在全球南方实施气候适应型发展路径

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anna Taylor , Nadine Methner , Kalia R Barkai , Alice McClure , Christopher Jack , Mark New , Gina Ziervogel
{"title":"在全球南方实施气候适应型发展路径","authors":"Anna Taylor ,&nbsp;Nadine Methner ,&nbsp;Kalia R Barkai ,&nbsp;Alice McClure ,&nbsp;Christopher Jack ,&nbsp;Mark New ,&nbsp;Gina Ziervogel","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>National and sub-national actors are grappling with how to urgently move from climate change commitments to widespread actions that drastically reduce the risks posed by a changing climate and greenhouse gas emissions driving this change in tandem with addressing socio-economic inequalities. A pivotal challenge is how to cohere and sequence interventions in light of competing priorities, changing risk profiles and deep structural inequalities. Ideas of characterising and transitioning to climate-resilient development (CRD) pathways, and away from the historically carbon-intensive, climate-vulnerable and highly inequitable development pathways, are gaining traction in science and policy domains. But how do these ideas get operationalised in practice? Especially in contexts where many people’s basic needs remain unmet, much of what happens is unplanned and unregulated, and access to public decision-making processes is limited. This paper reviews published applications of adaptation and CRD pathways approaches, focussing on those undertaken in Global South contexts. The review reflects on how issues of (in)equity are foregrounded and addressed when working with marginalised and powerful groups to identify risk thresholds, assess and prioritise options and confront unsettling trade-offs and lock-ins. Particular attention is given firstly to how scientific climate information pertaining to various time- and spatial scales is woven together with lived experiences and traditional forms of knowledge. Secondly, the institutional capacities that are needed to transition from maladaptive to more CRD pathways are considered. Building networks of intermediaries to work across social groups, sectors, disciplines and scales, fostering trust and creating opportunities for transformative action, emerges as key to realising equitable CRD pathways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101328"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000751/pdfft?md5=b61c8c091af6efe636ed08cc4fa99673&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523000751-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operationalising climate-resilient development pathways in the Global South\",\"authors\":\"Anna Taylor ,&nbsp;Nadine Methner ,&nbsp;Kalia R Barkai ,&nbsp;Alice McClure ,&nbsp;Christopher Jack ,&nbsp;Mark New ,&nbsp;Gina Ziervogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>National and sub-national actors are grappling with how to urgently move from climate change commitments to widespread actions that drastically reduce the risks posed by a changing climate and greenhouse gas emissions driving this change in tandem with addressing socio-economic inequalities. A pivotal challenge is how to cohere and sequence interventions in light of competing priorities, changing risk profiles and deep structural inequalities. Ideas of characterising and transitioning to climate-resilient development (CRD) pathways, and away from the historically carbon-intensive, climate-vulnerable and highly inequitable development pathways, are gaining traction in science and policy domains. But how do these ideas get operationalised in practice? Especially in contexts where many people’s basic needs remain unmet, much of what happens is unplanned and unregulated, and access to public decision-making processes is limited. This paper reviews published applications of adaptation and CRD pathways approaches, focussing on those undertaken in Global South contexts. The review reflects on how issues of (in)equity are foregrounded and addressed when working with marginalised and powerful groups to identify risk thresholds, assess and prioritise options and confront unsettling trade-offs and lock-ins. Particular attention is given firstly to how scientific climate information pertaining to various time- and spatial scales is woven together with lived experiences and traditional forms of knowledge. Secondly, the institutional capacities that are needed to transition from maladaptive to more CRD pathways are considered. Building networks of intermediaries to work across social groups, sectors, disciplines and scales, fostering trust and creating opportunities for transformative action, emerges as key to realising equitable CRD pathways.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000751/pdfft?md5=b61c8c091af6efe636ed08cc4fa99673&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523000751-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000751\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国家和次国家行为体正在努力解决如何从气候变化承诺紧急转向广泛行动,大幅减少气候变化和温室气体排放带来的风险,同时解决社会经济不平等问题。一个关键的挑战是如何根据相互竞争的优先事项、不断变化的风险概况和深刻的结构性不平等来协调和安排干预措施。在科学和政策领域,确定气候适应型发展路径的特征并向其过渡,以及摆脱历史上碳密集型、气候脆弱和高度不公平的发展路径的想法正在获得支持。但这些想法如何在实践中付诸实施呢?特别是在许多人的基本需求仍未得到满足的情况下,发生的许多事情都是计划外和不受管制的,参与公共决策过程的机会有限。本文回顾了已发表的适应和CRD途径方法的应用,重点介绍了在全球南方背景下开展的应用。该审查反映了在与边缘化和强大群体合作以确定风险阈值、评估和优先考虑备选方案以及面对令人不安的权衡和锁定时,如何重视和解决(不)公平问题。特别注意的是,首先是关于不同时间和空间尺度的科学气候信息如何与生活经验和传统知识形式交织在一起。其次,考虑了从适应不良过渡到更多的CRD途径所需的机构能力。建立跨社会群体、部门、学科和规模开展工作的中介网络,促进信任并为变革行动创造机会,成为实现公平的社区发展途径的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operationalising climate-resilient development pathways in the Global South

National and sub-national actors are grappling with how to urgently move from climate change commitments to widespread actions that drastically reduce the risks posed by a changing climate and greenhouse gas emissions driving this change in tandem with addressing socio-economic inequalities. A pivotal challenge is how to cohere and sequence interventions in light of competing priorities, changing risk profiles and deep structural inequalities. Ideas of characterising and transitioning to climate-resilient development (CRD) pathways, and away from the historically carbon-intensive, climate-vulnerable and highly inequitable development pathways, are gaining traction in science and policy domains. But how do these ideas get operationalised in practice? Especially in contexts where many people’s basic needs remain unmet, much of what happens is unplanned and unregulated, and access to public decision-making processes is limited. This paper reviews published applications of adaptation and CRD pathways approaches, focussing on those undertaken in Global South contexts. The review reflects on how issues of (in)equity are foregrounded and addressed when working with marginalised and powerful groups to identify risk thresholds, assess and prioritise options and confront unsettling trade-offs and lock-ins. Particular attention is given firstly to how scientific climate information pertaining to various time- and spatial scales is woven together with lived experiences and traditional forms of knowledge. Secondly, the institutional capacities that are needed to transition from maladaptive to more CRD pathways are considered. Building networks of intermediaries to work across social groups, sectors, disciplines and scales, fostering trust and creating opportunities for transformative action, emerges as key to realising equitable CRD pathways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信