性传播疾病有多普遍?

Per-Anders Mårdh
{"title":"性传播疾病有多普遍?","authors":"Per-Anders Mårdh","doi":"10.1016/j.rigp.2004.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present communication highlights some of the shortcomings of current surveillance programs as a base for understanding the prevailing epidemiological picture for sexually transmitted infections, with especial focus on genital chlamydial infections. Suggestions of how to possible improve them are given. It also discusses criteria for screening programs, incl. criteria for so called “selective screening”. The traditional groups for screening are mentioned as well as groups that have so far seldom been suggest to be subjected for such activities. The usefulness of breaking down monitored data from regional or national surveillance systems, specified to individual providers of collected data among private consultations and community clinics, even incl. subunits of the latter, is demonstrated. The difficulty in interpreting the result of diagnostic tests, particular in low-prevalence populations is put forward. The effectiveness of current recommended therapeutic regimens of <em>Chlamydia trachomatis</em> infections are considered in light of the notably high proportion of such recurrent and/or relapsing infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101089,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2004.01.005","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How widespread are STDs?\",\"authors\":\"Per-Anders Mårdh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rigp.2004.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present communication highlights some of the shortcomings of current surveillance programs as a base for understanding the prevailing epidemiological picture for sexually transmitted infections, with especial focus on genital chlamydial infections. Suggestions of how to possible improve them are given. It also discusses criteria for screening programs, incl. criteria for so called “selective screening”. The traditional groups for screening are mentioned as well as groups that have so far seldom been suggest to be subjected for such activities. The usefulness of breaking down monitored data from regional or national surveillance systems, specified to individual providers of collected data among private consultations and community clinics, even incl. subunits of the latter, is demonstrated. The difficulty in interpreting the result of diagnostic tests, particular in low-prevalence populations is put forward. The effectiveness of current recommended therapeutic regimens of <em>Chlamydia trachomatis</em> infections are considered in light of the notably high proportion of such recurrent and/or relapsing infections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 141-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2004.01.005\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471769704000073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471769704000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本通讯强调了当前监测计划的一些缺点,作为了解性传播感染的流行病学概况的基础,特别关注生殖器衣原体感染。并就如何改进提出了建议。它还讨论了筛选方案的标准,包括所谓的“选择性筛选”标准。文中提到了传统的筛查群体以及迄今为止很少被建议进行此类活动的群体。说明了将区域或国家监测系统的监测数据细分为私人咨询和社区诊所(甚至包括后者的子单位)中所收集数据的个别提供者的有用性。提出了解释诊断测试结果的困难,特别是在低流行率人群中。鉴于沙眼衣原体感染复发和/或复发感染的显著高比例,目前推荐的沙眼衣原体感染治疗方案的有效性被考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How widespread are STDs?

The present communication highlights some of the shortcomings of current surveillance programs as a base for understanding the prevailing epidemiological picture for sexually transmitted infections, with especial focus on genital chlamydial infections. Suggestions of how to possible improve them are given. It also discusses criteria for screening programs, incl. criteria for so called “selective screening”. The traditional groups for screening are mentioned as well as groups that have so far seldom been suggest to be subjected for such activities. The usefulness of breaking down monitored data from regional or national surveillance systems, specified to individual providers of collected data among private consultations and community clinics, even incl. subunits of the latter, is demonstrated. The difficulty in interpreting the result of diagnostic tests, particular in low-prevalence populations is put forward. The effectiveness of current recommended therapeutic regimens of Chlamydia trachomatis infections are considered in light of the notably high proportion of such recurrent and/or relapsing infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信