编辑概述:价值观与决策:发展轨迹如何转变

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Meine van Noordwijk , Grace B Villamor , Gert Jan Hofstede , Erika N Speelman
{"title":"编辑概述:价值观与决策:发展轨迹如何转变","authors":"Meine van Noordwijk ,&nbsp;Grace B Villamor ,&nbsp;Gert Jan Hofstede ,&nbsp;Erika N Speelman","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multiple ways of communicating values of nature interact with human decisions in natural resource management. The relative emphasis on relational and instrumental values of nature changes with variation in any of the nested social scales: individual motivation, rationality, morality, sociality, culture, and worldviews. This collection of papers reviews how values and decisions interact in the forest–water–people nexus, suggesting conclusions for current policy discourse on transforming development trajectories. Rationality (taking steps to meet goals) and relationality (taking steps to maintain relations) differ in their reference to explicit (short-term) and implicit (long-term) goals. Relational rationality, and the relational value concept it infers, complements instrumental rationality and goal-oriented, instrumental values. Three progressive tipping points in how, historically, human and social systems relate to nature are 1) technological control over nature, 2) nature strikes back, driving environmental institutions and policies controlling technology, and 3) relational values of nature complementing instrumental ones in policy design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101365"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial overview: Values and decisions: How can development trajectories transform\",\"authors\":\"Meine van Noordwijk ,&nbsp;Grace B Villamor ,&nbsp;Gert Jan Hofstede ,&nbsp;Erika N Speelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Multiple ways of communicating values of nature interact with human decisions in natural resource management. The relative emphasis on relational and instrumental values of nature changes with variation in any of the nested social scales: individual motivation, rationality, morality, sociality, culture, and worldviews. This collection of papers reviews how values and decisions interact in the forest–water–people nexus, suggesting conclusions for current policy discourse on transforming development trajectories. Rationality (taking steps to meet goals) and relationality (taking steps to maintain relations) differ in their reference to explicit (short-term) and implicit (long-term) goals. Relational rationality, and the relational value concept it infers, complements instrumental rationality and goal-oriented, instrumental values. Three progressive tipping points in how, historically, human and social systems relate to nature are 1) technological control over nature, 2) nature strikes back, driving environmental institutions and policies controlling technology, and 3) relational values of nature complementing instrumental ones in policy design.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在自然资源管理中,多种沟通自然价值的方式与人类决策相互作用。对自然的关系价值和工具价值的相对强调随着任何嵌套的社会尺度的变化而变化:个人动机、理性、道德、社会性、文化和世界观。本论文集回顾了价值和决策在森林-水-人关系中的相互作用,为当前关于转变发展轨迹的政策论述提出了结论。理性(采取措施实现目标)和关系(采取措施维持关系)在对明确(短期)和隐含(长期)目标的参考上有所不同。关系理性及其推导出的关系价值观是对工具理性和目标导向的工具价值的补充。从历史上看,人类和社会系统与自然的关系有三个渐进的临界点:1)技术对自然的控制,2)自然的反击,推动环境机构和政策控制技术,以及3)自然的关系价值与政策设计中的工具价值相辅相成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Editorial overview: Values and decisions: How can development trajectories transform

Editorial overview: Values and decisions: How can development trajectories transform

Multiple ways of communicating values of nature interact with human decisions in natural resource management. The relative emphasis on relational and instrumental values of nature changes with variation in any of the nested social scales: individual motivation, rationality, morality, sociality, culture, and worldviews. This collection of papers reviews how values and decisions interact in the forest–water–people nexus, suggesting conclusions for current policy discourse on transforming development trajectories. Rationality (taking steps to meet goals) and relationality (taking steps to maintain relations) differ in their reference to explicit (short-term) and implicit (long-term) goals. Relational rationality, and the relational value concept it infers, complements instrumental rationality and goal-oriented, instrumental values. Three progressive tipping points in how, historically, human and social systems relate to nature are 1) technological control over nature, 2) nature strikes back, driving environmental institutions and policies controlling technology, and 3) relational values of nature complementing instrumental ones in policy design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信