初级保健临床医生参与社区卫生中心幼儿社会情感健康促进实施策略的选择。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000852
Allison J Carroll, Ashley A Knapp, Juan A Villamar, Nivedita Mohanty, Elaine Coldren, Tania Hossain, Dhanya Limaye, Daniel Mendoza, Mark Minier, Michael Sethi, C Hendricks Brown, Patricia D Franklin, Matthew M Davis, Lauren S Wakschlag, Justin D Smith
{"title":"初级保健临床医生参与社区卫生中心幼儿社会情感健康促进实施策略的选择。","authors":"Allison J Carroll, Ashley A Knapp, Juan A Villamar, Nivedita Mohanty, Elaine Coldren, Tania Hossain, Dhanya Limaye, Daniel Mendoza, Mark Minier, Michael Sethi, C Hendricks Brown, Patricia D Franklin, Matthew M Davis, Lauren S Wakschlag, Justin D Smith","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social-emotional risk for subsequent behavioral health problems can be identified at toddler age, a period where prevention has a heightened impact. This study aimed to meaningfully engage pediatric clinicians, given the emphasis on health promotion and broad reach of primary care, to prepare an Implementation Research Logic Model to guide the implementation of a screening and referral process for toddlers with elevated social-emotional risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using an adaptation of a previously published community partner engagement method, six pediatricians from community health centers (CHCs) comprised a Clinical Partner Work Group. The group was engaged in identifying determinants (barriers/facilitators), selecting and specifying strategies, strategy-determinant matching, a modified Delphi approach for strategy prioritization, and user-centered design methods. The data gathered from individual interviews, two group sessions, and a follow-up survey resulted in a completed Implementation Research Logic Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Clinical Partner Work Group identified 16 determinants, including barriers (e.g., patient access to electronic devices) and facilitators (e.g., clinician buy-in). They then selected and specified 14 strategies, which were prioritized based on ratings of feasibility, effectiveness, and priority. The highest-rated strategies (e.g., integration of the screener into the electronic health record) provided coverage of all identified barriers and comprised the primary implementation strategy \"package\" to be used and tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical partners provided important context and insights for implementation strategy selection and specification to support the implementation of social-emotional risk screening and referral in pediatric primary care. The methodology described herein can improve partner engagement in implementation efforts and increase the likelihood of success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"50-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging primary care clinicians in the selection of implementation strategies for toddler social-emotional health promotion in community health centers.\",\"authors\":\"Allison J Carroll, Ashley A Knapp, Juan A Villamar, Nivedita Mohanty, Elaine Coldren, Tania Hossain, Dhanya Limaye, Daniel Mendoza, Mark Minier, Michael Sethi, C Hendricks Brown, Patricia D Franklin, Matthew M Davis, Lauren S Wakschlag, Justin D Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social-emotional risk for subsequent behavioral health problems can be identified at toddler age, a period where prevention has a heightened impact. This study aimed to meaningfully engage pediatric clinicians, given the emphasis on health promotion and broad reach of primary care, to prepare an Implementation Research Logic Model to guide the implementation of a screening and referral process for toddlers with elevated social-emotional risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using an adaptation of a previously published community partner engagement method, six pediatricians from community health centers (CHCs) comprised a Clinical Partner Work Group. The group was engaged in identifying determinants (barriers/facilitators), selecting and specifying strategies, strategy-determinant matching, a modified Delphi approach for strategy prioritization, and user-centered design methods. The data gathered from individual interviews, two group sessions, and a follow-up survey resulted in a completed Implementation Research Logic Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Clinical Partner Work Group identified 16 determinants, including barriers (e.g., patient access to electronic devices) and facilitators (e.g., clinician buy-in). They then selected and specified 14 strategies, which were prioritized based on ratings of feasibility, effectiveness, and priority. The highest-rated strategies (e.g., integration of the screener into the electronic health record) provided coverage of all identified barriers and comprised the primary implementation strategy \\\"package\\\" to be used and tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical partners provided important context and insights for implementation strategy selection and specification to support the implementation of social-emotional risk screening and referral in pediatric primary care. The methodology described herein can improve partner engagement in implementation efforts and increase the likelihood of success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"50-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090018/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000852\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随后的行为健康问题的社会情绪风险可以在学步期确定,这一时期预防的影响更大。本研究的目的是有意义地吸引儿科临床医生,鉴于强调健康促进和广泛的初级保健,准备一个实施研究逻辑模型,以指导实施筛查和转诊过程的幼儿社会情绪风险升高。方法:采用先前发表的社区合作伙伴参与方法,来自社区卫生中心(CHCs)的六名儿科医生组成了临床合作伙伴工作组。该小组致力于确定决定因素(障碍/促进因素),选择和指定策略,策略-决定因素匹配,改进的德尔菲方法用于策略优先级,以及以用户为中心的设计方法。从个人访谈、两次小组会议和后续调查中收集的数据形成了一个完整的实施研究逻辑模型。结果:临床合作伙伴工作组确定了16个决定因素,包括障碍(例如,患者获得电子设备)和促进因素(例如,临床医生购买)。然后,他们选择并指定了14种策略,这些策略根据可行性、有效性和优先级进行了排序。评价最高的战略(例如,将筛检器纳入电子健康记录)涵盖了所有确定的障碍,并构成了将使用和测试的主要实施战略"一揽子"。结论:临床合作伙伴为实施策略选择和规范提供了重要的背景和见解,以支持在儿科初级保健中实施社会情绪风险筛查和转诊。本文描述的方法可以提高合作伙伴在实施工作中的参与度,并增加成功的可能性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaging primary care clinicians in the selection of implementation strategies for toddler social-emotional health promotion in community health centers.

Background: Social-emotional risk for subsequent behavioral health problems can be identified at toddler age, a period where prevention has a heightened impact. This study aimed to meaningfully engage pediatric clinicians, given the emphasis on health promotion and broad reach of primary care, to prepare an Implementation Research Logic Model to guide the implementation of a screening and referral process for toddlers with elevated social-emotional risk.

Method: Using an adaptation of a previously published community partner engagement method, six pediatricians from community health centers (CHCs) comprised a Clinical Partner Work Group. The group was engaged in identifying determinants (barriers/facilitators), selecting and specifying strategies, strategy-determinant matching, a modified Delphi approach for strategy prioritization, and user-centered design methods. The data gathered from individual interviews, two group sessions, and a follow-up survey resulted in a completed Implementation Research Logic Model.

Results: The Clinical Partner Work Group identified 16 determinants, including barriers (e.g., patient access to electronic devices) and facilitators (e.g., clinician buy-in). They then selected and specified 14 strategies, which were prioritized based on ratings of feasibility, effectiveness, and priority. The highest-rated strategies (e.g., integration of the screener into the electronic health record) provided coverage of all identified barriers and comprised the primary implementation strategy "package" to be used and tested.

Conclusions: Clinical partners provided important context and insights for implementation strategy selection and specification to support the implementation of social-emotional risk screening and referral in pediatric primary care. The methodology described herein can improve partner engagement in implementation efforts and increase the likelihood of success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信