Anke Behnke, Anne Cayre, Giovanna De Maglio, Giuseppe Giannini, Lionel Habran, Marina Tarsitano, Massimiliano Chetta, David Cappellen, Alexandra Lespagnol, Cecile Le Naoures, Gabriella Massazza, Annarita Destro, Irina Bonzheim, Achim Rau, Achim Battmann, Bettina Kah, Emmanuel Watkin, Michael Hummel
{"title":"便利:一项真实世界,多中心,前瞻性研究,调查快速,全自动实时PCR检测方法与局部参考方法在检测非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体变异方面的实用性。","authors":"Anke Behnke, Anne Cayre, Giovanna De Maglio, Giuseppe Giannini, Lionel Habran, Marina Tarsitano, Massimiliano Chetta, David Cappellen, Alexandra Lespagnol, Cecile Le Naoures, Gabriella Massazza, Annarita Destro, Irina Bonzheim, Achim Rau, Achim Battmann, Bettina Kah, Emmanuel Watkin, Michael Hummel","doi":"10.3389/pore.2023.1610707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) variants is essential for informing treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Automated diagnostic workflows may allow more streamlined initiation of targeted treatments, where appropriate, while comprehensive variant analysis is ongoing. FACILITATE, a real-world, prospective, multicenter, European study, evaluated performance and analytical turnaround time of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test compared with local reference methods. Sixteen sites obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy samples with ≥ 10% neoplastic cells from patients with NSCLC. Consecutive 5 μm sections from patient samples were tested for clinically relevant NSCLC-associated <i>EGFR</i> variants using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test and local reference methods; performance (concordance) and analytical turnaround time were compared. Between January 2019 and November 2020, 1,474 parallel analyses were conducted. Overall percentage agreement was 97.7% [<i>n</i> = 1,418; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.3], positive agreement, 87.4% (<i>n</i> = 182; 95% CI: 81.8-91.4) and negative agreement, 99.2% (<i>n</i> = 1,236; 95% CI: 98.5-99.6). There were 38 (2.6%) discordant cases. Ninety percent of results were returned with an analytical turnaround time of within 1 week using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test versus ∼22 days using reference methods. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test performed well versus local methods and had shorter analytical turnaround time. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test can thus support application of personalized medicine in NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19981,"journal":{"name":"Pathology & Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927408/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FACILITATE: A real-world, multicenter, prospective study investigating the utility of a rapid, fully automated real-time PCR assay versus local reference methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor variants in NSCLC.\",\"authors\":\"Anke Behnke, Anne Cayre, Giovanna De Maglio, Giuseppe Giannini, Lionel Habran, Marina Tarsitano, Massimiliano Chetta, David Cappellen, Alexandra Lespagnol, Cecile Le Naoures, Gabriella Massazza, Annarita Destro, Irina Bonzheim, Achim Rau, Achim Battmann, Bettina Kah, Emmanuel Watkin, Michael Hummel\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/pore.2023.1610707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) variants is essential for informing treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Automated diagnostic workflows may allow more streamlined initiation of targeted treatments, where appropriate, while comprehensive variant analysis is ongoing. FACILITATE, a real-world, prospective, multicenter, European study, evaluated performance and analytical turnaround time of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test compared with local reference methods. Sixteen sites obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy samples with ≥ 10% neoplastic cells from patients with NSCLC. Consecutive 5 μm sections from patient samples were tested for clinically relevant NSCLC-associated <i>EGFR</i> variants using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test and local reference methods; performance (concordance) and analytical turnaround time were compared. Between January 2019 and November 2020, 1,474 parallel analyses were conducted. Overall percentage agreement was 97.7% [<i>n</i> = 1,418; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.3], positive agreement, 87.4% (<i>n</i> = 182; 95% CI: 81.8-91.4) and negative agreement, 99.2% (<i>n</i> = 1,236; 95% CI: 98.5-99.6). There were 38 (2.6%) discordant cases. Ninety percent of results were returned with an analytical turnaround time of within 1 week using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test versus ∼22 days using reference methods. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test performed well versus local methods and had shorter analytical turnaround time. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test can thus support application of personalized medicine in NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology & Oncology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology & Oncology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2023.1610707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology & Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2023.1610707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
FACILITATE: A real-world, multicenter, prospective study investigating the utility of a rapid, fully automated real-time PCR assay versus local reference methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor variants in NSCLC.
Accurate testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variants is essential for informing treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Automated diagnostic workflows may allow more streamlined initiation of targeted treatments, where appropriate, while comprehensive variant analysis is ongoing. FACILITATE, a real-world, prospective, multicenter, European study, evaluated performance and analytical turnaround time of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test compared with local reference methods. Sixteen sites obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy samples with ≥ 10% neoplastic cells from patients with NSCLC. Consecutive 5 μm sections from patient samples were tested for clinically relevant NSCLC-associated EGFR variants using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test and local reference methods; performance (concordance) and analytical turnaround time were compared. Between January 2019 and November 2020, 1,474 parallel analyses were conducted. Overall percentage agreement was 97.7% [n = 1,418; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.3], positive agreement, 87.4% (n = 182; 95% CI: 81.8-91.4) and negative agreement, 99.2% (n = 1,236; 95% CI: 98.5-99.6). There were 38 (2.6%) discordant cases. Ninety percent of results were returned with an analytical turnaround time of within 1 week using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test versus ∼22 days using reference methods. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test performed well versus local methods and had shorter analytical turnaround time. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test can thus support application of personalized medicine in NSCLC.
期刊介绍:
Pathology & Oncology Research (POR) is an interdisciplinary Journal at the interface of pathology and oncology including the preclinical and translational research, diagnostics and therapy. Furthermore, POR is an international forum for the rapid communication of reviews, original research, critical and topical reports with excellence and novelty. Published quarterly, POR is dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments on the selected biomedical fields bridging the gap between basic research and clinical medicine. It is a special aim for POR to promote pathological and oncological publishing activity of colleagues in the Central and East European region. The journal will be of interest to pathologists, and a broad range of experimental and clinical oncologists, and related experts. POR is supported by an acknowledged international advisory board and the Arányi Fundation for modern pathology.