局部晚期结直肠癌错配修复缺陷患者新辅助化疗的临床意义:免疫治疗时代可能的残留价值

IF 4.2 3区 医学
Mian Chen, Junguo Chen, Jun Huang, Huashan Liu, Wuteng Cao, Shuangling Luo, Zhanzhen Liu, Huanxin Hu, Sicong Lai, Yujie Hou, Liang Kang, Liang Huang
{"title":"局部晚期结直肠癌错配修复缺陷患者新辅助化疗的临床意义:免疫治疗时代可能的残留价值","authors":"Mian Chen,&nbsp;Junguo Chen,&nbsp;Jun Huang,&nbsp;Huashan Liu,&nbsp;Wuteng Cao,&nbsp;Shuangling Luo,&nbsp;Zhanzhen Liu,&nbsp;Huanxin Hu,&nbsp;Sicong Lai,&nbsp;Yujie Hou,&nbsp;Liang Kang,&nbsp;Liang Huang","doi":"10.1177/17562848221150306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability is one of the well-established molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC). The efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACC) patients with dMMR is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We assessed the tumor response and clinical outcome in LACC patients with dMMR received NAC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, single-center analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2013 to 2018, a total of 577 LACC patients with dMMR who underwent radical surgery were identified. Among them, 109 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were further screened out for analysis. According to whether receiving NAC or not, 109 patients were divided into two groups with the purpose of retrospectively analyzing their characteristics, treatment, and survival results, especially the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were matched between the two groups. One of 40 patients in NAC group recurred, while 13 of 69 patients in non-NAC group recurred. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that NAC (hazard ratio: 0.115; 95% confidence interval: 0.015-0.897; <i>p</i> = 0.039) was independent influence factor for DFS. In NAC group, there were 13/40 (32.5%) patients for tumor regression grade 1 and 27/40 (67.5%) patients converted clinical positive N-stage into negative N-stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, NAC was associated with better tumor downstaging and longer 5-year DFS in LACC patients with dMMR. Consequently, NAC might be an additional treatment choice when it comes to such patients in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":23022,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562848221150306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/ba/10.1177_17562848221150306.PMC9893354.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair: possibly residual value in the era of immunotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Mian Chen,&nbsp;Junguo Chen,&nbsp;Jun Huang,&nbsp;Huashan Liu,&nbsp;Wuteng Cao,&nbsp;Shuangling Luo,&nbsp;Zhanzhen Liu,&nbsp;Huanxin Hu,&nbsp;Sicong Lai,&nbsp;Yujie Hou,&nbsp;Liang Kang,&nbsp;Liang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848221150306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability is one of the well-established molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC). The efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACC) patients with dMMR is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We assessed the tumor response and clinical outcome in LACC patients with dMMR received NAC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, single-center analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2013 to 2018, a total of 577 LACC patients with dMMR who underwent radical surgery were identified. Among them, 109 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were further screened out for analysis. According to whether receiving NAC or not, 109 patients were divided into two groups with the purpose of retrospectively analyzing their characteristics, treatment, and survival results, especially the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were matched between the two groups. One of 40 patients in NAC group recurred, while 13 of 69 patients in non-NAC group recurred. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that NAC (hazard ratio: 0.115; 95% confidence interval: 0.015-0.897; <i>p</i> = 0.039) was independent influence factor for DFS. In NAC group, there were 13/40 (32.5%) patients for tumor regression grade 1 and 27/40 (67.5%) patients converted clinical positive N-stage into negative N-stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, NAC was associated with better tumor downstaging and longer 5-year DFS in LACC patients with dMMR. Consequently, NAC might be an additional treatment choice when it comes to such patients in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"17562848221150306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/ba/10.1177_17562848221150306.PMC9893354.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848221150306\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848221150306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺陷错配修复(dMMR)或微卫星不稳定性是结直肠癌(CRC)中公认的分子生物标志物之一。新辅助化疗(NAC)对局部晚期结直肠癌(LACC) dMMR患者的疗效尚不清楚。目的:我们评估dMMR接受NAC治疗的LACC患者的肿瘤反应和临床结果。设计:回顾性、单中心分析。方法:2013 - 2018年,共577例行根治性手术的LACC dMMR患者。其中,进一步筛选出109例接受辅助化疗的患者进行分析。根据是否接受NAC治疗,将109例患者分为两组,回顾性分析患者的特点、治疗及生存结果,特别是5年无病生存期(DFS)和5年总生存期。结果:两组患者基线特征相符。NAC组40例患者中有1例复发,非NAC组69例患者中有13例复发。单因素和多因素分析显示NAC(风险比:0.115;95%置信区间:0.015-0.897;p = 0.039)是DFS的独立影响因素。NAC组肿瘤消退1级13/40(32.5%),临床阳性n期转为阴性n期27/40(67.5%)。结论:在本研究中,NAC与LACC合并dMMR患者更好的肿瘤降期和更长的5年DFS相关。因此,NAC可能是未来这类患者的额外治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair: possibly residual value in the era of immunotherapy.

Clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair: possibly residual value in the era of immunotherapy.

Clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair: possibly residual value in the era of immunotherapy.

Clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair: possibly residual value in the era of immunotherapy.

Background: Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability is one of the well-established molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC). The efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACC) patients with dMMR is unclear.

Objectives: We assessed the tumor response and clinical outcome in LACC patients with dMMR received NAC.

Design: Retrospective, single-center analysis.

Methods: From 2013 to 2018, a total of 577 LACC patients with dMMR who underwent radical surgery were identified. Among them, 109 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were further screened out for analysis. According to whether receiving NAC or not, 109 patients were divided into two groups with the purpose of retrospectively analyzing their characteristics, treatment, and survival results, especially the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival.

Results: Baseline characteristics were matched between the two groups. One of 40 patients in NAC group recurred, while 13 of 69 patients in non-NAC group recurred. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that NAC (hazard ratio: 0.115; 95% confidence interval: 0.015-0.897; p = 0.039) was independent influence factor for DFS. In NAC group, there were 13/40 (32.5%) patients for tumor regression grade 1 and 27/40 (67.5%) patients converted clinical positive N-stage into negative N-stage.

Conclusion: In this study, NAC was associated with better tumor downstaging and longer 5-year DFS in LACC patients with dMMR. Consequently, NAC might be an additional treatment choice when it comes to such patients in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信