呼吁建立科学与工程标杆

Jianfeng Zhan
{"title":"呼吁建立科学与工程标杆","authors":"Jianfeng Zhan","doi":"10.1016/j.tbench.2021.100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, there is no consistent benchmarking across multi-disciplines. Even no previous work tries to relate different categories of benchmarks in multi-disciplines. This article investigates the origin and evolution of the benchmark term. Five categories of benchmarks are summarized, including measurement standards, standardized data sets with defined properties, representative workloads, representative data sets, and best practices, which widely exist in multi-disciplines. I believe there are two pressing challenges in growing this discipline: establishing consistent benchmarking across multi-disciplines and developing meta-benchmark to measure the benchmarks themselves. I propose establishing benchmark science and engineering; one of the primary goals is to set up a standard benchmark hierarchy across multi-disciplines. It is the right time to launch a multi-disciplinary benchmark, standard, and evaluation journal, TBench, to communicate the state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice of benchmark science and engineering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100155,"journal":{"name":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772485921000120/pdfft?md5=a1ed86c4fa15d92ea898e2111c96d7b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2772485921000120-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Call for establishing benchmark science and engineering\",\"authors\":\"Jianfeng Zhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbench.2021.100012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Currently, there is no consistent benchmarking across multi-disciplines. Even no previous work tries to relate different categories of benchmarks in multi-disciplines. This article investigates the origin and evolution of the benchmark term. Five categories of benchmarks are summarized, including measurement standards, standardized data sets with defined properties, representative workloads, representative data sets, and best practices, which widely exist in multi-disciplines. I believe there are two pressing challenges in growing this discipline: establishing consistent benchmarking across multi-disciplines and developing meta-benchmark to measure the benchmarks themselves. I propose establishing benchmark science and engineering; one of the primary goals is to set up a standard benchmark hierarchy across multi-disciplines. It is the right time to launch a multi-disciplinary benchmark, standard, and evaluation journal, TBench, to communicate the state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice of benchmark science and engineering.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772485921000120/pdfft?md5=a1ed86c4fa15d92ea898e2111c96d7b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2772485921000120-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772485921000120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772485921000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目前,没有跨多学科的一致基准。甚至没有以前的工作试图将不同类别的基准在多学科中联系起来。本文研究基准术语的起源和演变。本文总结了五类基准,包括度量标准、具有定义属性的标准化数据集、代表性工作负载、代表性数据集和最佳实践,它们广泛存在于多学科中。我认为发展这一学科有两个紧迫的挑战:在多学科之间建立一致的基准和开发元基准来衡量基准本身。我建议建立科学和工程的标杆;主要目标之一是建立跨多学科的标准基准层次结构。现在是时候推出一个多学科的基准、标准和评估期刊TBench,以交流基准科学和工程的最先进和最先进的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Call for establishing benchmark science and engineering

Currently, there is no consistent benchmarking across multi-disciplines. Even no previous work tries to relate different categories of benchmarks in multi-disciplines. This article investigates the origin and evolution of the benchmark term. Five categories of benchmarks are summarized, including measurement standards, standardized data sets with defined properties, representative workloads, representative data sets, and best practices, which widely exist in multi-disciplines. I believe there are two pressing challenges in growing this discipline: establishing consistent benchmarking across multi-disciplines and developing meta-benchmark to measure the benchmarks themselves. I propose establishing benchmark science and engineering; one of the primary goals is to set up a standard benchmark hierarchy across multi-disciplines. It is the right time to launch a multi-disciplinary benchmark, standard, and evaluation journal, TBench, to communicate the state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice of benchmark science and engineering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信