教育中的聊天技术:方法、潜力和局限性

Bahar Memarian, Tenzin Doleck
{"title":"教育中的聊天技术:方法、潜力和局限性","authors":"Bahar Memarian,&nbsp;Tenzin Doleck","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>ChatGPT has been under the scrutiny of public opinion including in education. Yet, less work has been done to analyze studies conducted on ChatGPT in educational contexts. This review paper examines where ChatGPT is employed in educational literature and areas of potential, challenges, and future work. A total of 63 publications were included in this review using the general framework of open and axial coding. We coded and summarized the methods, and reported potentials, limitations, and future work of each study. Thematic analysis of reviewed studies revealed that most extant studies in the education literature explore ChatGPT through a commentary and non-empirical lens. The potentials of ChatGPT include but are not limited to the development of personalized and complex learning, specific teaching and learning activities, assessments, asynchronous communication, feedback, accuracy in research, personas, and task delegation and cognitive offload. Several areas of challenge that ChatGPT is or will be facing in education are also shared. Examples include but are not limited to plagiarism deception, misuse or lack of learning, accountability, and privacy. There are both concerns and optimism about the use of ChatGPT in education, yet the most pressing need is to ensure student learning and academic integrity are not sacrificed. Our review provides a summary of studies conducted on ChatGPT in education literature. We further provide a comprehensive and unique discussion on future considerations for ChatGPT in education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000221/pdfft?md5=f9aa184eb8668e5dbec672d9482aabfb&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882123000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations\",\"authors\":\"Bahar Memarian,&nbsp;Tenzin Doleck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>ChatGPT has been under the scrutiny of public opinion including in education. Yet, less work has been done to analyze studies conducted on ChatGPT in educational contexts. This review paper examines where ChatGPT is employed in educational literature and areas of potential, challenges, and future work. A total of 63 publications were included in this review using the general framework of open and axial coding. We coded and summarized the methods, and reported potentials, limitations, and future work of each study. Thematic analysis of reviewed studies revealed that most extant studies in the education literature explore ChatGPT through a commentary and non-empirical lens. The potentials of ChatGPT include but are not limited to the development of personalized and complex learning, specific teaching and learning activities, assessments, asynchronous communication, feedback, accuracy in research, personas, and task delegation and cognitive offload. Several areas of challenge that ChatGPT is or will be facing in education are also shared. Examples include but are not limited to plagiarism deception, misuse or lack of learning, accountability, and privacy. There are both concerns and optimism about the use of ChatGPT in education, yet the most pressing need is to ensure student learning and academic integrity are not sacrificed. Our review provides a summary of studies conducted on ChatGPT in education literature. We further provide a comprehensive and unique discussion on future considerations for ChatGPT in education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000221/pdfft?md5=f9aa184eb8668e5dbec672d9482aabfb&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882123000221-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

ChatGPT一直受到包括教育界在内的公众舆论的密切关注。然而,对ChatGPT在教育背景下进行的研究进行分析的工作却很少。这篇综述研究了ChatGPT在教育文献中的应用,以及它的潜力、挑战和未来的工作。本综述采用开放编码和轴向编码的一般框架,共纳入63篇出版物。我们对这些方法进行了编码和总结,并报道了每项研究的潜力、局限性和未来的工作。对所回顾研究的专题分析表明,大多数现存的教育文献研究都是通过评论和非经验的视角来探索ChatGPT的。ChatGPT的潜力包括但不限于个性化和复杂学习的发展、具体的教学和学习活动、评估、异步通信、反馈、研究准确性、人物角色、任务授权和认知卸载。ChatGPT在教育中面临或将面临的几个挑战领域也被分享。例子包括但不限于抄袭、欺骗、滥用或缺乏学习、问责制和隐私。在教育中使用ChatGPT既有担忧,也有乐观,但最迫切的需要是确保学生的学习和学术诚信不被牺牲。本文综述了教育文献中关于ChatGPT的研究。我们进一步对ChatGPT在教育中的未来考虑进行了全面而独特的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations

ChatGPT has been under the scrutiny of public opinion including in education. Yet, less work has been done to analyze studies conducted on ChatGPT in educational contexts. This review paper examines where ChatGPT is employed in educational literature and areas of potential, challenges, and future work. A total of 63 publications were included in this review using the general framework of open and axial coding. We coded and summarized the methods, and reported potentials, limitations, and future work of each study. Thematic analysis of reviewed studies revealed that most extant studies in the education literature explore ChatGPT through a commentary and non-empirical lens. The potentials of ChatGPT include but are not limited to the development of personalized and complex learning, specific teaching and learning activities, assessments, asynchronous communication, feedback, accuracy in research, personas, and task delegation and cognitive offload. Several areas of challenge that ChatGPT is or will be facing in education are also shared. Examples include but are not limited to plagiarism deception, misuse or lack of learning, accountability, and privacy. There are both concerns and optimism about the use of ChatGPT in education, yet the most pressing need is to ensure student learning and academic integrity are not sacrificed. Our review provides a summary of studies conducted on ChatGPT in education literature. We further provide a comprehensive and unique discussion on future considerations for ChatGPT in education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信