{"title":"溯因逻辑规划与析取逻辑规划:它们的关系与可转移性","authors":"Chiaki Sakama , Katsumi Inoue","doi":"10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00073-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Abductive logic programming (ALP) and disjunctive logic programming (DLP) are two different extensions of logic programming. This paper investigates the relationship between ALP and DLP from the program transformation viewpoint. It is shown that the belief set semantics of an abductive program is expressed by the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program. In converse, the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program is equivalently expressed by the belief set semantics of an abductive program, while such a transformation is generally impossible for the answer set semantics. Moreover, it is shown that abductive disjunctive programs are always reducible to disjunctive programs both under the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics. These transformations are verified from the complexity viewpoint. The results of this paper turn out that ALP and DLP are just different ways of looking at the same problem if we choose an appropriate semantics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101236,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Logic Programming","volume":"44 1","pages":"Pages 75-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00073-4","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abductive logic programming and disjunctive logic programming: their relationship and transferability\",\"authors\":\"Chiaki Sakama , Katsumi Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00073-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Abductive logic programming (ALP) and disjunctive logic programming (DLP) are two different extensions of logic programming. This paper investigates the relationship between ALP and DLP from the program transformation viewpoint. It is shown that the belief set semantics of an abductive program is expressed by the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program. In converse, the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program is equivalently expressed by the belief set semantics of an abductive program, while such a transformation is generally impossible for the answer set semantics. Moreover, it is shown that abductive disjunctive programs are always reducible to disjunctive programs both under the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics. These transformations are verified from the complexity viewpoint. The results of this paper turn out that ALP and DLP are just different ways of looking at the same problem if we choose an appropriate semantics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Logic Programming\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 75-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00073-4\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Logic Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743106699000734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Logic Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743106699000734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abductive logic programming and disjunctive logic programming: their relationship and transferability
Abductive logic programming (ALP) and disjunctive logic programming (DLP) are two different extensions of logic programming. This paper investigates the relationship between ALP and DLP from the program transformation viewpoint. It is shown that the belief set semantics of an abductive program is expressed by the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program. In converse, the possible model semantics of a disjunctive program is equivalently expressed by the belief set semantics of an abductive program, while such a transformation is generally impossible for the answer set semantics. Moreover, it is shown that abductive disjunctive programs are always reducible to disjunctive programs both under the answer set semantics and the possible model semantics. These transformations are verified from the complexity viewpoint. The results of this paper turn out that ALP and DLP are just different ways of looking at the same problem if we choose an appropriate semantics.