重症监护中的高龄外科人群:临床特征和结果

IF 1 Q3 Medicine
Diana de Jesus Neves Silva , Luís Guilherme Galego Casimiro , Mónica Isabel Sequeira de Oliveira , Luciana Brás da Cunha Ferreira , Fernando José Pereira Alves Abelha
{"title":"重症监护中的高龄外科人群:临床特征和结果","authors":"Diana de Jesus Neves Silva ,&nbsp;Luís Guilherme Galego Casimiro ,&nbsp;Mónica Isabel Sequeira de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Luciana Brás da Cunha Ferreira ,&nbsp;Fernando José Pereira Alves Abelha","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2019.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The elderly population is an especially heterogeneous group of patients with a rising number of surgical interventions being performed in the very elderly patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between different age strata and functional status with the surgical outcome of the elderly patient.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study conducted in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU), between 2006 and 2013. A total of 2331 surgical patients ≥ 65 years old were included. Patients were grouped according to age: Older Elderly Group (OEG: 65‐85 years old); Very Elderly Group (VEG &gt; 85 years old). Demographic and perioperative data were recorded. Revised Cardiac Risk Index, APACHE II and SAPS II scores were calculated and postoperative complications were documented. Variables were compared on univariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The incidence of the VEG was 5.4%. This group had a higher proportion of non‐elective surgery (22.4% vs. 11.2%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), higher APACHE II (12.0 vs. 10.0, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and SAPS II (26.6 vs. 22.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) scores, higher incidence of organ failure (24.6% vs. 17.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.048) and a higher mortality rate during SICU (14.0% vs. 5.2%, <em>p</em> = 0.026) and hospital stay (9.3% vs. 5.0%, <em>p</em> = 0.012).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found that very elderly patients represented a significant proportion of patients admitted to the SICU. They had higher severity scores with a higher prevalence of organ failure and were more likely to undergo non‐elective surgery. They had worse outcomes in regarding mortality during SICU and hospital stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.10.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A população cirúrgica muito idosa em cuidados intensivos: características clínicas e desfechos\",\"authors\":\"Diana de Jesus Neves Silva ,&nbsp;Luís Guilherme Galego Casimiro ,&nbsp;Mónica Isabel Sequeira de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Luciana Brás da Cunha Ferreira ,&nbsp;Fernando José Pereira Alves Abelha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjan.2019.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The elderly population is an especially heterogeneous group of patients with a rising number of surgical interventions being performed in the very elderly patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between different age strata and functional status with the surgical outcome of the elderly patient.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study conducted in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU), between 2006 and 2013. A total of 2331 surgical patients ≥ 65 years old were included. Patients were grouped according to age: Older Elderly Group (OEG: 65‐85 years old); Very Elderly Group (VEG &gt; 85 years old). Demographic and perioperative data were recorded. Revised Cardiac Risk Index, APACHE II and SAPS II scores were calculated and postoperative complications were documented. Variables were compared on univariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The incidence of the VEG was 5.4%. This group had a higher proportion of non‐elective surgery (22.4% vs. 11.2%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), higher APACHE II (12.0 vs. 10.0, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and SAPS II (26.6 vs. 22.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) scores, higher incidence of organ failure (24.6% vs. 17.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.048) and a higher mortality rate during SICU (14.0% vs. 5.2%, <em>p</em> = 0.026) and hospital stay (9.3% vs. 5.0%, <em>p</em> = 0.012).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found that very elderly patients represented a significant proportion of patients admitted to the SICU. They had higher severity scores with a higher prevalence of organ failure and were more likely to undergo non‐elective surgery. They had worse outcomes in regarding mortality during SICU and hospital stay.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709418305324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709418305324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

老年人群是一个特别异质性的患者群体,越来越多的老年患者接受手术干预。本研究的目的是评估不同年龄层和功能状态与老年患者手术结果的相关性。方法回顾性队列研究于2006年至2013年在某外科重症监护病房(SICU)进行。共纳入2331例年龄≥65岁的外科患者。患者按年龄分组:老年组(OEG: 65 ~ 85岁);高龄组别(VEG >85岁)。记录人口统计学和围手术期数据。计算修订后的心脏风险指数、APACHE II和SAPS II评分,并记录术后并发症。采用单因素分析对变量进行比较。结果VEG的发生率为5.4%。该组非择期手术比例较高(22.4%比11.2%,p <0.001),较高的APACHE II (12.0 vs. 10.0, p <0.001)和SAPS II (26.6 vs. 22.2, p <0.001)评分、更高的器官衰竭发生率(24.6%比17.6%,p = 0.048)、SICU期间(14.0%比5.2%,p = 0.026)和住院期间(9.3%比5.0%,p = 0.012)更高的死亡率。结论我们发现高龄患者在SICU住院患者中占很大比例。他们的严重程度评分更高,器官衰竭的患病率更高,更有可能接受非选择性手术。他们在SICU和住院期间的死亡率方面的结果更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A população cirúrgica muito idosa em cuidados intensivos: características clínicas e desfechos

Background

The elderly population is an especially heterogeneous group of patients with a rising number of surgical interventions being performed in the very elderly patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between different age strata and functional status with the surgical outcome of the elderly patient.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study conducted in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU), between 2006 and 2013. A total of 2331 surgical patients ≥ 65 years old were included. Patients were grouped according to age: Older Elderly Group (OEG: 65‐85 years old); Very Elderly Group (VEG > 85 years old). Demographic and perioperative data were recorded. Revised Cardiac Risk Index, APACHE II and SAPS II scores were calculated and postoperative complications were documented. Variables were compared on univariate analysis.

Results

The incidence of the VEG was 5.4%. This group had a higher proportion of non‐elective surgery (22.4% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001), higher APACHE II (12.0 vs. 10.0, p < 0.001) and SAPS II (26.6 vs. 22.2, p < 0.001) scores, higher incidence of organ failure (24.6% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.048) and a higher mortality rate during SICU (14.0% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.026) and hospital stay (9.3% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.012).

Conclusion

We found that very elderly patients represented a significant proportion of patients admitted to the SICU. They had higher severity scores with a higher prevalence of organ failure and were more likely to undergo non‐elective surgery. They had worse outcomes in regarding mortality during SICU and hospital stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories: -Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)- Clinical information (case reports)- Reviews- Letters to the Editor- Editorials. The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician. The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信