动物企业和营销策略之间的相互作用形成了有机多物种农业系统

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Marc Benoit, Guillaume Martin, Lucille Steinmetz, Dephne Ulukan, Gun Bernes, Christopher Brock, Anne De La Foye, Myriam Grillot, Marie-Angelina Magne, Tabea Meischner, Marie Moerman, Leonardo Monteiro, Bernadette Oehen, David Parsons, Riccardo Primi, Lisa Schanz, Christoph Winckler, Bertrand Dumont
{"title":"动物企业和营销策略之间的相互作用形成了有机多物种农业系统","authors":"Marc Benoit,&nbsp;Guillaume Martin,&nbsp;Lucille Steinmetz,&nbsp;Dephne Ulukan,&nbsp;Gun Bernes,&nbsp;Christopher Brock,&nbsp;Anne De La Foye,&nbsp;Myriam Grillot,&nbsp;Marie-Angelina Magne,&nbsp;Tabea Meischner,&nbsp;Marie Moerman,&nbsp;Leonardo Monteiro,&nbsp;Bernadette Oehen,&nbsp;David Parsons,&nbsp;Riccardo Primi,&nbsp;Lisa Schanz,&nbsp;Christoph Winckler,&nbsp;Bertrand Dumont","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00930-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the key ways to improve the sustainability of agricultural systems is through diversification, taking advantage of synergies between farm enterprises. Among diversified systems, multispecies livestock farms with at least two animal enterprises have rarely been studied. We explored 95 organic farms from six countries, accounting for the proportion of animal enterprises, sales management, workforce size, and work organization. The study reveals various types of interactions between animal enterprises. Complementarities were observed between ruminant and monogastric enterprises, particularly fertilizer transfer from monogastric manure to grasslands. Milk production was often associated with on-farm processing and short distribution channels, which enhanced farm viability and reduced its dependency on herd productivity. Eleven out of the 95 farms combined above-average production efficiency, on-farm processing, and the majority of sales in short distribution channels. Their labor productivity converged toward 22 livestock units per annual work unit, regardless of the number of workers. Combining farm structure; livestock production efficiency; social elements, such as the workforce; and sales management led us to distinguish four types of farms: (i) small and very autonomous grassland farms with on-farm processing and short distribution channels; (ii) dairy farms associated with a high-density pig or poultry enterprise, whose feed purchase contributes to high rates of cattle feeding self-sufficiency and stocking rate; (iii) large farms with an extensive, grassland beef enterprise associated with either sheep or monogastrics; and (iv) dairy sheep associated with goat or beef cattle on rangelands, with high added-value products enhancing salaries. This study highlights for the first time the diversity of organic multispecies livestock farms and how consistent patterns of interactions among farm structure, livestock management, sales management, and workforce management shape them. The results are a preliminary basis for designing policy interventions aiming to scale up organic farming and value social assets of diversified and small farms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00930-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interactions between animal enterprises and marketing strategies shape organic multispecies farming systems\",\"authors\":\"Marc Benoit,&nbsp;Guillaume Martin,&nbsp;Lucille Steinmetz,&nbsp;Dephne Ulukan,&nbsp;Gun Bernes,&nbsp;Christopher Brock,&nbsp;Anne De La Foye,&nbsp;Myriam Grillot,&nbsp;Marie-Angelina Magne,&nbsp;Tabea Meischner,&nbsp;Marie Moerman,&nbsp;Leonardo Monteiro,&nbsp;Bernadette Oehen,&nbsp;David Parsons,&nbsp;Riccardo Primi,&nbsp;Lisa Schanz,&nbsp;Christoph Winckler,&nbsp;Bertrand Dumont\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-023-00930-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>One of the key ways to improve the sustainability of agricultural systems is through diversification, taking advantage of synergies between farm enterprises. Among diversified systems, multispecies livestock farms with at least two animal enterprises have rarely been studied. We explored 95 organic farms from six countries, accounting for the proportion of animal enterprises, sales management, workforce size, and work organization. The study reveals various types of interactions between animal enterprises. Complementarities were observed between ruminant and monogastric enterprises, particularly fertilizer transfer from monogastric manure to grasslands. Milk production was often associated with on-farm processing and short distribution channels, which enhanced farm viability and reduced its dependency on herd productivity. Eleven out of the 95 farms combined above-average production efficiency, on-farm processing, and the majority of sales in short distribution channels. Their labor productivity converged toward 22 livestock units per annual work unit, regardless of the number of workers. Combining farm structure; livestock production efficiency; social elements, such as the workforce; and sales management led us to distinguish four types of farms: (i) small and very autonomous grassland farms with on-farm processing and short distribution channels; (ii) dairy farms associated with a high-density pig or poultry enterprise, whose feed purchase contributes to high rates of cattle feeding self-sufficiency and stocking rate; (iii) large farms with an extensive, grassland beef enterprise associated with either sheep or monogastrics; and (iv) dairy sheep associated with goat or beef cattle on rangelands, with high added-value products enhancing salaries. This study highlights for the first time the diversity of organic multispecies livestock farms and how consistent patterns of interactions among farm structure, livestock management, sales management, and workforce management shape them. The results are a preliminary basis for designing policy interventions aiming to scale up organic farming and value social assets of diversified and small farms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00930-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00930-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00930-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高农业系统可持续性的关键途径之一是通过多样化,利用农业企业之间的协同效应。在多样化系统中,对至少有两个畜牧企业的多品种养殖场很少进行研究。我们从动物企业占比、销售管理、员工规模、工作组织四个方面对6个国家的95家有机农场进行了调查。研究揭示了动物企业之间存在多种类型的相互作用。反刍动物和单胃企业之间存在互补性,特别是从单胃粪便向草原的肥料转移。牛奶生产通常与农场加工和较短的分销渠道有关,这提高了农场的生存能力,减少了对畜群生产力的依赖。在95个农场中,有11个农场的生产效率高于平均水平,农场加工,大部分销售都是在短分销渠道中进行的。无论工人人数多少,他们的劳动生产率都趋近于每工作单位年22个牲畜单位。结合农场结构;畜牧生产效率;社会因素,如劳动力;销售管理使我们区分出四种类型的农场:(i)小型且非常自主的草地农场,农场加工,分销渠道短;(ii)与高密度猪或家禽企业有关联的奶牛场,其饲料购买有助于提高牛的饲养自给率和放养率;(iii)大型农场,拥有广泛的草原牛肉企业,与羊或单品饲养有关;(iv)牧场上与山羊或肉牛相关的奶羊,其高附加值产品可提高工资。本研究首次强调了有机多物种养殖场的多样性,以及农场结构、牲畜管理、销售管理和劳动力管理之间一致的相互作用模式如何塑造了它们。研究结果为设计旨在扩大有机农业规模和评估多元化和小型农场社会资产的政策干预提供了初步依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Interactions between animal enterprises and marketing strategies shape organic multispecies farming systems

Interactions between animal enterprises and marketing strategies shape organic multispecies farming systems

One of the key ways to improve the sustainability of agricultural systems is through diversification, taking advantage of synergies between farm enterprises. Among diversified systems, multispecies livestock farms with at least two animal enterprises have rarely been studied. We explored 95 organic farms from six countries, accounting for the proportion of animal enterprises, sales management, workforce size, and work organization. The study reveals various types of interactions between animal enterprises. Complementarities were observed between ruminant and monogastric enterprises, particularly fertilizer transfer from monogastric manure to grasslands. Milk production was often associated with on-farm processing and short distribution channels, which enhanced farm viability and reduced its dependency on herd productivity. Eleven out of the 95 farms combined above-average production efficiency, on-farm processing, and the majority of sales in short distribution channels. Their labor productivity converged toward 22 livestock units per annual work unit, regardless of the number of workers. Combining farm structure; livestock production efficiency; social elements, such as the workforce; and sales management led us to distinguish four types of farms: (i) small and very autonomous grassland farms with on-farm processing and short distribution channels; (ii) dairy farms associated with a high-density pig or poultry enterprise, whose feed purchase contributes to high rates of cattle feeding self-sufficiency and stocking rate; (iii) large farms with an extensive, grassland beef enterprise associated with either sheep or monogastrics; and (iv) dairy sheep associated with goat or beef cattle on rangelands, with high added-value products enhancing salaries. This study highlights for the first time the diversity of organic multispecies livestock farms and how consistent patterns of interactions among farm structure, livestock management, sales management, and workforce management shape them. The results are a preliminary basis for designing policy interventions aiming to scale up organic farming and value social assets of diversified and small farms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信