{"title":"新辅助化疗在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌膀胱保留入路中的作用","authors":"Carlos Stecca , Timur Mitin , Srikala S. Sridhar","doi":"10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which aims to eliminate micrometastatic disease, has been established as the </span>standard of care<span> for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing </span></span>radical cystectomy<span> (RC). This is based on randomized controlled trials<span> showing a survival benefit of NAC prior to RC compared to RC alone. It was anticipated that a similar survival benefit would also be seen when NAC was given prior to bladder preserving approaches, but the e phase III RTOG 8903 study which explored this concept was reported to be a negative study. However, there are a number of important caveats to be considered. First, the profile of patients opting for bladder preservation has changed from the older, frailer non-surgical candidates, to now also include younger, fitter patients opting for bladder preservation and who are also more likely to tolerate NAC. In recent years, there have also been important advances in systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation techniques, and supportive care. As such revisitng the role of NAC prior to bladder preserving approaches in MIBC appears warranted.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49542,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 51-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Preservation Approaches in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Stecca , Timur Mitin , Srikala S. Sridhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which aims to eliminate micrometastatic disease, has been established as the </span>standard of care<span> for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing </span></span>radical cystectomy<span> (RC). This is based on randomized controlled trials<span> showing a survival benefit of NAC prior to RC compared to RC alone. It was anticipated that a similar survival benefit would also be seen when NAC was given prior to bladder preserving approaches, but the e phase III RTOG 8903 study which explored this concept was reported to be a negative study. However, there are a number of important caveats to be considered. First, the profile of patients opting for bladder preservation has changed from the older, frailer non-surgical candidates, to now also include younger, fitter patients opting for bladder preservation and who are also more likely to tolerate NAC. In recent years, there have also been important advances in systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation techniques, and supportive care. As such revisitng the role of NAC prior to bladder preserving approaches in MIBC appears warranted.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429622000601\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429622000601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Preservation Approaches in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which aims to eliminate micrometastatic disease, has been established as the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). This is based on randomized controlled trials showing a survival benefit of NAC prior to RC compared to RC alone. It was anticipated that a similar survival benefit would also be seen when NAC was given prior to bladder preserving approaches, but the e phase III RTOG 8903 study which explored this concept was reported to be a negative study. However, there are a number of important caveats to be considered. First, the profile of patients opting for bladder preservation has changed from the older, frailer non-surgical candidates, to now also include younger, fitter patients opting for bladder preservation and who are also more likely to tolerate NAC. In recent years, there have also been important advances in systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation techniques, and supportive care. As such revisitng the role of NAC prior to bladder preserving approaches in MIBC appears warranted.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Radiation Oncology is compiled by a guest editor to address a specific topic in the specialty, presenting definitive information on areas of rapid change and development. A significant number of articles report new scientific information. Topics covered include tumor biology, diagnosis, medical and surgical management of the patient, and new technologies.