{"title":"哺乳动物严格感天头蝇科(环头蝇科)雌蚊属及其形态特征。","authors":"Voitto Haukisalmi","doi":"10.14411/fp.2023.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As presently defined, the tapeworm genus Andrya Railliet, 1895 (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae sensu stricto) includes the type species A. rhopalocephala (Riehm, 1881) in hares of the genus Lepus Linnaeus (Leporidae) in western Eurasia and four species in cricetid (Neotominae, Sigmodontinae) and octodontid rodents in North and South America. The host range of Andrya is puzzling, because it is the only genus of anoplocephalid (s. s.) cestodes parasitising both rodents and lagomorphs. The present morphological analysis shows that the American species of Andrya share multiple consistent features, in which they differ from those of A. rhopalocephala and the morphologically related Neandrya cuniculi (Blanchard, 1891). The main differences concern the position of the uterus with respect to the longitudinal osmoregulatory canals and testes. Consequently, a new genus Andryoides gen. n. is proposed for the American species, resulting in the following combinations: Andryoides neotomae (Voge, 1946) comb. n. (type species), Andryoides octodonensis (Babero et Cattan, 1975) comb. n., Andryoides vesicula (Haverkost et Gardner, 2010) comb. n. and Andryoides boliviensis (Haverkost et Gardner, 2010) comb. n. However, A. boliviensis is regarded here as a junior synonym of A. vesicula (new synonymy). The present study also defines the morphological key features for all the valid genera of cestodes of the family Anoplocephalidae (s. s.), and discusses the phylogenetic affinities and historical biogeography of Andryoides and other endemic American anoplocephalid cestodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55154,"journal":{"name":"Folia Parasitologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Andryoides gen. n. and morphological key features in cestodes of the family Anoplocephalidae sensu stricto (Cyclophyllidea) in mammals.\",\"authors\":\"Voitto Haukisalmi\",\"doi\":\"10.14411/fp.2023.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As presently defined, the tapeworm genus Andrya Railliet, 1895 (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae sensu stricto) includes the type species A. rhopalocephala (Riehm, 1881) in hares of the genus Lepus Linnaeus (Leporidae) in western Eurasia and four species in cricetid (Neotominae, Sigmodontinae) and octodontid rodents in North and South America. The host range of Andrya is puzzling, because it is the only genus of anoplocephalid (s. s.) cestodes parasitising both rodents and lagomorphs. The present morphological analysis shows that the American species of Andrya share multiple consistent features, in which they differ from those of A. rhopalocephala and the morphologically related Neandrya cuniculi (Blanchard, 1891). The main differences concern the position of the uterus with respect to the longitudinal osmoregulatory canals and testes. Consequently, a new genus Andryoides gen. n. is proposed for the American species, resulting in the following combinations: Andryoides neotomae (Voge, 1946) comb. n. (type species), Andryoides octodonensis (Babero et Cattan, 1975) comb. n., Andryoides vesicula (Haverkost et Gardner, 2010) comb. n. and Andryoides boliviensis (Haverkost et Gardner, 2010) comb. n. However, A. boliviensis is regarded here as a junior synonym of A. vesicula (new synonymy). The present study also defines the morphological key features for all the valid genera of cestodes of the family Anoplocephalidae (s. s.), and discusses the phylogenetic affinities and historical biogeography of Andryoides and other endemic American anoplocephalid cestodes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia Parasitologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia Parasitologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2023.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Parasitologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2023.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
根据目前的定义,1895年的Andrya Railliet绦虫属(Cyclophyllidea: anoplocphalidae sensu stricto)包括欧亚大陆西部Lepus Linnaeus (Leporidae)的兔属A. rhopalocephala (Riehm, 1881)的模式种和北美和南美的环虫(Neotominae, Sigmodontinae)和八齿目啮齿动物中的4种。安德里亚的宿主范围令人费解,因为它是唯一一种既寄生于啮齿动物又寄生于狐形动物的无头类(s. s.)绦虫属。目前的形态学分析表明,美洲的安德里亚种具有许多一致的特征,它们与A. rhopalocephala和形态相关的Neandrya cuniculi (Blanchard, 1891)不同。主要的区别在于子宫相对于纵向渗透调节管和睾丸的位置。因此,在美洲种中提出了一个新的属,即雄蚊属(Andryoides gen. n.),其组合如下:n.(模式种),八爪雄蚊(Babero et Cattan, 1975)梳子。n., Andryoides vesicula (Haverkost et Gardner, 2010)梳子。n.和玻利维亚androides (Haverkost et Gardner, 2010)梳子。然而,在这里,a.b oliviensis被认为是a.b vesicula的低级同义(新同义)。本研究还定义了天头虫科所有有效属的形态特征,并讨论了安德里亚属与其他美洲特有天头虫属的系统发育亲缘关系和历史生物地理学。
Andryoides gen. n. and morphological key features in cestodes of the family Anoplocephalidae sensu stricto (Cyclophyllidea) in mammals.
As presently defined, the tapeworm genus Andrya Railliet, 1895 (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae sensu stricto) includes the type species A. rhopalocephala (Riehm, 1881) in hares of the genus Lepus Linnaeus (Leporidae) in western Eurasia and four species in cricetid (Neotominae, Sigmodontinae) and octodontid rodents in North and South America. The host range of Andrya is puzzling, because it is the only genus of anoplocephalid (s. s.) cestodes parasitising both rodents and lagomorphs. The present morphological analysis shows that the American species of Andrya share multiple consistent features, in which they differ from those of A. rhopalocephala and the morphologically related Neandrya cuniculi (Blanchard, 1891). The main differences concern the position of the uterus with respect to the longitudinal osmoregulatory canals and testes. Consequently, a new genus Andryoides gen. n. is proposed for the American species, resulting in the following combinations: Andryoides neotomae (Voge, 1946) comb. n. (type species), Andryoides octodonensis (Babero et Cattan, 1975) comb. n., Andryoides vesicula (Haverkost et Gardner, 2010) comb. n. and Andryoides boliviensis (Haverkost et Gardner, 2010) comb. n. However, A. boliviensis is regarded here as a junior synonym of A. vesicula (new synonymy). The present study also defines the morphological key features for all the valid genera of cestodes of the family Anoplocephalidae (s. s.), and discusses the phylogenetic affinities and historical biogeography of Andryoides and other endemic American anoplocephalid cestodes.
期刊介绍:
FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA, issued in online versions, is an international journal that covers the whole field of general, systematic, ecological and experimental parasitology. It publishes original research papers, research notes and review articles. Contributions from all branches of animal parasitology, such as morphology, taxonomy, biology, biochemistry, physiology, immunology, molecular biology and evolution of parasites, and host-parasite relationships, are eligible. Novelty and importance in the international (not local or regional) context are required. New geographical records of parasites, records of new hosts, regional parasite and/or host surveys (if they constitute the principal substance of manuscript), local/regional prevalence surveys of diseases, local/regional studies on epidemiology of well known diseases and of parasite impact on human/animal health, case reports, routine clinical studies and testing of established diagnostic or treatment procedures, will not be considered. One species description will also not be considered unless they include more general information, such as new diagnostic characters, host-parasite associations, phylogenetic implications, etc. Manuscripts found suitable on submission will be reviewed by at least two reviewers.