring dental implant placement.
Conclusion
Multiple treatment options are available for planned implant sites exhibiting horizontal ARD; severe posterior and slight anterior defects intuitively call for different approaches. Although rigid guidelines for selecting the optimal augmentation method do not exist, some techniques are poorly suited for esthetically demanding sites. A framework considering defect severity, location, and configuration may help guide clinical decisions on this topic.