超越服从:使用个性化的教育计划来回答战略问题并改进计划。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Adrienne D Woods, Marie C Ireland, Kimberly A Murphy, Hope Sparks Lancaster
{"title":"超越服从:使用个性化的教育计划来回答战略问题并改进计划。","authors":"Adrienne D Woods, Marie C Ireland, Kimberly A Murphy, Hope Sparks Lancaster","doi":"10.1044/2023_LSHSS-23-00084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The most significant document to ensure effective and compliant design, implementation, monitoring, and enforcement of a program of special education services in the United States is the Individualized Education Program (IEP). Although IEPs have been used to document procedural compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) for individual students, IEPs also provide extensive data that can and should be used by a variety of stakeholders including speech-language pathologists (SLPs), school administrators, and state education agencies to design targeted professional development and collectively improve programs, processes, and outcomes in special education.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We summarize existing literature on the use of IEP data and describe opportunities to use IEP data to analyze individual student service patterns and SLP practice patterns. Aggregated IEP data also provide a robust view of district-wide and state trends in eligibility rates and least restrictive environment settings. Information on current and potential IEP data uses, reflection questions for substantive compliance, and lessons learned from a large-scale analysis of IEP data are provided. These lessons include potential software adjustments to enhance usability as a data source for substantive compliance; program improvement; and monitoring individual, school-wide, and district-wide outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IEP data are a rich data source of information that may be used to (a) identify trends; (b) assist schools, districts, and states with ensuring substantive compliance with IDEA; (c) examine service equity and efficacy; (d) identify professional development needs; and (e) identify promising practices and provide opportunities to use real-time data to improve models and address public policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":" ","pages":"249-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Go Beyond Compliance: Use Individualized Education Programs to Answer Strategic Questions and Improve Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Adrienne D Woods, Marie C Ireland, Kimberly A Murphy, Hope Sparks Lancaster\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2023_LSHSS-23-00084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The most significant document to ensure effective and compliant design, implementation, monitoring, and enforcement of a program of special education services in the United States is the Individualized Education Program (IEP). Although IEPs have been used to document procedural compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) for individual students, IEPs also provide extensive data that can and should be used by a variety of stakeholders including speech-language pathologists (SLPs), school administrators, and state education agencies to design targeted professional development and collectively improve programs, processes, and outcomes in special education.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We summarize existing literature on the use of IEP data and describe opportunities to use IEP data to analyze individual student service patterns and SLP practice patterns. Aggregated IEP data also provide a robust view of district-wide and state trends in eligibility rates and least restrictive environment settings. Information on current and potential IEP data uses, reflection questions for substantive compliance, and lessons learned from a large-scale analysis of IEP data are provided. These lessons include potential software adjustments to enhance usability as a data source for substantive compliance; program improvement; and monitoring individual, school-wide, and district-wide outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IEP data are a rich data source of information that may be used to (a) identify trends; (b) assist schools, districts, and states with ensuring substantive compliance with IDEA; (c) examine service equity and efficacy; (d) identify professional development needs; and (e) identify promising practices and provide opportunities to use real-time data to improve models and address public policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"249-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_LSHSS-23-00084\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_LSHSS-23-00084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最重要的文件,以确保有效和合规的设计,实施,监测,并在美国的特殊教育服务项目的执行是个性化教育计划(IEP)。虽然iep已被用于记录个别学生遵守《残疾人教育法》(IDEA)的程序,但iep也提供了广泛的数据,可以而且应该被各种利益相关者使用,包括语言病理学家(slp)、学校管理人员和州教育机构,以设计有针对性的专业发展,并共同改进特殊教育的计划、过程和结果。方法:我们总结了现有的关于IEP数据使用的文献,并描述了使用IEP数据分析学生个人服务模式和SLP实践模式的机会。综合IEP数据还提供了关于整个地区和州在合格率和限制最少的环境设置方面的趋势的有力视图。提供了关于当前和潜在的国际经济伙伴关系数据使用、实质性遵守的反思问题以及从国际经济伙伴关系数据的大规模分析中吸取的教训的信息。这些经验包括潜在的软件调整,以提高可用性作为实质性遵守的数据源;项目改善;并监测个人、全校和整个地区的成果。结论:IEP数据是丰富的信息数据源,可用于:(a)确定趋势;(b)协助学校、地区和州确保切实遵守IDEA;(c)审查服务的公平性和效率;(d)确定专业发展需要;(e)确定有前途的做法,并提供使用实时数据改进模型和处理公共政策的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Go Beyond Compliance: Use Individualized Education Programs to Answer Strategic Questions and Improve Programs.

Purpose: The most significant document to ensure effective and compliant design, implementation, monitoring, and enforcement of a program of special education services in the United States is the Individualized Education Program (IEP). Although IEPs have been used to document procedural compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) for individual students, IEPs also provide extensive data that can and should be used by a variety of stakeholders including speech-language pathologists (SLPs), school administrators, and state education agencies to design targeted professional development and collectively improve programs, processes, and outcomes in special education.

Method: We summarize existing literature on the use of IEP data and describe opportunities to use IEP data to analyze individual student service patterns and SLP practice patterns. Aggregated IEP data also provide a robust view of district-wide and state trends in eligibility rates and least restrictive environment settings. Information on current and potential IEP data uses, reflection questions for substantive compliance, and lessons learned from a large-scale analysis of IEP data are provided. These lessons include potential software adjustments to enhance usability as a data source for substantive compliance; program improvement; and monitoring individual, school-wide, and district-wide outcomes.

Conclusions: IEP data are a rich data source of information that may be used to (a) identify trends; (b) assist schools, districts, and states with ensuring substantive compliance with IDEA; (c) examine service equity and efficacy; (d) identify professional development needs; and (e) identify promising practices and provide opportunities to use real-time data to improve models and address public policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信