Christoph Vögtlin, Georg Schulz, Kurt Jäger, Bert Müller
{"title":"基于数字口腔内扫描仪的主模型与传统石膏模型的准确性比较","authors":"Christoph Vögtlin, Georg Schulz, Kurt Jäger, Bert Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.phmed.2016.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For the fabrication of dental inlays and crowns precise information on patients' teeth morphology is required. Besides the conventional method, where mold materials impressions are prepared, the use of digital scanners is more and more becoming a central part in the nowadays dentistry. The aim of the manuscript is to compare the accuracy of master models based on two intra-oral digital scanners and silicone impressions. A metal cast reference arch model with predefined measurement points was scanned using the Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. and the iTero™ Intraoral Scanner respectively. These scans were applied for the fabrication of models using rapid prototyping and milling from a proprietary resin. In addition, plaster models were produced using conventional A-silicone impressions. Using a coordinate measuring machine and a micro computed tomography scanner the models were evaluated with micrometer precision. The mean distance deviations from model to model correspond to 112 μm (C.O.S.), 50 μm (iTero™) and 16 μm (gypsum). The results verified the high precision of the conventional technique based on A-silicone impressions and plaster models. The accuracy of the master models obtained on the basis of the digital scans is clinically sufficient to fabricate bridges with up to four units.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37787,"journal":{"name":"Physics in Medicine","volume":"1 ","pages":"Pages 20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.phmed.2016.04.002","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the accuracy of master models based on digital intra-oral scanners with conventional plaster casts\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Vögtlin, Georg Schulz, Kurt Jäger, Bert Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phmed.2016.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>For the fabrication of dental inlays and crowns precise information on patients' teeth morphology is required. Besides the conventional method, where mold materials impressions are prepared, the use of digital scanners is more and more becoming a central part in the nowadays dentistry. The aim of the manuscript is to compare the accuracy of master models based on two intra-oral digital scanners and silicone impressions. A metal cast reference arch model with predefined measurement points was scanned using the Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. and the iTero™ Intraoral Scanner respectively. These scans were applied for the fabrication of models using rapid prototyping and milling from a proprietary resin. In addition, plaster models were produced using conventional A-silicone impressions. Using a coordinate measuring machine and a micro computed tomography scanner the models were evaluated with micrometer precision. The mean distance deviations from model to model correspond to 112 μm (C.O.S.), 50 μm (iTero™) and 16 μm (gypsum). The results verified the high precision of the conventional technique based on A-silicone impressions and plaster models. The accuracy of the master models obtained on the basis of the digital scans is clinically sufficient to fabricate bridges with up to four units.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.phmed.2016.04.002\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352451016300038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352451016300038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing the accuracy of master models based on digital intra-oral scanners with conventional plaster casts
For the fabrication of dental inlays and crowns precise information on patients' teeth morphology is required. Besides the conventional method, where mold materials impressions are prepared, the use of digital scanners is more and more becoming a central part in the nowadays dentistry. The aim of the manuscript is to compare the accuracy of master models based on two intra-oral digital scanners and silicone impressions. A metal cast reference arch model with predefined measurement points was scanned using the Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. and the iTero™ Intraoral Scanner respectively. These scans were applied for the fabrication of models using rapid prototyping and milling from a proprietary resin. In addition, plaster models were produced using conventional A-silicone impressions. Using a coordinate measuring machine and a micro computed tomography scanner the models were evaluated with micrometer precision. The mean distance deviations from model to model correspond to 112 μm (C.O.S.), 50 μm (iTero™) and 16 μm (gypsum). The results verified the high precision of the conventional technique based on A-silicone impressions and plaster models. The accuracy of the master models obtained on the basis of the digital scans is clinically sufficient to fabricate bridges with up to four units.
期刊介绍:
The scope of Physics in Medicine consists of the application of theoretical and practical physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: Physics of Imaging Ultrasonic imaging, Optical imaging, X-ray imaging, Fluorescence Physics of Electromagnetics Neural Engineering, Signal analysis in Medicine, Electromagnetics and the nerve system, Quantum Electronics Physics of Therapy Ultrasonic therapy, Vibrational medicine, Laser Physics Physics of Materials and Mechanics Physics of impact and injuries, Physics of proteins, Metamaterials, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Biomedical Materials, Physics of vascular and cerebrovascular diseases, Micromechanics and Micro engineering, Microfluidics in medicine, Mechanics of the human body, Rotary molecular motors, Biological physics, Physics of bio fabrication and regenerative medicine Physics of Instrumentation Engineering of instruments, Physical effects of the application of instruments, Measurement Science and Technology, Physics of micro-labs and bioanalytical sensor devices, Optical instrumentation, Ultrasound instruments Physics of Hearing and Seeing Acoustics and hearing, Physics of hearing aids, Optics and vision, Physics of vision aids Physics of Space Medicine Space physiology, Space medicine related Physics.