门诊混合近距离治疗宫颈癌最小镇静的可行性:来自单一机构方案的结果。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Subhakar Mutyala, Gabriella Smith, Hayden Ansinelli, Nitika Thawani
{"title":"门诊混合近距离治疗宫颈癌最小镇静的可行性:来自单一机构方案的结果。","authors":"Subhakar Mutyala,&nbsp;Gabriella Smith,&nbsp;Hayden Ansinelli,&nbsp;Nitika Thawani","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2023.125527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain control techniques during high-dose-rate hybrid intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for cervical cancer vary widely, with many centers opting for general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS). Here, we describe a single-institutional series of patients treated with HBT and ASA-defined minimal sedation, utilizing oral analgesic and anxiolytic medications in substitution for GA or CS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The charts of patients who underwent HBT treatments for cervical cancer from June 2018 to May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Prior to HBT, all patients underwent an exam under anesthesia (EUA), and Smit sleeve placement under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Oral lorazepam and oxycodone/acetaminophen were administered between 30-90 minutes before HBT procedure for minimal sedation. HBT placement was performed on computed tomography (CT) table, with needle advancement under CT-guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatments with minimal sedation were attempted in 63 patients. A total of 244 interstitial implants with 453 needles were placed via CT-guidance. Sixty-one patients (96.8%) tolerated the procedure without any additional intervention, while two patients (3.2%) required the use of epidural anesthesia. None of the patients in the series required a transition to general anesthesia for the procedure. Bleeding, which resolved with short-term vaginal packing, occurred in 22.1% of insertions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our series, the treatment of HBT for cervical cancer with minimal sedation was feasible at a high percentage (96.8%). The ability to perform HBT without GA or CS could be a reasonable option to provide image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) with limited resources, allowing for more widespread use. Further investigations using this technique are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"43-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/ce/JCB-15-50226.PMC10034729.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of outpatient hybrid brachytherapy for cervical cancer with minimal sedation: Results from a single-institutional protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Subhakar Mutyala,&nbsp;Gabriella Smith,&nbsp;Hayden Ansinelli,&nbsp;Nitika Thawani\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jcb.2023.125527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain control techniques during high-dose-rate hybrid intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for cervical cancer vary widely, with many centers opting for general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS). Here, we describe a single-institutional series of patients treated with HBT and ASA-defined minimal sedation, utilizing oral analgesic and anxiolytic medications in substitution for GA or CS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The charts of patients who underwent HBT treatments for cervical cancer from June 2018 to May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Prior to HBT, all patients underwent an exam under anesthesia (EUA), and Smit sleeve placement under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Oral lorazepam and oxycodone/acetaminophen were administered between 30-90 minutes before HBT procedure for minimal sedation. HBT placement was performed on computed tomography (CT) table, with needle advancement under CT-guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatments with minimal sedation were attempted in 63 patients. A total of 244 interstitial implants with 453 needles were placed via CT-guidance. Sixty-one patients (96.8%) tolerated the procedure without any additional intervention, while two patients (3.2%) required the use of epidural anesthesia. None of the patients in the series required a transition to general anesthesia for the procedure. Bleeding, which resolved with short-term vaginal packing, occurred in 22.1% of insertions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our series, the treatment of HBT for cervical cancer with minimal sedation was feasible at a high percentage (96.8%). The ability to perform HBT without GA or CS could be a reasonable option to provide image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) with limited resources, allowing for more widespread use. Further investigations using this technique are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"43-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/ce/JCB-15-50226.PMC10034729.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.125527\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.125527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:宫颈癌高剂量率腔内-间质混合近距离放射治疗(HBT)的疼痛控制技术差异很大,许多中心选择全身麻醉(GA)或清醒镇静(CS)。在这里,我们描述了一个单一机构系列的患者接受HBT和asa定义的最小镇静治疗,使用口服镇痛和抗焦虑药物替代GA或CS。材料与方法:回顾性分析2018年6月至2020年5月宫颈癌HBT治疗患者资料。在HBT之前,所有患者在麻醉下进行检查(EUA),并在全身麻醉或深度镇静下放置Smit套管。在HBT手术前30-90分钟给予口服劳拉西泮和羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚,以达到最小的镇静作用。HBT放置在计算机断层扫描(CT)台上,针在CT引导下推进。结果:63例患者尝试小剂量镇静治疗。通过ct引导,共放置了244个间质种植体,共放置了453根针。61例患者(96.8%)在没有任何额外干预的情况下耐受该手术,2例患者(3.2%)需要使用硬膜外麻醉。该系列中没有患者需要在手术过程中过渡到全身麻醉。在22.1%的插入病例中,出血通过阴道短期填塞解决。结论:在我们的研究中,HBT治疗宫颈癌的低剂量镇静的可能性很高(96.8%)。在没有GA或CS的情况下进行HBT的能力可能是在有限资源下提供图像引导自适应近距离治疗(IGABT)的合理选择,从而允许更广泛的使用。使用这种技术进行进一步的调查是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of outpatient hybrid brachytherapy for cervical cancer with minimal sedation: Results from a single-institutional protocol.

Purpose: Pain control techniques during high-dose-rate hybrid intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for cervical cancer vary widely, with many centers opting for general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS). Here, we describe a single-institutional series of patients treated with HBT and ASA-defined minimal sedation, utilizing oral analgesic and anxiolytic medications in substitution for GA or CS.

Material and methods: The charts of patients who underwent HBT treatments for cervical cancer from June 2018 to May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Prior to HBT, all patients underwent an exam under anesthesia (EUA), and Smit sleeve placement under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Oral lorazepam and oxycodone/acetaminophen were administered between 30-90 minutes before HBT procedure for minimal sedation. HBT placement was performed on computed tomography (CT) table, with needle advancement under CT-guidance.

Results: Treatments with minimal sedation were attempted in 63 patients. A total of 244 interstitial implants with 453 needles were placed via CT-guidance. Sixty-one patients (96.8%) tolerated the procedure without any additional intervention, while two patients (3.2%) required the use of epidural anesthesia. None of the patients in the series required a transition to general anesthesia for the procedure. Bleeding, which resolved with short-term vaginal packing, occurred in 22.1% of insertions.

Conclusions: In our series, the treatment of HBT for cervical cancer with minimal sedation was feasible at a high percentage (96.8%). The ability to perform HBT without GA or CS could be a reasonable option to provide image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) with limited resources, allowing for more widespread use. Further investigations using this technique are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信