急性结石性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术后发病率和死亡率的预测:s.p.ri m.a.c.c的结果。研究。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Paola Fugazzola, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Marcello Di Martino, Matteo Tomasoni, Francesca Dal Mas, Fikri M Abu-Zidan, Vanni Agnoletti, Marco Ceresoli, Federico Coccolini, Salomone Di Saverio, Tommaso Dominioni, Camilla Nikita Farè, Simone Frassini, Giulia Gambini, Ari Leppäniemi, Marcello Maestri, Elena Martín-Pérez, Ernest E Moore, Valeria Musella, Andrew B Peitzman, Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez, Benedetta Sargenti, Massimo Sartelli, Jacopo Viganò, Andrea Anderloni, Walter Biffl, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni
{"title":"急性结石性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术后发病率和死亡率的预测:s.p.ri m.a.c.c的结果。研究。","authors":"Paola Fugazzola,&nbsp;Lorenzo Cobianchi,&nbsp;Marcello Di Martino,&nbsp;Matteo Tomasoni,&nbsp;Francesca Dal Mas,&nbsp;Fikri M Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Marco Ceresoli,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Tommaso Dominioni,&nbsp;Camilla Nikita Farè,&nbsp;Simone Frassini,&nbsp;Giulia Gambini,&nbsp;Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Marcello Maestri,&nbsp;Elena Martín-Pérez,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Valeria Musella,&nbsp;Andrew B Peitzman,&nbsp;Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez,&nbsp;Benedetta Sargenti,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Jacopo Viganò,&nbsp;Andrea Anderloni,&nbsp;Walter Biffl,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Less invasive alternatives than early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) treatment have been spreading in recent years. We still lack a reliable tool to select high-risk patients who could benefit from these alternatives. Our study aimed to prospectively validate the Chole-risk score in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing EC for ACC compared with other preoperative risk prediction models.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is a World Society of Emergency Surgery prospective multicenter observational study. From 1st September 2021 to 1st September 2022, 1253 consecutive patients admitted in 79 centers were included. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ACC and to be a candidate for EC. A Cochran-Armitage test of the trend was run to determine whether a linear correlation existed between the Chole-risk score and a complicated postoperative course. To assess the accuracy of the analyzed prediction models-POSSUM Physiological Score (PS), modified Frailty Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), APACHE II score, and ACC severity grade-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to compare the diagnostic abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 30-day major morbidity of 6.6% and 30-day mortality of 1.1% were found. Chole-risk was validated, but POSSUM PS was the best risk prediction model for a complicated course after EC for ACC (in-hospital mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; 30-day mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; in-hospital major morbidity: AUC 0.73, p < 0.001; 30-day major morbidity: AUC 0.70, p < 0.001). POSSUM PS with a cutoff of 25 (defined in our study as a 'Chole-POSSUM' score) was then validated in a separate cohort of patients. It showed a 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for mortality and a 96-97% negative predictive value for major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Chole-risk score was externally validated, but the CHOLE-POSSUM stands as a more accurate prediction model. CHOLE-POSSUM is a reliable tool to stratify patients with ACC into a low-risk group that may represent a safe EC candidate, and a high-risk group, where new minimally invasive endoscopic techniques may find the most useful field of action.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024826/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.\",\"authors\":\"Paola Fugazzola,&nbsp;Lorenzo Cobianchi,&nbsp;Marcello Di Martino,&nbsp;Matteo Tomasoni,&nbsp;Francesca Dal Mas,&nbsp;Fikri M Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Marco Ceresoli,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Tommaso Dominioni,&nbsp;Camilla Nikita Farè,&nbsp;Simone Frassini,&nbsp;Giulia Gambini,&nbsp;Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Marcello Maestri,&nbsp;Elena Martín-Pérez,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Valeria Musella,&nbsp;Andrew B Peitzman,&nbsp;Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez,&nbsp;Benedetta Sargenti,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Jacopo Viganò,&nbsp;Andrea Anderloni,&nbsp;Walter Biffl,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Less invasive alternatives than early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) treatment have been spreading in recent years. We still lack a reliable tool to select high-risk patients who could benefit from these alternatives. Our study aimed to prospectively validate the Chole-risk score in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing EC for ACC compared with other preoperative risk prediction models.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is a World Society of Emergency Surgery prospective multicenter observational study. From 1st September 2021 to 1st September 2022, 1253 consecutive patients admitted in 79 centers were included. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ACC and to be a candidate for EC. A Cochran-Armitage test of the trend was run to determine whether a linear correlation existed between the Chole-risk score and a complicated postoperative course. To assess the accuracy of the analyzed prediction models-POSSUM Physiological Score (PS), modified Frailty Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), APACHE II score, and ACC severity grade-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to compare the diagnostic abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 30-day major morbidity of 6.6% and 30-day mortality of 1.1% were found. Chole-risk was validated, but POSSUM PS was the best risk prediction model for a complicated course after EC for ACC (in-hospital mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; 30-day mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; in-hospital major morbidity: AUC 0.73, p < 0.001; 30-day major morbidity: AUC 0.70, p < 0.001). POSSUM PS with a cutoff of 25 (defined in our study as a 'Chole-POSSUM' score) was then validated in a separate cohort of patients. It showed a 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for mortality and a 96-97% negative predictive value for major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Chole-risk score was externally validated, but the CHOLE-POSSUM stands as a more accurate prediction model. CHOLE-POSSUM is a reliable tool to stratify patients with ACC into a low-risk group that may represent a safe EC candidate, and a high-risk group, where new minimally invasive endoscopic techniques may find the most useful field of action.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:近年来,早期胆囊切除术(EC)治疗急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)的创伤性较小的选择越来越多。我们仍然缺乏一种可靠的工具来选择高危患者,他们可以从这些替代方案中受益。我们的研究旨在前瞻性地验证与其他术前风险预测模型相比,胆管风险评分在预测ACC行EC患者术后并发症方面的作用。方法:spri . m.a.c.c。该研究是世界急诊外科学会的一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。从2021年9月1日至2022年9月1日,纳入了79个中心连续收治的1253例患者。纳入标准为诊断为ACC并为EC的候选者。对趋势进行Cochran-Armitage检验,以确定胆危险评分与复杂的术后过程之间是否存在线性相关性。为了评估所分析的预测模型- possum生理评分(PS)、修正虚弱指数、Charlson合并症指数、美国麻醉医师学会评分(ASA)、APACHE II评分和ACC严重程度分级-的准确性,生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。采用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)比较诊断能力。结果:30天主要发病率为6.6%,30天死亡率为1.1%。结论:胆囊风险评分经外部验证,但CHOLE-POSSUM评分是更为准确的预测模型。CHOLE-POSSUM是一种可靠的工具,可将ACC患者分为低风险组(可能是安全的EC候选者)和高风险组(新的微创内镜技术可能在其中找到最有用的作用领域)。试验注册:ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.

Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.

Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.

Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.

Background: Less invasive alternatives than early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) treatment have been spreading in recent years. We still lack a reliable tool to select high-risk patients who could benefit from these alternatives. Our study aimed to prospectively validate the Chole-risk score in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing EC for ACC compared with other preoperative risk prediction models.

Method: The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is a World Society of Emergency Surgery prospective multicenter observational study. From 1st September 2021 to 1st September 2022, 1253 consecutive patients admitted in 79 centers were included. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ACC and to be a candidate for EC. A Cochran-Armitage test of the trend was run to determine whether a linear correlation existed between the Chole-risk score and a complicated postoperative course. To assess the accuracy of the analyzed prediction models-POSSUM Physiological Score (PS), modified Frailty Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), APACHE II score, and ACC severity grade-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to compare the diagnostic abilities.

Results: A 30-day major morbidity of 6.6% and 30-day mortality of 1.1% were found. Chole-risk was validated, but POSSUM PS was the best risk prediction model for a complicated course after EC for ACC (in-hospital mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; 30-day mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; in-hospital major morbidity: AUC 0.73, p < 0.001; 30-day major morbidity: AUC 0.70, p < 0.001). POSSUM PS with a cutoff of 25 (defined in our study as a 'Chole-POSSUM' score) was then validated in a separate cohort of patients. It showed a 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for mortality and a 96-97% negative predictive value for major complications.

Conclusions: The Chole-risk score was externally validated, but the CHOLE-POSSUM stands as a more accurate prediction model. CHOLE-POSSUM is a reliable tool to stratify patients with ACC into a low-risk group that may represent a safe EC candidate, and a high-risk group, where new minimally invasive endoscopic techniques may find the most useful field of action.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信