标准与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:一项前瞻性随机研究

Gabriel Tender * , Daniel Serban , Anthony DiGiorgio
{"title":"标准与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:一项前瞻性随机研究","authors":"Gabriel Tender * ,&nbsp;Daniel Serban ,&nbsp;Anthony DiGiorgio","doi":"10.1016/j.nhccr.2017.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Symptomatic spondylolisthesis patients may benefit from surgical decompression and stabilization. The standard (S) technique is a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Newer, minimally invasive (MI) techniques seem to provide similar results with less morbidity. However, prospective studies comparing S versus MI TLIF are rare.</p></div><div><h3>Case description</h3><p>Patients with at least 6 months of symptoms and image-confirmed low-grade spondylolisthesis (grade 1 or 2) were enrolled, at a single academic institution, between 2011 and 2015. The patients were randomized to either S or MI TLIF. Iliac crest graft, polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody cages, and pedicle screw-rod constructs were used in both groups. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement at 1 year. Secondary outcome measures included length of operation, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, and fusion rates at 1 year. Complications were also recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusions</h3><p>Forty patients were enrolled in each group. There was no crossover between groups. The age was 50.12+/-11.09 years in the S TLIF group and 51.3+/-9.36 years in the MI TLIF group. There were 23 and 24 females in the S and MI TLIF group, respectively. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss in the S versus MI TLIF group were 297+/-101 versus 323 +/-85 minutes and 417+/-211 versus 351+/-198 ml, respectively. There were 4 transfusions in the S TLIF and 3 transfusions in the MI TLIF group. The patients were discharged after surgery at 4.12+/-0.88 days for the S TLIF group and 1.92+/-0.52 days for the MI TLIF group. The ODI improved from 37+/-6 to 11+/-6 in the S TLIF group (ODI difference: 26+/-7) and from 38+/-7 to 11+/-6 in the MI TLIF group (ODI difference: 26+/-8). The fusion was considered solid (Grade I) in 36 (90%) and partial (Grade II) in 4 (10%) patients at 1 year. There were no reoperations for pseudarthrosis or any other postoperative complication. There were 2 superficial wound infections in the standard TLIF group, which resolved with oral antibiotic treatment alone.</p></div><div><h3>Take home message</h3><p>In this prospective randomized study, the standard and minimally invasive TLIF in patients with symptomatic spondylolisthesis provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes at 1 year. The patients undergoing MI TLIF had a shorter hospital stay. Both surgical techniques yielded good results at 1 year.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100954,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Clinical Case Reports","volume":"2 ","pages":"Page 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nhccr.2017.10.018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standard versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A prospective randomized study\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Tender * ,&nbsp;Daniel Serban ,&nbsp;Anthony DiGiorgio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nhccr.2017.10.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Symptomatic spondylolisthesis patients may benefit from surgical decompression and stabilization. The standard (S) technique is a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Newer, minimally invasive (MI) techniques seem to provide similar results with less morbidity. However, prospective studies comparing S versus MI TLIF are rare.</p></div><div><h3>Case description</h3><p>Patients with at least 6 months of symptoms and image-confirmed low-grade spondylolisthesis (grade 1 or 2) were enrolled, at a single academic institution, between 2011 and 2015. The patients were randomized to either S or MI TLIF. Iliac crest graft, polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody cages, and pedicle screw-rod constructs were used in both groups. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement at 1 year. Secondary outcome measures included length of operation, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, and fusion rates at 1 year. Complications were also recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusions</h3><p>Forty patients were enrolled in each group. There was no crossover between groups. The age was 50.12+/-11.09 years in the S TLIF group and 51.3+/-9.36 years in the MI TLIF group. There were 23 and 24 females in the S and MI TLIF group, respectively. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss in the S versus MI TLIF group were 297+/-101 versus 323 +/-85 minutes and 417+/-211 versus 351+/-198 ml, respectively. There were 4 transfusions in the S TLIF and 3 transfusions in the MI TLIF group. The patients were discharged after surgery at 4.12+/-0.88 days for the S TLIF group and 1.92+/-0.52 days for the MI TLIF group. The ODI improved from 37+/-6 to 11+/-6 in the S TLIF group (ODI difference: 26+/-7) and from 38+/-7 to 11+/-6 in the MI TLIF group (ODI difference: 26+/-8). The fusion was considered solid (Grade I) in 36 (90%) and partial (Grade II) in 4 (10%) patients at 1 year. There were no reoperations for pseudarthrosis or any other postoperative complication. There were 2 superficial wound infections in the standard TLIF group, which resolved with oral antibiotic treatment alone.</p></div><div><h3>Take home message</h3><p>In this prospective randomized study, the standard and minimally invasive TLIF in patients with symptomatic spondylolisthesis provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes at 1 year. The patients undergoing MI TLIF had a shorter hospital stay. Both surgical techniques yielded good results at 1 year.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Horizons in Clinical Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Page 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nhccr.2017.10.018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Horizons in Clinical Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352948217302349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Horizons in Clinical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352948217302349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有症状的腰椎滑脱患者可以从手术减压和稳定中获益。标准(S)技术是经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)。较新的微创(MI)技术似乎可以提供类似的结果,而且发病率更低。然而,比较S和MI TLIF的前瞻性研究很少。病例描述:2011年至2015年间,在一个学术机构招募了症状持续至少6个月且影像学证实为轻度脊柱滑脱(1级或2级)的患者。患者被随机分为S或MI TLIF组。两组均采用髂骨移植物、聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间笼和椎弓根螺钉棒结构。主要结局指标为1年的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)改善。次要结局指标包括手术时间、估计失血量、住院时间和1年的融合率。并发症也有记录。结果与结论每组40例。两组之间没有交叉。S TLIF组年龄为50.12+/-11.09岁,MI TLIF组年龄为51.3+/-9.36岁。S组和MI组分别有23例和24例女性。S和MI TLIF组的平均手术时间和估计失血量分别为297+/-101和323 +/-85分钟,417+/-211和351+/-198 ml。S TLIF组输注4次,MI TLIF组输注3次。S TLIF组术后4.12+/-0.88天出院,MI TLIF组术后1.92+/-0.52天出院。S TLIF组的ODI从37+/-6改善到11+/-6 (ODI差值:26+/-7),MI TLIF组的ODI从38+/-7改善到11+/-6 (ODI差值:26+/-8)。1年后,36例(90%)患者被认为是固体(I级)融合,4例(10%)患者被认为是部分(II级)融合。无假关节再手术或任何其他术后并发症。标准TLIF组有2例浅表创面感染,均经单独口服抗生素治疗解决。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,标准和微创TLIF治疗有症状的脊柱滑脱患者1年后的临床和影像学结果相似。接受MI TLIF的患者住院时间较短。两种手术方法在1年后都取得了良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standard versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A prospective randomized study

Introduction

Symptomatic spondylolisthesis patients may benefit from surgical decompression and stabilization. The standard (S) technique is a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Newer, minimally invasive (MI) techniques seem to provide similar results with less morbidity. However, prospective studies comparing S versus MI TLIF are rare.

Case description

Patients with at least 6 months of symptoms and image-confirmed low-grade spondylolisthesis (grade 1 or 2) were enrolled, at a single academic institution, between 2011 and 2015. The patients were randomized to either S or MI TLIF. Iliac crest graft, polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody cages, and pedicle screw-rod constructs were used in both groups. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement at 1 year. Secondary outcome measures included length of operation, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, and fusion rates at 1 year. Complications were also recorded.

Results and Conclusions

Forty patients were enrolled in each group. There was no crossover between groups. The age was 50.12+/-11.09 years in the S TLIF group and 51.3+/-9.36 years in the MI TLIF group. There were 23 and 24 females in the S and MI TLIF group, respectively. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss in the S versus MI TLIF group were 297+/-101 versus 323 +/-85 minutes and 417+/-211 versus 351+/-198 ml, respectively. There were 4 transfusions in the S TLIF and 3 transfusions in the MI TLIF group. The patients were discharged after surgery at 4.12+/-0.88 days for the S TLIF group and 1.92+/-0.52 days for the MI TLIF group. The ODI improved from 37+/-6 to 11+/-6 in the S TLIF group (ODI difference: 26+/-7) and from 38+/-7 to 11+/-6 in the MI TLIF group (ODI difference: 26+/-8). The fusion was considered solid (Grade I) in 36 (90%) and partial (Grade II) in 4 (10%) patients at 1 year. There were no reoperations for pseudarthrosis or any other postoperative complication. There were 2 superficial wound infections in the standard TLIF group, which resolved with oral antibiotic treatment alone.

Take home message

In this prospective randomized study, the standard and minimally invasive TLIF in patients with symptomatic spondylolisthesis provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes at 1 year. The patients undergoing MI TLIF had a shorter hospital stay. Both surgical techniques yielded good results at 1 year.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信