老年住院病人的持续谵妄:最新系统综述和荟萃分析。

Jonathan Whitby, Anita Nitchingham, Gideon Caplan, Daniel Davis, Alex Tsui
{"title":"老年住院病人的持续谵妄:最新系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jonathan Whitby, Anita Nitchingham, Gideon Caplan, Daniel Davis, Alex Tsui","doi":"10.56392/001c.36822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delirium is associated with future dementia progression. Yet whether this occurs subclinically over months and years, or persistent delirium merges into worsened dementia is not understood. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of persistent delirium and understand variation in its duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted an identical search strategy to a previous systematic review, only including studies using a recognised diagnostic framework for ascertaining delirium at follow-up (persistent delirium). Studies included hospitalised older patients outside critical and palliative care settings. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 11th January 2022. We applied risk of bias assessments based on Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders criteria and assessed strength of recommendations using the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. Estimates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis, and we estimated associations with follow-up duration using robust error meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 13 new cohorts, which we added to 10 from the previous systematic review (23 relevant studies, with 39 reports of persistent delirium at 7 time-points in 3186 individuals admitted to hospital care (mean age 82 years and 41% dementia prevalence). Studies were mainly at moderate risk of bias. Pooled delirium prevalence estimates at discharge were 36% (95% CI 22% to 51%, 13 studies). Robust error meta-regression did not show variation in prevalence of persistent delirium over time (-1.6% per month, 95% CI -4.8 to 1.6, p=0.08). Margins estimates for this model indicate a prevalence of persistent delirium of 16% (95% CI 6% to 25%) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review emphasises the importance of delirium as a persistent and extensive problem (GRADE certainty = moderate), raising questions on chronic delirium as a clinical entity and how it might evolve into dementia. Addressing persistent delirium will require a whole-system, integrated approach to detect, follow-up and implement opportunities for recovery across all healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72775,"journal":{"name":"Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)","volume":"1 ","pages":"36822"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Whitby, Anita Nitchingham, Gideon Caplan, Daniel Davis, Alex Tsui\",\"doi\":\"10.56392/001c.36822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delirium is associated with future dementia progression. Yet whether this occurs subclinically over months and years, or persistent delirium merges into worsened dementia is not understood. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of persistent delirium and understand variation in its duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted an identical search strategy to a previous systematic review, only including studies using a recognised diagnostic framework for ascertaining delirium at follow-up (persistent delirium). Studies included hospitalised older patients outside critical and palliative care settings. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 11th January 2022. We applied risk of bias assessments based on Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders criteria and assessed strength of recommendations using the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. Estimates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis, and we estimated associations with follow-up duration using robust error meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 13 new cohorts, which we added to 10 from the previous systematic review (23 relevant studies, with 39 reports of persistent delirium at 7 time-points in 3186 individuals admitted to hospital care (mean age 82 years and 41% dementia prevalence). Studies were mainly at moderate risk of bias. Pooled delirium prevalence estimates at discharge were 36% (95% CI 22% to 51%, 13 studies). Robust error meta-regression did not show variation in prevalence of persistent delirium over time (-1.6% per month, 95% CI -4.8 to 1.6, p=0.08). Margins estimates for this model indicate a prevalence of persistent delirium of 16% (95% CI 6% to 25%) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review emphasises the importance of delirium as a persistent and extensive problem (GRADE certainty = moderate), raising questions on chronic delirium as a clinical entity and how it might evolve into dementia. Addressing persistent delirium will require a whole-system, integrated approach to detect, follow-up and implement opportunities for recovery across all healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"36822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56392/001c.36822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56392/001c.36822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言谵妄与未来痴呆症的发展有关。然而,这种情况是在数月或数年的亚临床状态下发生,还是持续性谵妄与痴呆症恶化合二为一,目前尚不清楚。我们的目标是估算持续性谵妄的患病率并了解其持续时间的变化:我们采用了与之前的系统综述相同的检索策略,仅纳入了使用公认诊断框架确定随访谵妄(持续性谵妄)的研究。研究对象包括危重症和姑息治疗机构以外的住院老年患者。我们于 2022 年 1 月 11 日检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 系统综述数据库。我们根据《神经系统疾病报告标准》进行了偏倚风险评估,并采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)评估了建议力度。采用随机效应荟萃分析法对各项研究的结果进行汇总,并采用稳健误差荟萃回归法估算随访时间的相关性:我们发现了 13 项新的队列研究,与之前系统综述中的 10 项队列研究进行了补充(23 项相关研究,在 7 个时间点对 3186 名住院患者(平均年龄 82 岁,痴呆症患病率为 41%)的持续谵妄进行了 39 项报告)。研究主要存在中度偏倚风险。出院时谵妄患病率的汇总估计值为 36%(95% CI 22% 至 51%,13 项研究)。稳健误差元回归并未显示持续谵妄患病率随时间的变化(每月-1.6%,95% CI -4.8至1.6,P=0.08)。该模型的边际估计值显示,12个月后持续谵妄的发生率为16%(95% CI为6%至25%):本系统综述强调了谵妄作为一种持续性和广泛性问题的重要性(GRADE确定性=中度),提出了慢性谵妄作为一种临床实体及其如何演变为痴呆的问题。要解决持续性谵妄问题,就需要在所有医疗机构中采用全系统的综合方法来检测、跟踪和实施康复机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Delirium is associated with future dementia progression. Yet whether this occurs subclinically over months and years, or persistent delirium merges into worsened dementia is not understood. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of persistent delirium and understand variation in its duration.

Methods: We adopted an identical search strategy to a previous systematic review, only including studies using a recognised diagnostic framework for ascertaining delirium at follow-up (persistent delirium). Studies included hospitalised older patients outside critical and palliative care settings. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 11th January 2022. We applied risk of bias assessments based on Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders criteria and assessed strength of recommendations using the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. Estimates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis, and we estimated associations with follow-up duration using robust error meta-regression.

Results: We identified 13 new cohorts, which we added to 10 from the previous systematic review (23 relevant studies, with 39 reports of persistent delirium at 7 time-points in 3186 individuals admitted to hospital care (mean age 82 years and 41% dementia prevalence). Studies were mainly at moderate risk of bias. Pooled delirium prevalence estimates at discharge were 36% (95% CI 22% to 51%, 13 studies). Robust error meta-regression did not show variation in prevalence of persistent delirium over time (-1.6% per month, 95% CI -4.8 to 1.6, p=0.08). Margins estimates for this model indicate a prevalence of persistent delirium of 16% (95% CI 6% to 25%) at 12 months.

Conclusions: This systematic review emphasises the importance of delirium as a persistent and extensive problem (GRADE certainty = moderate), raising questions on chronic delirium as a clinical entity and how it might evolve into dementia. Addressing persistent delirium will require a whole-system, integrated approach to detect, follow-up and implement opportunities for recovery across all healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信