无医源性污名的肺癌筛查有效沟通:使用LungTalk肺癌污名沟通评估工具的简短报告案例研究

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lisa Carter-Bawa PhD, MPH, APRN, ANP-C, FAAN , Jamie S. Ostroff PhD , Kaitlyn Hoover MS , Jamie L. Studts PhD
{"title":"无医源性污名的肺癌筛查有效沟通:使用LungTalk肺癌污名沟通评估工具的简短报告案例研究","authors":"Lisa Carter-Bawa PhD, MPH, APRN, ANP-C, FAAN ,&nbsp;Jamie S. Ostroff PhD ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Hoover MS ,&nbsp;Jamie L. Studts PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Stigma thwarts progress in lung cancer risk reduction and control and adversely affects patients across the entire lung cancer care continuum. In developing and disseminating patient and public-facing interventions to increase lung screening, we must be cognizant of how communications have the potential for further stigmatization of at-risk populations. Creation of the Lung Cancer Stigma Communications Assessment Tool (LCS-CAT) version 1 was supported by the American Cancer Society’s National Lung Cancer Roundtable to help content developers identify, remove, and replace potentially stigmatizing language and imagery from materials designed to engage individuals across the lung cancer continuum.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The LCS-CAT considers language, imagery, and context and was used to audit a public-facing health communication and decision support tool called <em>LungTalk</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The audit performed by two behavioral scientists revealed multiple issues in all three areas, and specific feedback and alternatives were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Applying the LCS-CAT to <em>LungTalk</em> was a productive process that helped remove potentially stigmatizing language and imagery from this tool designed to engage individuals in the process of making an informed decision about lung screening. To support destigmatization of lung cancer, communication creators should consider a stigma biopsy on all public-facing campaigns for lung screening to help identify, eliminate, and replace messages that could compromise engagement with the lung cancer screening opportunity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001285/pdfft?md5=9601ad4a3ef44513172920434b0b7355&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364323001285-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Communication About Lung Cancer Screening Without Iatrogenic Stigma: A Brief Report Case Study Using the Lung Cancer Stigma Communications Assessment Tool of LungTalk\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Carter-Bawa PhD, MPH, APRN, ANP-C, FAAN ,&nbsp;Jamie S. Ostroff PhD ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Hoover MS ,&nbsp;Jamie L. Studts PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Stigma thwarts progress in lung cancer risk reduction and control and adversely affects patients across the entire lung cancer care continuum. In developing and disseminating patient and public-facing interventions to increase lung screening, we must be cognizant of how communications have the potential for further stigmatization of at-risk populations. Creation of the Lung Cancer Stigma Communications Assessment Tool (LCS-CAT) version 1 was supported by the American Cancer Society’s National Lung Cancer Roundtable to help content developers identify, remove, and replace potentially stigmatizing language and imagery from materials designed to engage individuals across the lung cancer continuum.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The LCS-CAT considers language, imagery, and context and was used to audit a public-facing health communication and decision support tool called <em>LungTalk</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The audit performed by two behavioral scientists revealed multiple issues in all three areas, and specific feedback and alternatives were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Applying the LCS-CAT to <em>LungTalk</em> was a productive process that helped remove potentially stigmatizing language and imagery from this tool designed to engage individuals in the process of making an informed decision about lung screening. To support destigmatization of lung cancer, communication creators should consider a stigma biopsy on all public-facing campaigns for lung screening to help identify, eliminate, and replace messages that could compromise engagement with the lung cancer screening opportunity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001285/pdfft?md5=9601ad4a3ef44513172920434b0b7355&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364323001285-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耻辱感阻碍了肺癌风险降低和控制的进展,并对整个肺癌治疗连续体的患者产生不利影响。在制定和传播面向患者和公众的干预措施以增加肺部筛查时,我们必须认识到,传播有可能进一步使高危人群蒙受耻辱。肺癌污名传播评估工具(LCS-CAT)第一版的创建得到了美国癌症协会国家肺癌圆桌会议的支持,以帮助内容开发人员从旨在吸引肺癌连续体个体的材料中识别、删除和替换潜在的污名化语言和图像。方法LCS-CAT考虑语言、图像和上下文,并用于审计面向公众的卫生沟通和决策支持工具LungTalk。结果由两位行为科学家执行的审计发现了所有三个领域的多重问题,并确定了具体的反馈和替代方案。将LCS-CAT应用于lung talk是一个富有成效的过程,有助于消除该工具中潜在的污名化语言和图像,该工具旨在让个人参与到对肺部筛查做出知情决定的过程中。为了支持肺癌去污名化,传播创造者应该考虑在所有面向公众的肺部筛查活动中进行污名活检,以帮助识别、消除和替换可能影响肺癌筛查机会参与的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective Communication About Lung Cancer Screening Without Iatrogenic Stigma: A Brief Report Case Study Using the Lung Cancer Stigma Communications Assessment Tool of LungTalk

Introduction

Stigma thwarts progress in lung cancer risk reduction and control and adversely affects patients across the entire lung cancer care continuum. In developing and disseminating patient and public-facing interventions to increase lung screening, we must be cognizant of how communications have the potential for further stigmatization of at-risk populations. Creation of the Lung Cancer Stigma Communications Assessment Tool (LCS-CAT) version 1 was supported by the American Cancer Society’s National Lung Cancer Roundtable to help content developers identify, remove, and replace potentially stigmatizing language and imagery from materials designed to engage individuals across the lung cancer continuum.

Methods

The LCS-CAT considers language, imagery, and context and was used to audit a public-facing health communication and decision support tool called LungTalk.

Results

The audit performed by two behavioral scientists revealed multiple issues in all three areas, and specific feedback and alternatives were identified.

Conclusions

Applying the LCS-CAT to LungTalk was a productive process that helped remove potentially stigmatizing language and imagery from this tool designed to engage individuals in the process of making an informed decision about lung screening. To support destigmatization of lung cancer, communication creators should consider a stigma biopsy on all public-facing campaigns for lung screening to help identify, eliminate, and replace messages that could compromise engagement with the lung cancer screening opportunity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信