溯因逻辑规划与析取逻辑规划:它们的关系与可转移性

Chiaki Sakama , Katsumi Inoue
{"title":"溯因逻辑规划与析取逻辑规划:它们的关系与可转移性","authors":"Chiaki Sakama ,&nbsp;Katsumi Inoue","doi":"10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00073-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Abductive logic programming (ALP) and disjunctive logic programming (DLP) are two different extensions of logic programming. This paper investigates the relationship between ALP and DLP from the program transformation viewpoint. It is shown that the belief set semantics of an abductive program is expressed by the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program. In converse, the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program is equivalently expressed by the belief set semantics of an abductive program, while such a transformation is generally impossible for the answer set semantics. Moreover, it is shown that abductive disjunctive programs are always reducible to disjunctive programs both under the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics. These transformations are verified from the complexity viewpoint. The results of this paper turn out that ALP and DLP are just different ways of looking at the same problem if we choose an appropriate semantics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101236,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Logic Programming","volume":"44 1","pages":"Pages 75-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00073-4","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abductive logic programming and disjunctive logic programming: their relationship and transferability\",\"authors\":\"Chiaki Sakama ,&nbsp;Katsumi Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00073-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Abductive logic programming (ALP) and disjunctive logic programming (DLP) are two different extensions of logic programming. This paper investigates the relationship between ALP and DLP from the program transformation viewpoint. It is shown that the belief set semantics of an abductive program is expressed by the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program. In converse, the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program is equivalently expressed by the belief set semantics of an abductive program, while such a transformation is generally impossible for the answer set semantics. Moreover, it is shown that abductive disjunctive programs are always reducible to disjunctive programs both under the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics. These transformations are verified from the complexity viewpoint. The results of this paper turn out that ALP and DLP are just different ways of looking at the same problem if we choose an appropriate semantics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Logic Programming\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 75-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00073-4\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Logic Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743106699000734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Logic Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743106699000734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

溯因逻辑规划(ALP)和析取逻辑规划(DLP)是逻辑规划的两个不同的扩展。本文从程序转换的角度研究了ALP与DLP之间的关系。证明了溯因规划的信念集语义由析取规划的答案集语义和可能的模型语义表示。反之,析取规划的可能模型语义等价地表示为溯因规划的信念集语义,而答案集语义一般不可能进行这样的转换。此外,还证明了溯因析取规划在答案集语义和可能模型语义下总是可约为析取规划。从复杂性的角度验证这些转换。本文的结果表明,如果我们选择合适的语义,ALP和DLP只是看待同一个问题的不同方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abductive logic programming and disjunctive logic programming: their relationship and transferability

Abductive logic programming (ALP) and disjunctive logic programming (DLP) are two different extensions of logic programming. This paper investigates the relationship between ALP and DLP from the program transformation viewpoint. It is shown that the belief set semantics of an abductive program is expressed by the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program. In converse, the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program is equivalently expressed by the belief set semantics of an abductive program, while such a transformation is generally impossible for the answer set semantics. Moreover, it is shown that abductive disjunctive programs are always reducible to disjunctive programs both under the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics. These transformations are verified from the complexity viewpoint. The results of this paper turn out that ALP and DLP are just different ways of looking at the same problem if we choose an appropriate semantics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信