美国有色人种孕妇和产前护理提供者之间的沟通:一项综合评价。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Amy H. Goh CNM, MPhil, Molly R. Altman CNM, PhD, MPH, Lucinda Canty CNM, PhD, Joyce K. Edmonds PhD, MPH, RN
{"title":"美国有色人种孕妇和产前护理提供者之间的沟通:一项综合评价。","authors":"Amy H. Goh CNM, MPhil,&nbsp;Molly R. Altman CNM, PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Lucinda Canty CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Joyce K. Edmonds PhD, MPH, RN","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Racism and discrimination negatively affect patient–provider communication. Yet, pregnant people of color consistently report being discriminated against, disrespected, and ignored. The purpose of this integrated review was to identify studies that examined communication between pregnant people of color and their prenatal care providers and evaluate the factors and outcomes arising from communication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases for studies published between 2001 and 2023. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported on primary research conducted in the United States, were written in English, and focused on patient–provider communication with a sample that included pregnant people of color, defined as those who self-identified as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latina/x/e, Indigenous, American Indian, Asian, Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific Islander American. Twenty-six articles were included in the review. Relevant data were extracted and compiled into an evidence table. We then applied the rating scale of the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice model to assess the level of evidence and quality of the studies. Themes were identified using a memoing technique and organized into 3 a priori categories: factors, outcomes, and recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two overarching themes emerged from our analysis: racism/discrimination and unmet information needs. Subthemes were then identified as factors, outcomes, or recommendations. Factors included provider behaviors, language barriers, structural barriers, provider type, continuity of care, and fear. Outcome themes were disrespect, trust, decision-making power, missed appointments, and satisfaction with care. Lastly, culturally congruent care, provider training, and workforce development were categorized as recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Inadequate communication between prenatal care providers and pregnant people of color continues to exist. Improving access to midwifery education for people of color can contribute to delivering perinatal care that is culturally and linguistically aligned. Further research about digital prenatal health communication is necessary to ensure equitable prenatal care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13580","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication Between Pregnant People of Color and Prenatal Care Providers in the United States: An Integrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Amy H. Goh CNM, MPhil,&nbsp;Molly R. Altman CNM, PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Lucinda Canty CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Joyce K. Edmonds PhD, MPH, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Racism and discrimination negatively affect patient–provider communication. Yet, pregnant people of color consistently report being discriminated against, disrespected, and ignored. The purpose of this integrated review was to identify studies that examined communication between pregnant people of color and their prenatal care providers and evaluate the factors and outcomes arising from communication.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases for studies published between 2001 and 2023. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported on primary research conducted in the United States, were written in English, and focused on patient–provider communication with a sample that included pregnant people of color, defined as those who self-identified as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latina/x/e, Indigenous, American Indian, Asian, Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific Islander American. Twenty-six articles were included in the review. Relevant data were extracted and compiled into an evidence table. We then applied the rating scale of the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice model to assess the level of evidence and quality of the studies. Themes were identified using a memoing technique and organized into 3 a priori categories: factors, outcomes, and recommendations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two overarching themes emerged from our analysis: racism/discrimination and unmet information needs. Subthemes were then identified as factors, outcomes, or recommendations. Factors included provider behaviors, language barriers, structural barriers, provider type, continuity of care, and fear. Outcome themes were disrespect, trust, decision-making power, missed appointments, and satisfaction with care. Lastly, culturally congruent care, provider training, and workforce development were categorized as recommendations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Inadequate communication between prenatal care providers and pregnant people of color continues to exist. Improving access to midwifery education for people of color can contribute to delivering perinatal care that is culturally and linguistically aligned. Further research about digital prenatal health communication is necessary to ensure equitable prenatal care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13580\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13580\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种族主义和歧视对医患沟通产生负面影响。然而,怀孕的有色人种一直报告受到歧视、不尊重和忽视。本综合综述的目的是确定有色人种孕妇与其产前护理提供者之间沟通的研究,并评估沟通产生的因素和结果。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、CINAHL和PsychINFO数据库中2001年至2023年间发表的研究。如果文章报道了在美国进行的主要研究,用英语写作,并且关注患者与提供者之间的交流,其中包括有色人种孕妇,定义为自认为是黑人、非裔美国人、西班牙裔、拉丁裔/x/e、土著、美洲印第安人、亚洲人、亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和/或太平洋岛民的孕妇。26篇文章被纳入综述。提取相关资料,整理成证据表。然后,我们应用约翰霍普金斯循证实践模型的评分量表来评估证据水平和研究质量。使用记忆技术确定主题,并将其组织为3个先验类别:因素、结果和建议。结果:从我们的分析中出现了两个主要主题:种族主义/歧视和未满足的信息需求。然后将次级主题确定为因素、结果或建议。影响因素包括提供者行为、语言障碍、结构障碍、提供者类型、护理连续性和恐惧。结果主题为不尊重、信任、决策权、错过预约和护理满意度。最后,文化一致性护理、提供者培训和劳动力发展被归类为建议。讨论:产前护理提供者和有色人种孕妇之间的沟通不足仍然存在。改善有色人种获得助产教育的机会有助于提供与文化和语言一致的围产期护理。为了确保公平的产前护理,有必要进一步研究数字产前保健传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Communication Between Pregnant People of Color and Prenatal Care Providers in the United States: An Integrative Review

Communication Between Pregnant People of Color and Prenatal Care Providers in the United States: An Integrative Review

Introduction

Racism and discrimination negatively affect patient–provider communication. Yet, pregnant people of color consistently report being discriminated against, disrespected, and ignored. The purpose of this integrated review was to identify studies that examined communication between pregnant people of color and their prenatal care providers and evaluate the factors and outcomes arising from communication.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases for studies published between 2001 and 2023. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported on primary research conducted in the United States, were written in English, and focused on patient–provider communication with a sample that included pregnant people of color, defined as those who self-identified as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latina/x/e, Indigenous, American Indian, Asian, Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific Islander American. Twenty-six articles were included in the review. Relevant data were extracted and compiled into an evidence table. We then applied the rating scale of the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice model to assess the level of evidence and quality of the studies. Themes were identified using a memoing technique and organized into 3 a priori categories: factors, outcomes, and recommendations.

Results

Two overarching themes emerged from our analysis: racism/discrimination and unmet information needs. Subthemes were then identified as factors, outcomes, or recommendations. Factors included provider behaviors, language barriers, structural barriers, provider type, continuity of care, and fear. Outcome themes were disrespect, trust, decision-making power, missed appointments, and satisfaction with care. Lastly, culturally congruent care, provider training, and workforce development were categorized as recommendations.

Discussion

Inadequate communication between prenatal care providers and pregnant people of color continues to exist. Improving access to midwifery education for people of color can contribute to delivering perinatal care that is culturally and linguistically aligned. Further research about digital prenatal health communication is necessary to ensure equitable prenatal care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信