从索赔和自我报告数据估计口腔疾病负担

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Christopher Okunseri BDS, MSc, FFDRCSI, Julie Frantsve-Hawley PhD, Madhuli Thakkar-Samtani BDS, MPH, IIya Okunev MA, Lisa J. Heaton PhD, Eric P. Tranby PhD
{"title":"从索赔和自我报告数据估计口腔疾病负担","authors":"Christopher Okunseri BDS, MSc, FFDRCSI,&nbsp;Julie Frantsve-Hawley PhD,&nbsp;Madhuli Thakkar-Samtani BDS, MPH,&nbsp;IIya Okunev MA,&nbsp;Lisa J. Heaton PhD,&nbsp;Eric P. Tranby PhD","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the use of Medicaid and commercial claims data with self-reported survey data in estimating the prevalence of oral disease burden.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed 2018 Medicaid claims from the IBM Watson Medicaid Marketscan database, commercial claims from the IBM Dental Database, and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. The estimate of oral disease burden was based on standard metrics using periodontal and caries-related Current Dental Terminology (CDT) procedure codes. A direct comparison between the data sets was also done.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Unweighted Medicaid and commercial enrollees were 11.6 and 10.5 million, respectively. The weighted proportion from MEPS for Medicaid and commercial plans ranged from 80 to 208 million people. Estimates of caries-related treatments were calculated from IBM Watson and MEPS data for Medicaid enrollees (13% vs. 12%, respectively) and commercial claims (25% vs. 17%, respectively). Prevalence of periodontal related treatments for those with a dental visit was estimated for IBM Watson and MEPS enrollees for Medicaid (0.7% vs. 0.5%, respectively) and commercial claims (7% vs. 1.6%, respectively). Dental disease estimates were higher in individuals with at least one dental visit across cohorts. Prevalence of disease for those with a dental visit based on specific procedures were higher in commercial plans than in Medicaid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Claims data has the potential to serve as a proxy measure for the estimate of dental disease burden in a population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"83 1","pages":"51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of oral disease burden from claims and self-reported data\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Okunseri BDS, MSc, FFDRCSI,&nbsp;Julie Frantsve-Hawley PhD,&nbsp;Madhuli Thakkar-Samtani BDS, MPH,&nbsp;IIya Okunev MA,&nbsp;Lisa J. Heaton PhD,&nbsp;Eric P. Tranby PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jphd.12550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To compare the use of Medicaid and commercial claims data with self-reported survey data in estimating the prevalence of oral disease burden.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed 2018 Medicaid claims from the IBM Watson Medicaid Marketscan database, commercial claims from the IBM Dental Database, and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. The estimate of oral disease burden was based on standard metrics using periodontal and caries-related Current Dental Terminology (CDT) procedure codes. A direct comparison between the data sets was also done.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Unweighted Medicaid and commercial enrollees were 11.6 and 10.5 million, respectively. The weighted proportion from MEPS for Medicaid and commercial plans ranged from 80 to 208 million people. Estimates of caries-related treatments were calculated from IBM Watson and MEPS data for Medicaid enrollees (13% vs. 12%, respectively) and commercial claims (25% vs. 17%, respectively). Prevalence of periodontal related treatments for those with a dental visit was estimated for IBM Watson and MEPS enrollees for Medicaid (0.7% vs. 0.5%, respectively) and commercial claims (7% vs. 1.6%, respectively). Dental disease estimates were higher in individuals with at least one dental visit across cohorts. Prevalence of disease for those with a dental visit based on specific procedures were higher in commercial plans than in Medicaid.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Claims data has the potential to serve as a proxy measure for the estimate of dental disease burden in a population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health dentistry\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"51-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12550\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较医疗补助和商业索赔数据与自我报告调查数据在估计口腔疾病负担流行率方面的应用。方法:我们分析了IBM Watson Medicaid Marketscan数据库中的2018年医疗补助索赔、IBM牙科数据库中的商业索赔和医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)数据。口腔疾病负担的估计是基于使用与牙周和龋齿相关的现行牙科术语(CDT)程序代码的标准度量。还对数据集进行了直接比较。结果未加权的医疗补助和商业参保人数分别为1160万和1050万。医疗补助和商业计划的MEPS加权比例从8000万到2.08亿不等。根据IBM Watson和MEPS的医疗补助计划参保者(分别为13%和12%)和商业索赔(分别为25%和17%)的数据计算龋齿相关治疗的估计。对IBM Watson和MEPS医疗补助计划参保者(分别为0.7%和0.5%)和商业索赔参保者(分别为7%和1.6%)进行牙周相关治疗的流行率估计。在所有队列中,至少有一次牙科就诊的个体的牙病估计较高。根据特定程序进行牙科检查的患者,商业计划的患病率高于医疗补助计划。结论索赔数据有可能作为估计人群牙病负担的替代措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of oral disease burden from claims and self-reported data

Objective

To compare the use of Medicaid and commercial claims data with self-reported survey data in estimating the prevalence of oral disease burden.

Methods

We analyzed 2018 Medicaid claims from the IBM Watson Medicaid Marketscan database, commercial claims from the IBM Dental Database, and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. The estimate of oral disease burden was based on standard metrics using periodontal and caries-related Current Dental Terminology (CDT) procedure codes. A direct comparison between the data sets was also done.

Results

Unweighted Medicaid and commercial enrollees were 11.6 and 10.5 million, respectively. The weighted proportion from MEPS for Medicaid and commercial plans ranged from 80 to 208 million people. Estimates of caries-related treatments were calculated from IBM Watson and MEPS data for Medicaid enrollees (13% vs. 12%, respectively) and commercial claims (25% vs. 17%, respectively). Prevalence of periodontal related treatments for those with a dental visit was estimated for IBM Watson and MEPS enrollees for Medicaid (0.7% vs. 0.5%, respectively) and commercial claims (7% vs. 1.6%, respectively). Dental disease estimates were higher in individuals with at least one dental visit across cohorts. Prevalence of disease for those with a dental visit based on specific procedures were higher in commercial plans than in Medicaid.

Conclusions

Claims data has the potential to serve as a proxy measure for the estimate of dental disease burden in a population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of public health dentistry
Journal of public health dentistry 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信