创新社会保健服务以促进公平的儿童和青少年生命过程健康发展:审查和前进路线图。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Patrick Y. Liu MPH , Steve Spiker MGIS , Monique Holguin PhD,LCSW , Adam Schickedanz MD PhD
{"title":"创新社会保健服务以促进公平的儿童和青少年生命过程健康发展:审查和前进路线图。","authors":"Patrick Y. Liu MPH ,&nbsp;Steve Spiker MGIS ,&nbsp;Monique Holguin PhD,LCSW ,&nbsp;Adam Schickedanz MD PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cppeds.2023.101451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recognizing the influence of social determinants<span> on health and development, health care<span> has increasingly advocated for interventions that target upstream factors as part of routine pediatric care delivery. In response, clinic-based social risk screening and referral programs have proliferated wherein patients are screened for health-related social needs (HRSNs, such as food and housing insecurity) and referred to community-based organizations (CBOs) and social service providers to address those needs. In recent years, an array of digital platforms, known as Social Health Access and Referral Platforms (SHARPs), have emerged to facilitate the scale and implementation of these models amidst growing system demand.</span></span></p><p>Recent evidence on the effectiveness of social risk screen and refer models and SHARPs has been mixed, giving researchers pause and calling for more nuanced understanding of the limitations of such models, especially for promoting child and family health. Design thinking informed by the Life-Course Health Development (LCHD) framework provides a particularly useful lens for synthesizing emerging limitations of such models in the pediatric context, given the dynamic and developmentally-driven circumstances that shape family health and well-being in the early life course. By (1) <em>focusing</em> on addressing deficits-based social risks, (2) <em>scoping</em> to act upon narrow, downstream needs, (3) <em>timing</em> to react to social needs that have already caused harm rather than preventing them, and (4) limiting <em>scale</em> to individual-by-individual responses rather than structural and population-wide interventions, the current design of prevailing social risk screen and refer programs fundamentally limits their potential impact and misses opportunities to improve health equity over the life course.</p><p>How can health care, social care, and technology partners move forward in collaboration with families and communities to better support equitable lifelong health and social development? In this narrative review, we will summarize the current design, implementation, and limitations of the predominant social risk screen and refer approach in the context of early childhood and adolescent care delivery. We then will apply LCHD principles to advance and improve on this approach from a reactionary focus towards a Family Journey Model that better supports life course health development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49086,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovations in social health delivery to advance equitable pediatric and adolescent life course health development: A review and roadmap forward\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Y. Liu MPH ,&nbsp;Steve Spiker MGIS ,&nbsp;Monique Holguin PhD,LCSW ,&nbsp;Adam Schickedanz MD PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cppeds.2023.101451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recognizing the influence of social determinants<span> on health and development, health care<span> has increasingly advocated for interventions that target upstream factors as part of routine pediatric care delivery. In response, clinic-based social risk screening and referral programs have proliferated wherein patients are screened for health-related social needs (HRSNs, such as food and housing insecurity) and referred to community-based organizations (CBOs) and social service providers to address those needs. In recent years, an array of digital platforms, known as Social Health Access and Referral Platforms (SHARPs), have emerged to facilitate the scale and implementation of these models amidst growing system demand.</span></span></p><p>Recent evidence on the effectiveness of social risk screen and refer models and SHARPs has been mixed, giving researchers pause and calling for more nuanced understanding of the limitations of such models, especially for promoting child and family health. Design thinking informed by the Life-Course Health Development (LCHD) framework provides a particularly useful lens for synthesizing emerging limitations of such models in the pediatric context, given the dynamic and developmentally-driven circumstances that shape family health and well-being in the early life course. By (1) <em>focusing</em> on addressing deficits-based social risks, (2) <em>scoping</em> to act upon narrow, downstream needs, (3) <em>timing</em> to react to social needs that have already caused harm rather than preventing them, and (4) limiting <em>scale</em> to individual-by-individual responses rather than structural and population-wide interventions, the current design of prevailing social risk screen and refer programs fundamentally limits their potential impact and misses opportunities to improve health equity over the life course.</p><p>How can health care, social care, and technology partners move forward in collaboration with families and communities to better support equitable lifelong health and social development? In this narrative review, we will summarize the current design, implementation, and limitations of the predominant social risk screen and refer approach in the context of early childhood and adolescent care delivery. We then will apply LCHD principles to advance and improve on this approach from a reactionary focus towards a Family Journey Model that better supports life course health development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538544223001001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538544223001001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

认识到社会决定因素对健康和发展的影响,卫生保健越来越多地提倡针对上游因素的干预措施,作为常规儿科护理提供的一部分。作为回应,以诊所为基础的社会风险筛查和转诊项目激增,其中对患者进行健康相关社会需求(HRSNs,如食物和住房不安全)筛查,并将其转介给社区组织(cbo)和社会服务提供者,以解决这些需求。近年来,在不断增长的系统需求中,出现了一系列被称为社会健康访问和转诊平台(SHARPs)的数字平台,以促进这些模式的规模和实施。最近关于社会风险筛选和转诊模型和SHARPs有效性的证据好坏参半,这让研究人员踌躇不前,并呼吁对这些模型的局限性进行更细致的理解,特别是在促进儿童和家庭健康方面。基于生命历程健康发展(LCHD)框架的设计思维提供了一个特别有用的视角,可以综合儿科背景下这些模型的新局限性,因为在生命早期阶段,动态和发展驱动的环境塑造了家庭健康和福祉。通过(1)专注于解决基于赤字的社会风险;(2)根据狭隘的下游需求采取行动;(3)对已经造成伤害而不是预防伤害的社会需求做出反应的时机;(4)将规模限制在个体应对,而不是结构性和全民干预。目前流行的社会风险筛查和转诊项目的设计从根本上限制了它们的潜在影响,并错过了在整个生命过程中改善健康公平的机会。卫生保健、社会保健和技术伙伴如何与家庭和社区合作向前迈进,更好地支持公平的终身健康和社会发展?在这篇叙述性综述中,我们将总结目前主要的社会风险筛查的设计、实施和局限性,并在幼儿和青少年护理提供的背景下参考方法。然后,我们将应用LCHD的原则来推进和改进这种方法,从一个反动的焦点转向一个更好地支持生命过程健康发展的家庭旅程模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovations in social health delivery to advance equitable pediatric and adolescent life course health development: A review and roadmap forward

Recognizing the influence of social determinants on health and development, health care has increasingly advocated for interventions that target upstream factors as part of routine pediatric care delivery. In response, clinic-based social risk screening and referral programs have proliferated wherein patients are screened for health-related social needs (HRSNs, such as food and housing insecurity) and referred to community-based organizations (CBOs) and social service providers to address those needs. In recent years, an array of digital platforms, known as Social Health Access and Referral Platforms (SHARPs), have emerged to facilitate the scale and implementation of these models amidst growing system demand.

Recent evidence on the effectiveness of social risk screen and refer models and SHARPs has been mixed, giving researchers pause and calling for more nuanced understanding of the limitations of such models, especially for promoting child and family health. Design thinking informed by the Life-Course Health Development (LCHD) framework provides a particularly useful lens for synthesizing emerging limitations of such models in the pediatric context, given the dynamic and developmentally-driven circumstances that shape family health and well-being in the early life course. By (1) focusing on addressing deficits-based social risks, (2) scoping to act upon narrow, downstream needs, (3) timing to react to social needs that have already caused harm rather than preventing them, and (4) limiting scale to individual-by-individual responses rather than structural and population-wide interventions, the current design of prevailing social risk screen and refer programs fundamentally limits their potential impact and misses opportunities to improve health equity over the life course.

How can health care, social care, and technology partners move forward in collaboration with families and communities to better support equitable lifelong health and social development? In this narrative review, we will summarize the current design, implementation, and limitations of the predominant social risk screen and refer approach in the context of early childhood and adolescent care delivery. We then will apply LCHD principles to advance and improve on this approach from a reactionary focus towards a Family Journey Model that better supports life course health development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
5 days
期刊介绍: Recognized for its probing, comprehensive, and evidence-based reviews, Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care devotes each issue to a timely and practical topic in pediatric medicine, presented by leading authorities in the field. The journal offers readers easily accessible information that enhances professional experience and is pertinent to daily pediatric practice. Each issue''s review article is accompanied by an additional special feature designed to highlight a particular aspect of the topic presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信