仪式化的世界关系:儒家对罗莎共鸣局限的批判。

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Geir Sigurðsson, Paul J D'Ambrosio
{"title":"仪式化的世界关系:儒家对罗莎共鸣局限的批判。","authors":"Geir Sigurðsson,&nbsp;Paul J D'Ambrosio","doi":"10.1186/s40711-023-00184-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hartmut Rosa argues that our modern and post-modern societies can be understood through the notion of dynamic stabilization-institutions require growth to maintain themselves. Part of the impetus behind the acceleration that drives dynamic stabilization is the desire to make the world more available, attainable, and accessible. On both the institutional and individual levels, this is translated into making the world more within our reach, more engineerable, predictable, and controllable. Paradoxically, success in these areas is often accompanied by the world becoming increasingly silent, cold, and unresponsive. We feel alienated or that our world relation has failed. Rosa's solution is to reestablish resonance with the world. In this paper, we argue that his notion of resonance depends on a degree of atomic agency that muffles its own efficacy. The Confucian notion of ritual offers a more dispersed notion of agency. Rather than seeing oneself, others, and the world as distinct agents or indivisible entities, a ritualized approach sees them as mutually constitutive. It is true even on the level of agency, which drastically changes our relationship with the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":52168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ritualized world relations: a Confucian critique of Rosa's limitations on resonance.\",\"authors\":\"Geir Sigurðsson,&nbsp;Paul J D'Ambrosio\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40711-023-00184-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hartmut Rosa argues that our modern and post-modern societies can be understood through the notion of dynamic stabilization-institutions require growth to maintain themselves. Part of the impetus behind the acceleration that drives dynamic stabilization is the desire to make the world more available, attainable, and accessible. On both the institutional and individual levels, this is translated into making the world more within our reach, more engineerable, predictable, and controllable. Paradoxically, success in these areas is often accompanied by the world becoming increasingly silent, cold, and unresponsive. We feel alienated or that our world relation has failed. Rosa's solution is to reestablish resonance with the world. In this paper, we argue that his notion of resonance depends on a degree of atomic agency that muffles its own efficacy. The Confucian notion of ritual offers a more dispersed notion of agency. Rather than seeing oneself, others, and the world as distinct agents or indivisible entities, a ritualized approach sees them as mutually constitutive. It is true even on the level of agency, which drastically changes our relationship with the world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00184-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00184-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哈特穆特·罗莎认为,我们的现代和后现代社会可以通过动态稳定的概念来理解——机构需要增长来维持自身。推动动态稳定的加速背后的部分动力是让世界变得更容易获得、更容易获得和更容易接近的愿望。在机构和个人层面上,这都转化为使世界更触手可及、更可工程、更可预测、更可控。矛盾的是,这些领域的成功往往伴随着世界变得越来越沉默、冷漠和无动于衷。我们感到疏离,或者我们的世界关系已经失败。罗莎的解决办法是重建与世界的共鸣。在本文中,我们认为他的共振概念依赖于某种程度的原子作用,这种作用掩盖了它自身的效力。儒家的仪式观念提供了一种更为分散的能动性观念。而不是将自己,他人和世界视为不同的代理人或不可分割的实体,仪式化的方法将它们视为相互构成的。甚至在代理层面上也是如此,这极大地改变了我们与世界的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ritualized world relations: a Confucian critique of Rosa's limitations on resonance.

Hartmut Rosa argues that our modern and post-modern societies can be understood through the notion of dynamic stabilization-institutions require growth to maintain themselves. Part of the impetus behind the acceleration that drives dynamic stabilization is the desire to make the world more available, attainable, and accessible. On both the institutional and individual levels, this is translated into making the world more within our reach, more engineerable, predictable, and controllable. Paradoxically, success in these areas is often accompanied by the world becoming increasingly silent, cold, and unresponsive. We feel alienated or that our world relation has failed. Rosa's solution is to reestablish resonance with the world. In this paper, we argue that his notion of resonance depends on a degree of atomic agency that muffles its own efficacy. The Confucian notion of ritual offers a more dispersed notion of agency. Rather than seeing oneself, others, and the world as distinct agents or indivisible entities, a ritualized approach sees them as mutually constitutive. It is true even on the level of agency, which drastically changes our relationship with the world.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Sociology
Journal of Chinese Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信