南非约翰内斯堡学术医院急诊医生对无创通气的使用——评估知识、态度和做法

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Dr Holly Bird, Dr Craig Beringer, Dr Pano Parris
{"title":"南非约翰内斯堡学术医院急诊医生对无创通气的使用——评估知识、态度和做法","authors":"Dr Holly Bird,&nbsp;Dr Craig Beringer,&nbsp;Dr Pano Parris","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an alternative ventilatory method to endotracheal intubation and invasive ventilation in patients presenting in acute respiratory failure. Appropriate and timely application of NIV has shown benefits over invasive ventilation. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of NIV for varying pathologies in response to limited resources.</p><p>Emergency department doctors’ knowledge of NIV, as well as their attitude towards its use can have significant effects on the success of NIV. The aim of this study was to assess emergency doctors’ use of NIV in the South African setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a multi-centre prospective cross-sectional study that was conducted across three academic emergency departments in Johannesburg, South Africa. Doctors of various grades were included in the study and their responses were analysed according to their level of experience and their job description.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean knowledge score of the participants was shown to increase with an increase in job designation (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The doctors’ attitude towards NIV was more positive in those with higher knowledge scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Participants with previous critical care experience versus those without was associated with a higher average knowledge score (77% vs. 69 %, <em>p</em> = 0.009) as was formal NIV training versus those without (77% vs. 69 %, <em>p</em> = 0.01). The COVID-19 pandemic increased confidence in the use of NIV in 61 % of participants. The majority (69 %) of participants did not use a checklist when administering NIV. Only 53 % used a guideline when initiating a patient on NIV and just 26 % used a locally produced protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Increased clinical experience, critical care exposure and formal NIV training corresponded with higher knowledge scores. Formal NIV training programs, the implementation of a checklist and the development of locally produced protocols are recommended to improve knowledge, attitudes and NIV practice that is in-keeping with international standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000587/pdfft?md5=512158b034657a1a122c7ba45493de27&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X23000587-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of non-invasive ventilation by emergency doctors in Johannesburg Academic Hospitals, South Africa – assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices\",\"authors\":\"Dr Holly Bird,&nbsp;Dr Craig Beringer,&nbsp;Dr Pano Parris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.afjem.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an alternative ventilatory method to endotracheal intubation and invasive ventilation in patients presenting in acute respiratory failure. Appropriate and timely application of NIV has shown benefits over invasive ventilation. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of NIV for varying pathologies in response to limited resources.</p><p>Emergency department doctors’ knowledge of NIV, as well as their attitude towards its use can have significant effects on the success of NIV. The aim of this study was to assess emergency doctors’ use of NIV in the South African setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a multi-centre prospective cross-sectional study that was conducted across three academic emergency departments in Johannesburg, South Africa. Doctors of various grades were included in the study and their responses were analysed according to their level of experience and their job description.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean knowledge score of the participants was shown to increase with an increase in job designation (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The doctors’ attitude towards NIV was more positive in those with higher knowledge scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Participants with previous critical care experience versus those without was associated with a higher average knowledge score (77% vs. 69 %, <em>p</em> = 0.009) as was formal NIV training versus those without (77% vs. 69 %, <em>p</em> = 0.01). The COVID-19 pandemic increased confidence in the use of NIV in 61 % of participants. The majority (69 %) of participants did not use a checklist when administering NIV. Only 53 % used a guideline when initiating a patient on NIV and just 26 % used a locally produced protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Increased clinical experience, critical care exposure and formal NIV training corresponded with higher knowledge scores. Formal NIV training programs, the implementation of a checklist and the development of locally produced protocols are recommended to improve knowledge, attitudes and NIV practice that is in-keeping with international standards.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000587/pdfft?md5=512158b034657a1a122c7ba45493de27&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X23000587-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000587\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无创通气(NIV)是急性呼吸衰竭患者气管插管和有创通气的一种替代通气方法。适当和及时地应用无创通气比有创通气有好处。近年来,由于资源有限,对不同病理使用NIV的情况有所增加。急诊科医生对无创通气的了解程度以及对无创通气的使用态度对无创通气的成功与否有重要影响。本研究的目的是评估急诊医生在南非使用NIV的情况。方法:这是一项多中心前瞻性横断面研究,在南非约翰内斯堡的三个学术急诊科进行。研究中包括了不同级别的医生,并根据他们的经验水平和工作描述分析了他们的回答。结果:被试的平均知识得分随工作职位的增加而增加(p <0.001)。知识得分越高,医生对NIV的态度越积极(p <0.001)。有危重护理经验的参与者比没有危重护理经验的参与者平均知识得分更高(77%对69%,p = 0.009),正式NIV培训的参与者比没有正式NIV培训的参与者(77%对69%,p = 0.01)。COVID-19大流行增加了61%的参与者对使用NIV的信心。大多数(69%)的参与者在使用NIV时没有使用检查表。只有53%的患者在开始使用NIV时使用指南,只有26%的患者使用当地生产的方案。结论临床经验的增加、危重护理经验的增加和正规NIV培训的增加与知识得分的提高相对应。建议采用正式的NIV训练计划、执行检查表及发展当地制作的协议,以改善知识、态度及与国际标准保持一致的NIV实务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of non-invasive ventilation by emergency doctors in Johannesburg Academic Hospitals, South Africa – assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices

Introduction

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an alternative ventilatory method to endotracheal intubation and invasive ventilation in patients presenting in acute respiratory failure. Appropriate and timely application of NIV has shown benefits over invasive ventilation. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of NIV for varying pathologies in response to limited resources.

Emergency department doctors’ knowledge of NIV, as well as their attitude towards its use can have significant effects on the success of NIV. The aim of this study was to assess emergency doctors’ use of NIV in the South African setting.

Methods

This was a multi-centre prospective cross-sectional study that was conducted across three academic emergency departments in Johannesburg, South Africa. Doctors of various grades were included in the study and their responses were analysed according to their level of experience and their job description.

Results

The mean knowledge score of the participants was shown to increase with an increase in job designation (p < 0.001). The doctors’ attitude towards NIV was more positive in those with higher knowledge scores (p < 0.001). Participants with previous critical care experience versus those without was associated with a higher average knowledge score (77% vs. 69 %, p = 0.009) as was formal NIV training versus those without (77% vs. 69 %, p = 0.01). The COVID-19 pandemic increased confidence in the use of NIV in 61 % of participants. The majority (69 %) of participants did not use a checklist when administering NIV. Only 53 % used a guideline when initiating a patient on NIV and just 26 % used a locally produced protocol.

Conclusion

Increased clinical experience, critical care exposure and formal NIV training corresponded with higher knowledge scores. Formal NIV training programs, the implementation of a checklist and the development of locally produced protocols are recommended to improve knowledge, attitudes and NIV practice that is in-keeping with international standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信