Claire Houziel , Emmanuel Prothon , Albert Trinh-Duc
{"title":"一般实践的碳足迹:法国农村部门全科医生办公室的回顾性案例研究","authors":"Claire Houziel , Emmanuel Prothon , Albert Trinh-Duc","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>The medical sector has a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions which, in turn, impacts global health. In the context of the climate emergency, measures should be adopted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the health care sector. So far, few regulations have been implemented for general practice facilities, despite the fact that the potential impact of general practice is large, due to the size of this sector. This study seeks to establish the carbon footprint of general practices in a rural French department, and to identify the main vectors of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Three general practitioners’ offices located in Lot-et-Garonne agreed to participate in this study. This retrospective study extrapolated the carbon footprint of the practices during 2020 using the ADEME BEGES method and Life Cycle Assessment. We collected data and accounting reports directly from practices regarding different potential CO<sub>2</sub> emission sources (electricity, water, transport, waste, digital activities, stationery, and medical equipment).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Medical practices emitted an average of 39.8t of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent in 2020, i.e. 1.5 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>eq per consultation. Transportation was the main vector of emissions with 95 % of the total (83 % via patient transportation and 12 % via physician transportation), followed by medical equipment (3 %), electricity consumption (1.1 %), office supplies (0.7 %), digital activities (0.1 %), then water and waste (both, < 0.1 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>General Practice generates a significant amount of CO<sub>2</sub> and, therefore, requires specific actions to be implemented to reduce its impact on the environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822300072X/pdfft?md5=4162d665038e9b99436144a7ef614fed&pid=1-s2.0-S266727822300072X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon footprint of general practice: Retrospective case study of GP offices in a rural department of France\",\"authors\":\"Claire Houziel , Emmanuel Prothon , Albert Trinh-Duc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>The medical sector has a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions which, in turn, impacts global health. In the context of the climate emergency, measures should be adopted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the health care sector. So far, few regulations have been implemented for general practice facilities, despite the fact that the potential impact of general practice is large, due to the size of this sector. This study seeks to establish the carbon footprint of general practices in a rural French department, and to identify the main vectors of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Three general practitioners’ offices located in Lot-et-Garonne agreed to participate in this study. This retrospective study extrapolated the carbon footprint of the practices during 2020 using the ADEME BEGES method and Life Cycle Assessment. We collected data and accounting reports directly from practices regarding different potential CO<sub>2</sub> emission sources (electricity, water, transport, waste, digital activities, stationery, and medical equipment).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Medical practices emitted an average of 39.8t of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent in 2020, i.e. 1.5 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>eq per consultation. Transportation was the main vector of emissions with 95 % of the total (83 % via patient transportation and 12 % via physician transportation), followed by medical equipment (3 %), electricity consumption (1.1 %), office supplies (0.7 %), digital activities (0.1 %), then water and waste (both, < 0.1 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>General Practice generates a significant amount of CO<sub>2</sub> and, therefore, requires specific actions to be implemented to reduce its impact on the environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822300072X/pdfft?md5=4162d665038e9b99436144a7ef614fed&pid=1-s2.0-S266727822300072X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822300072X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822300072X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
医疗部门对温室气体排放有重大影响,而温室气体排放反过来又影响全球健康。在气候紧急情况的背景下,应采取措施减少卫生保健部门的温室气体排放。到目前为止,针对全科医疗设施实施的法规很少,尽管由于该行业的规模,全科医疗的潜在影响很大。本研究旨在建立法国农村部门一般做法的碳足迹,并确定二氧化碳排放的主要载体。材料与方法位于Lot-et-Garonne的三家全科医生办公室同意参与本研究。这项回顾性研究使用ADEME BEGES方法和生命周期评估来推断2020年期间这些实践的碳足迹。我们直接从不同的潜在二氧化碳排放源(电力、水、交通、废物、数字活动、文具和医疗设备)的实践中收集数据和会计报告。结果2020年医疗实践平均排放39.8t CO2当量,即每次咨询1.5 kg CO2当量。交通运输是主要的排放载体,占总排放量的95%(83%通过患者运输,12%通过医生运输),其次是医疗设备(3%),电力消耗(1.1%),办公用品(0.7%),数字活动(0.1%),然后是水和废物(两者都是,<0.1%)。一般实践产生大量的二氧化碳,因此,需要采取具体行动来减少其对环境的影响。
Carbon footprint of general practice: Retrospective case study of GP offices in a rural department of France
Context
The medical sector has a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions which, in turn, impacts global health. In the context of the climate emergency, measures should be adopted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the health care sector. So far, few regulations have been implemented for general practice facilities, despite the fact that the potential impact of general practice is large, due to the size of this sector. This study seeks to establish the carbon footprint of general practices in a rural French department, and to identify the main vectors of CO2 emissions.
Materials and Methods
Three general practitioners’ offices located in Lot-et-Garonne agreed to participate in this study. This retrospective study extrapolated the carbon footprint of the practices during 2020 using the ADEME BEGES method and Life Cycle Assessment. We collected data and accounting reports directly from practices regarding different potential CO2 emission sources (electricity, water, transport, waste, digital activities, stationery, and medical equipment).
Results
Medical practices emitted an average of 39.8t of CO2 equivalent in 2020, i.e. 1.5 kg of CO2eq per consultation. Transportation was the main vector of emissions with 95 % of the total (83 % via patient transportation and 12 % via physician transportation), followed by medical equipment (3 %), electricity consumption (1.1 %), office supplies (0.7 %), digital activities (0.1 %), then water and waste (both, < 0.1 %).
Conclusion
General Practice generates a significant amount of CO2 and, therefore, requires specific actions to be implemented to reduce its impact on the environment.