类别特异性功能磁共振成像与图片命名的相关性:一项针对阿拉伯人和菲律宾人的研究

IF 1.2 3区 心理学 Q2 LINGUISTICS
Haythum O. Tayeb , Jamaan Alghamdi , Naushad Ahmed , Yousef Alsawwaf , Khalid Alsafi , Abrar Baduwailan , Bassam Yaghmoor , Tariq Elyas , Mohammed Mudarris , Daniel S. Weisholtz
{"title":"类别特异性功能磁共振成像与图片命名的相关性:一项针对阿拉伯人和菲律宾人的研究","authors":"Haythum O. Tayeb ,&nbsp;Jamaan Alghamdi ,&nbsp;Naushad Ahmed ,&nbsp;Yousef Alsawwaf ,&nbsp;Khalid Alsafi ,&nbsp;Abrar Baduwailan ,&nbsp;Bassam Yaghmoor ,&nbsp;Tariq Elyas ,&nbsp;Mohammed Mudarris ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Weisholtz","doi":"10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Cross cultural neuroimaging work has demonstrated differences in neural correlates of some cognitive processes between individuals from different cultures, often comparing American and Chinese subjects. In contrast, a limited number of studies examined Arab and/or Filipino participants. This fMRI study aimed to demonstrate </span>neural activations<span> during animal and tool picture naming by 18 healthy Arabs and 18 healthy Filipino participants. In animal naming contrasted with tool naming, Arabs preferentially activated regions in the right lateral occipital and fusiform cortices, whereas Filipinos recruited bilateral visual areas. Cross-group comparisons of animal naming revealed that Arabs recruited right visual areas more than Filipinos, who in turn recruited the cerebellum more than Arabs. In tool naming, Arabs preferentially activated a predominantly left frontoparietal network, whereas no regions were identified in Filipinos, and no differences in activation between groups were found. Using a low-demand picture-naming task, this study revealed category-specific neural activations during picture naming by Arabs and Filipinos, as well as between-group differences in animal naming. The results suggest that Arabs and Filipinos may have culture-specific differences in processing animate and inanimate pictures, and caution against generalizing findings from the more commonly studied populations, especially in verbal tasks such as picture naming.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurolinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Category-specific fMRI correlates of picture naming: A study with Arabs and Filipinos\",\"authors\":\"Haythum O. Tayeb ,&nbsp;Jamaan Alghamdi ,&nbsp;Naushad Ahmed ,&nbsp;Yousef Alsawwaf ,&nbsp;Khalid Alsafi ,&nbsp;Abrar Baduwailan ,&nbsp;Bassam Yaghmoor ,&nbsp;Tariq Elyas ,&nbsp;Mohammed Mudarris ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Weisholtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Cross cultural neuroimaging work has demonstrated differences in neural correlates of some cognitive processes between individuals from different cultures, often comparing American and Chinese subjects. In contrast, a limited number of studies examined Arab and/or Filipino participants. This fMRI study aimed to demonstrate </span>neural activations<span> during animal and tool picture naming by 18 healthy Arabs and 18 healthy Filipino participants. In animal naming contrasted with tool naming, Arabs preferentially activated regions in the right lateral occipital and fusiform cortices, whereas Filipinos recruited bilateral visual areas. Cross-group comparisons of animal naming revealed that Arabs recruited right visual areas more than Filipinos, who in turn recruited the cerebellum more than Arabs. In tool naming, Arabs preferentially activated a predominantly left frontoparietal network, whereas no regions were identified in Filipinos, and no differences in activation between groups were found. Using a low-demand picture-naming task, this study revealed category-specific neural activations during picture naming by Arabs and Filipinos, as well as between-group differences in animal naming. The results suggest that Arabs and Filipinos may have culture-specific differences in processing animate and inanimate pictures, and caution against generalizing findings from the more commonly studied populations, especially in verbal tasks such as picture naming.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurolinguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurolinguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0911604422000094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurolinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0911604422000094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨文化神经影像学研究表明,来自不同文化的个体在某些认知过程的神经相关物上存在差异,通常比较的是美国和中国的受试者。相比之下,对阿拉伯和/或菲律宾参与者的研究数量有限。本fMRI研究旨在证明18名健康的阿拉伯人和18名健康的菲律宾人在动物和工具图片命名时的神经激活。在动物命名和工具命名方面,阿拉伯人优先激活右侧枕侧和梭状皮质区域,而菲律宾人则激活双侧视觉区域。动物命名的跨组比较显示,阿拉伯人比菲律宾人更需要右眼视区,而菲律宾人又比阿拉伯人更需要小脑。在工具命名中,阿拉伯人优先激活了一个主要是左侧的额顶叶网络,而菲律宾人没有发现这一区域,两组之间的激活也没有发现差异。通过低要求的图片命名任务,本研究揭示了阿拉伯人和菲律宾人在图片命名过程中特定类别的神经激活,以及动物命名的组间差异。研究结果表明,阿拉伯人和菲律宾人在处理有生命和无生命的图片方面可能存在文化差异,并警告不要将更常见的研究人群的发现普遍化,尤其是在诸如图片命名之类的口头任务中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Category-specific fMRI correlates of picture naming: A study with Arabs and Filipinos

Cross cultural neuroimaging work has demonstrated differences in neural correlates of some cognitive processes between individuals from different cultures, often comparing American and Chinese subjects. In contrast, a limited number of studies examined Arab and/or Filipino participants. This fMRI study aimed to demonstrate neural activations during animal and tool picture naming by 18 healthy Arabs and 18 healthy Filipino participants. In animal naming contrasted with tool naming, Arabs preferentially activated regions in the right lateral occipital and fusiform cortices, whereas Filipinos recruited bilateral visual areas. Cross-group comparisons of animal naming revealed that Arabs recruited right visual areas more than Filipinos, who in turn recruited the cerebellum more than Arabs. In tool naming, Arabs preferentially activated a predominantly left frontoparietal network, whereas no regions were identified in Filipinos, and no differences in activation between groups were found. Using a low-demand picture-naming task, this study revealed category-specific neural activations during picture naming by Arabs and Filipinos, as well as between-group differences in animal naming. The results suggest that Arabs and Filipinos may have culture-specific differences in processing animate and inanimate pictures, and caution against generalizing findings from the more commonly studied populations, especially in verbal tasks such as picture naming.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurolinguistics
Journal of Neurolinguistics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
17.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurolinguistics is an international forum for the integration of the neurosciences and language sciences. JNL provides for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the interaction between language, communication and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in communication and its breakdowns. Contributions from neurology, communication disorders, linguistics, neuropsychology and cognitive science in general are welcome. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of language or speech function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import. Interdisciplinary work on any aspect of the biological foundations of language and its disorders resulting from brain damage is encouraged. Studies of normal subjects, with clear reference to brain functions, are appropriate. Group-studies on well defined samples and case studies with well documented lesion or nervous system dysfunction are acceptable. The journal is open to empirical reports and review articles. Special issues on aspects of the relation between language and the structure and function of the nervous system are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信