精准教育中的先天vs后天:家长与公众的见解。

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Maya Sabatello, Bree Martin, Thomas Corbeil, Seonjoo Lee, Bruce G Link, Paul S Appelbaum
{"title":"精准教育中的先天vs后天:家长与公众的见解。","authors":"Maya Sabatello,&nbsp;Bree Martin,&nbsp;Thomas Corbeil,&nbsp;Seonjoo Lee,&nbsp;Bruce G Link,&nbsp;Paul S Appelbaum","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2021.1983666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The philosophical debate about the roles of nature versus nurture in human flourishing is not new. But the rise of precision education-a growing field of research that encourages the use of genetic data to inform educational trajectory and interventions to better meet student needs-has renewed historical and ethical concerns. A major worry is that \"genetic hype\" may skew public perceptions toward a deterministic perception of the child's educational trajectory, regardless of the child's capacities, and underestimation of environmental factors affecting educational outcomes. We tested this hypothesis with parents and adults from the general public in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A newly developed computerized implicit association test (IAT) to assess automatic associations between genetics or environments and student behaviors that are associated with educational achievement was administered to samples of parents of children below 21 years old (n = 450) and adults from the general public (n = 419). The samples were representative of the adult US population and adjusted to oversample Black/African American participants. An overall D score for participants' IATs (range: [-2, 2]) was calculated on the basis of the speed of participants' responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean IAT score for both samples indicated stronger association between the quality of being a good student and environment rather than genetics (parents: mean=-0.146, t = -6.56, p < 0.001; general public: mean = -0.249, t = -9.45, p < 0.0001). Younger participants from the general public showed a stronger association between genetics and educational success than middle-aged participants (β = -0.301, p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The views of parents and the general public on behavioral genetics and education are complex but call for investment in creating educational environments that are supportive of student success. Future research is needed to understand differences across age groups and to explore views of other stakeholders involved in determining children's educational trajectories about the roles of nature versus nurture in precision education.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":"13 2","pages":"79-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9083499/pdf/nihms-1766827.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature vs. Nurture in Precision Education: Insights of Parents and the Public.\",\"authors\":\"Maya Sabatello,&nbsp;Bree Martin,&nbsp;Thomas Corbeil,&nbsp;Seonjoo Lee,&nbsp;Bruce G Link,&nbsp;Paul S Appelbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23294515.2021.1983666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The philosophical debate about the roles of nature versus nurture in human flourishing is not new. But the rise of precision education-a growing field of research that encourages the use of genetic data to inform educational trajectory and interventions to better meet student needs-has renewed historical and ethical concerns. A major worry is that \\\"genetic hype\\\" may skew public perceptions toward a deterministic perception of the child's educational trajectory, regardless of the child's capacities, and underestimation of environmental factors affecting educational outcomes. We tested this hypothesis with parents and adults from the general public in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A newly developed computerized implicit association test (IAT) to assess automatic associations between genetics or environments and student behaviors that are associated with educational achievement was administered to samples of parents of children below 21 years old (n = 450) and adults from the general public (n = 419). The samples were representative of the adult US population and adjusted to oversample Black/African American participants. An overall D score for participants' IATs (range: [-2, 2]) was calculated on the basis of the speed of participants' responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean IAT score for both samples indicated stronger association between the quality of being a good student and environment rather than genetics (parents: mean=-0.146, t = -6.56, p < 0.001; general public: mean = -0.249, t = -9.45, p < 0.0001). Younger participants from the general public showed a stronger association between genetics and educational success than middle-aged participants (β = -0.301, p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The views of parents and the general public on behavioral genetics and education are complex but call for investment in creating educational environments that are supportive of student success. Future research is needed to understand differences across age groups and to explore views of other stakeholders involved in determining children's educational trajectories about the roles of nature versus nurture in precision education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB Empirical Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"79-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9083499/pdf/nihms-1766827.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB Empirical Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1983666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1983666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:关于先天与后天在人类繁荣中的作用的哲学辩论并不新鲜。但是,精确教育的兴起——这是一个不断发展的研究领域,鼓励使用基因数据来告知教育轨迹和干预措施,以更好地满足学生的需求——重新引起了历史和伦理上的关注。一个主要的担忧是,“基因炒作”可能会扭曲公众对孩子教育轨迹的确定性认知,而不考虑孩子的能力,并低估影响教育结果的环境因素。我们在美国的父母和成年人中测试了这一假设。方法:采用新开发的计算机内隐联想测验(IAT)对21岁以下儿童的父母(n = 450)和普通公众(n = 419)进行测试,以评估遗传或环境与与教育成就相关的学生行为之间的自动关联。这些样本代表了美国成年人口,并调整了黑人/非裔美国人的样本。根据参与者的反应速度计算出参与者的雅思总分D分(范围:[- 2,2])。结果:两个样本的平均IAT分数表明,做一个好学生的质量与环境之间的联系比遗传之间的联系更强(父母:平均值=-0.146,t = -6.56, p)结论:父母和公众对行为遗传学和教育的看法是复杂的,但呼吁投资创造有利于学生成功的教育环境。未来的研究需要了解不同年龄组之间的差异,并探索参与确定儿童教育轨迹的其他利益相关者的观点,即先天与后天在精确教育中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nature vs. Nurture in Precision Education: Insights of Parents and the Public.

Background: The philosophical debate about the roles of nature versus nurture in human flourishing is not new. But the rise of precision education-a growing field of research that encourages the use of genetic data to inform educational trajectory and interventions to better meet student needs-has renewed historical and ethical concerns. A major worry is that "genetic hype" may skew public perceptions toward a deterministic perception of the child's educational trajectory, regardless of the child's capacities, and underestimation of environmental factors affecting educational outcomes. We tested this hypothesis with parents and adults from the general public in the US.

Methods: A newly developed computerized implicit association test (IAT) to assess automatic associations between genetics or environments and student behaviors that are associated with educational achievement was administered to samples of parents of children below 21 years old (n = 450) and adults from the general public (n = 419). The samples were representative of the adult US population and adjusted to oversample Black/African American participants. An overall D score for participants' IATs (range: [-2, 2]) was calculated on the basis of the speed of participants' responses.

Results: The mean IAT score for both samples indicated stronger association between the quality of being a good student and environment rather than genetics (parents: mean=-0.146, t = -6.56, p < 0.001; general public: mean = -0.249, t = -9.45, p < 0.0001). Younger participants from the general public showed a stronger association between genetics and educational success than middle-aged participants (β = -0.301, p = 0.006).

Conclusion: The views of parents and the general public on behavioral genetics and education are complex but call for investment in creating educational environments that are supportive of student success. Future research is needed to understand differences across age groups and to explore views of other stakeholders involved in determining children's educational trajectories about the roles of nature versus nurture in precision education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信