Diana de Jesus Neves Silva , Luís Guilherme Galego Casimiro , Mónica Isabel Sequeira de Oliveira , Luciana Brás da Cunha Ferreira , Fernando José Pereira Alves Abelha
{"title":"重症监护中的高龄外科人群:临床特征和结果","authors":"Diana de Jesus Neves Silva , Luís Guilherme Galego Casimiro , Mónica Isabel Sequeira de Oliveira , Luciana Brás da Cunha Ferreira , Fernando José Pereira Alves Abelha","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2019.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The elderly population is an especially heterogeneous group of patients with a rising number of surgical interventions being performed in the very elderly patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between different age strata and functional status with the surgical outcome of the elderly patient.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study conducted in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU), between 2006 and 2013. A total of 2331 surgical patients ≥ 65 years old were included. Patients were grouped according to age: Older Elderly Group (OEG: 65‐85 years old); Very Elderly Group (VEG > 85 years old). Demographic and perioperative data were recorded. Revised Cardiac Risk Index, APACHE II and SAPS II scores were calculated and postoperative complications were documented. Variables were compared on univariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The incidence of the VEG was 5.4%. This group had a higher proportion of non‐elective surgery (22.4% vs. 11.2%, <em>p</em> < 0.001), higher APACHE II (12.0 vs. 10.0, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and SAPS II (26.6 vs. 22.2, <em>p</em> < 0.001) scores, higher incidence of organ failure (24.6% vs. 17.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.048) and a higher mortality rate during SICU (14.0% vs. 5.2%, <em>p</em> = 0.026) and hospital stay (9.3% vs. 5.0%, <em>p</em> = 0.012).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found that very elderly patients represented a significant proportion of patients admitted to the SICU. They had higher severity scores with a higher prevalence of organ failure and were more likely to undergo non‐elective surgery. They had worse outcomes in regarding mortality during SICU and hospital stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.10.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A população cirúrgica muito idosa em cuidados intensivos: características clínicas e desfechos\",\"authors\":\"Diana de Jesus Neves Silva , Luís Guilherme Galego Casimiro , Mónica Isabel Sequeira de Oliveira , Luciana Brás da Cunha Ferreira , Fernando José Pereira Alves Abelha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjan.2019.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The elderly population is an especially heterogeneous group of patients with a rising number of surgical interventions being performed in the very elderly patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between different age strata and functional status with the surgical outcome of the elderly patient.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study conducted in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU), between 2006 and 2013. A total of 2331 surgical patients ≥ 65 years old were included. Patients were grouped according to age: Older Elderly Group (OEG: 65‐85 years old); Very Elderly Group (VEG > 85 years old). Demographic and perioperative data were recorded. Revised Cardiac Risk Index, APACHE II and SAPS II scores were calculated and postoperative complications were documented. Variables were compared on univariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The incidence of the VEG was 5.4%. This group had a higher proportion of non‐elective surgery (22.4% vs. 11.2%, <em>p</em> < 0.001), higher APACHE II (12.0 vs. 10.0, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and SAPS II (26.6 vs. 22.2, <em>p</em> < 0.001) scores, higher incidence of organ failure (24.6% vs. 17.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.048) and a higher mortality rate during SICU (14.0% vs. 5.2%, <em>p</em> = 0.026) and hospital stay (9.3% vs. 5.0%, <em>p</em> = 0.012).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found that very elderly patients represented a significant proportion of patients admitted to the SICU. They had higher severity scores with a higher prevalence of organ failure and were more likely to undergo non‐elective surgery. They had worse outcomes in regarding mortality during SICU and hospital stay.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709418305324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709418305324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
老年人群是一个特别异质性的患者群体,越来越多的老年患者接受手术干预。本研究的目的是评估不同年龄层和功能状态与老年患者手术结果的相关性。方法回顾性队列研究于2006年至2013年在某外科重症监护病房(SICU)进行。共纳入2331例年龄≥65岁的外科患者。患者按年龄分组:老年组(OEG: 65 ~ 85岁);高龄组别(VEG >85岁)。记录人口统计学和围手术期数据。计算修订后的心脏风险指数、APACHE II和SAPS II评分,并记录术后并发症。采用单因素分析对变量进行比较。结果VEG的发生率为5.4%。该组非择期手术比例较高(22.4%比11.2%,p <0.001),较高的APACHE II (12.0 vs. 10.0, p <0.001)和SAPS II (26.6 vs. 22.2, p <0.001)评分、更高的器官衰竭发生率(24.6%比17.6%,p = 0.048)、SICU期间(14.0%比5.2%,p = 0.026)和住院期间(9.3%比5.0%,p = 0.012)更高的死亡率。结论我们发现高龄患者在SICU住院患者中占很大比例。他们的严重程度评分更高,器官衰竭的患病率更高,更有可能接受非选择性手术。他们在SICU和住院期间的死亡率方面的结果更差。
A população cirúrgica muito idosa em cuidados intensivos: características clínicas e desfechos
Background
The elderly population is an especially heterogeneous group of patients with a rising number of surgical interventions being performed in the very elderly patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between different age strata and functional status with the surgical outcome of the elderly patient.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study conducted in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU), between 2006 and 2013. A total of 2331 surgical patients ≥ 65 years old were included. Patients were grouped according to age: Older Elderly Group (OEG: 65‐85 years old); Very Elderly Group (VEG > 85 years old). Demographic and perioperative data were recorded. Revised Cardiac Risk Index, APACHE II and SAPS II scores were calculated and postoperative complications were documented. Variables were compared on univariate analysis.
Results
The incidence of the VEG was 5.4%. This group had a higher proportion of non‐elective surgery (22.4% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001), higher APACHE II (12.0 vs. 10.0, p < 0.001) and SAPS II (26.6 vs. 22.2, p < 0.001) scores, higher incidence of organ failure (24.6% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.048) and a higher mortality rate during SICU (14.0% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.026) and hospital stay (9.3% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.012).
Conclusion
We found that very elderly patients represented a significant proportion of patients admitted to the SICU. They had higher severity scores with a higher prevalence of organ failure and were more likely to undergo non‐elective surgery. They had worse outcomes in regarding mortality during SICU and hospital stay.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories:
-Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)-
Clinical information (case reports)-
Reviews-
Letters to the Editor-
Editorials.
The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician.
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.