{"title":"不确定细胞学甲状腺结节的分子检测:一项健康技术评估。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The thyroid is a gland in the lower neck that is responsible for secreting hormones related to growth and metabolism. A cancer growth in the thyroid can spread to other parts of the body, but most thyroid nodules (growths) are benign, and some types of thyroid cancer are nonaggressive and can be managed with active surveillance only. We conducted a health technology assessment of molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, which included an evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding molecular testing, and patient preferences and values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Risk of Bias Among Systematic Review (ROBIS) tool for systematic reviews, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) assessment for primary studies that evaluated diagnostic accuracy, and the Risk of Bias tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS) for primary studies that evaluated clinical utility. We evaluated the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature review and conducted cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses with a 5-year time horizon from the Ontario Ministry of Health perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, we spoke to people with thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the clinical evidence review, we included one systematic review, which contained eight relevant primary studies. Using molecular testing to support the rule-out of cancer in thyroid nodules of indeterminate significance may reduce the number of unnecessary surgeries. For diagnostic accuracy, molecular testing for a diagnosis of malignancy in a nodule of indeterminate significance had a sensitivity of 91% to 94% and a specificity of 68% to 82% (GRADE: Low). As well, lower rates of surgical resections were reported in nodules of indeterminate cytology (GRADE: Very Low). Compared to diagnostic lobectomy, we found that molecular testing would increase the probability of predicting a correct diagnosis, reduce the probability of unnecessary surgery, and lead to a slight improvement in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), but it would increase costs. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $220,572 to $298,653 per QALY gained. At the commonly used willingness-to-pay values of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY gained, molecular testing was unlikely to be cost-effective (probability of molecular testing being cost-effective was less than 50%). Publicly funding molecular testing in Ontario over the next 5 years would lead to an additional cost of $6.24 million. People with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology reported on the benefits and drawbacks of molecular testing, as well as barriers to accessing and choosing to undergo molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, molecular testing may have diagnostic accuracy as a rule-out test, and it may result in fewer nodule resections than usual care (no molecular testing). For people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, molecular testing at the current list price is unlikely to be cost-effective compared to diagnostic lobectomy. Publicly funding molecular testing in Ontario would cost about $6.24 million over the next 5 years. People with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology valued the information that could be provided by molecular testing, but they expressed concern about the time required to obtain results, especially if the findings were not conclusive or useful for treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":39160,"journal":{"name":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","volume":"22 2","pages":"1-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095064/pdf/ohtas-22-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Testing for Thyroid Nodules of Indeterminate Cytology: A Health Technology Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The thyroid is a gland in the lower neck that is responsible for secreting hormones related to growth and metabolism. A cancer growth in the thyroid can spread to other parts of the body, but most thyroid nodules (growths) are benign, and some types of thyroid cancer are nonaggressive and can be managed with active surveillance only. We conducted a health technology assessment of molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, which included an evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding molecular testing, and patient preferences and values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Risk of Bias Among Systematic Review (ROBIS) tool for systematic reviews, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) assessment for primary studies that evaluated diagnostic accuracy, and the Risk of Bias tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS) for primary studies that evaluated clinical utility. We evaluated the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature review and conducted cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses with a 5-year time horizon from the Ontario Ministry of Health perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, we spoke to people with thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the clinical evidence review, we included one systematic review, which contained eight relevant primary studies. Using molecular testing to support the rule-out of cancer in thyroid nodules of indeterminate significance may reduce the number of unnecessary surgeries. For diagnostic accuracy, molecular testing for a diagnosis of malignancy in a nodule of indeterminate significance had a sensitivity of 91% to 94% and a specificity of 68% to 82% (GRADE: Low). As well, lower rates of surgical resections were reported in nodules of indeterminate cytology (GRADE: Very Low). Compared to diagnostic lobectomy, we found that molecular testing would increase the probability of predicting a correct diagnosis, reduce the probability of unnecessary surgery, and lead to a slight improvement in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), but it would increase costs. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $220,572 to $298,653 per QALY gained. At the commonly used willingness-to-pay values of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY gained, molecular testing was unlikely to be cost-effective (probability of molecular testing being cost-effective was less than 50%). Publicly funding molecular testing in Ontario over the next 5 years would lead to an additional cost of $6.24 million. People with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology reported on the benefits and drawbacks of molecular testing, as well as barriers to accessing and choosing to undergo molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, molecular testing may have diagnostic accuracy as a rule-out test, and it may result in fewer nodule resections than usual care (no molecular testing). For people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, molecular testing at the current list price is unlikely to be cost-effective compared to diagnostic lobectomy. Publicly funding molecular testing in Ontario would cost about $6.24 million over the next 5 years. People with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology valued the information that could be provided by molecular testing, but they expressed concern about the time required to obtain results, especially if the findings were not conclusive or useful for treatment decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"1-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095064/pdf/ohtas-22-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:甲状腺是下颈部的一个腺体,负责分泌与生长和代谢有关的激素。甲状腺癌的生长可以扩散到身体的其他部位,但大多数甲状腺结节(生长)是良性的,有些类型的甲状腺癌是非侵袭性的,只能通过主动监测来治疗。我们对细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节患者进行了分子检测的卫生技术评估,包括诊断准确性、临床效用、成本效益、公共资助分子检测的预算影响以及患者的偏好和价值观。方法:对临床证据进行系统的文献检索。我们对每个纳入研究的偏倚风险进行了评估,使用系统评价的偏倚风险(ROBIS)工具,评估诊断准确性的主要研究的诊断准确性质量评估2 (QUADAS-2)评估,评估临床效用的主要研究的非随机研究的偏倚风险工具(RoBANS)。我们根据建议分级评估、发展和评估(GRADE)工作组标准评估证据体的质量。我们进行了系统的经济文献综述,并从安大略省卫生部的角度进行了5年时间范围内的成本效益和成本效用分析。我们还分析了安大略省对不确定细胞学的甲状腺结节患者进行分子检测的公共资助对预算的影响。为了了解分子检测在细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节患者中的潜在价值,我们采访了甲状腺结节患者。结果:在临床证据综述中,我们纳入了一项系统综述,其中包含8项相关的初步研究。使用分子检测来支持不确定意义的甲状腺结节的癌症排除可能减少不必要的手术次数。对于诊断的准确性,分子检测诊断恶性肿瘤的不确定结节的敏感性为91%至94%,特异性为68%至82% (GRADE: Low)。同样,在细胞学不确定的结节中,手术切除率也较低(GRADE: Very Low)。与诊断性肺叶切除术相比,我们发现分子检测可以增加预测正确诊断的概率,减少不必要手术的概率,并导致质量调整生命年(QALYs)的轻微改善,但会增加成本。由此产生的增量成本效益比为每增加的质量质量220 572美元至298 653美元。在通常使用的支付意愿值为每个获得的质量aly $50,000和$100,000时,分子检测不太可能具有成本效益(分子检测具有成本效益的概率小于50%)。在接下来的5年里,安大略省为分子检测提供的公共资金将导致624万美元的额外费用。细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节患者报告了分子检测的优点和缺点,以及获取和选择进行分子检测的障碍。结论:对于细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节,分子检测作为一种排除性检测可能具有诊断准确性,并且与常规治疗(不进行分子检测)相比,分子检测可能导致更少的结节切除。对于细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节患者,与诊断性肺叶切除术相比,目前目录价格的分子检测不太可能具有成本效益。安大略省的分子检测将在未来5年内耗资约624万美元。细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节患者重视分子检测提供的信息,但他们对获得结果所需的时间表示担忧,特别是如果结果不是决定性的或对治疗决策有用的。
Molecular Testing for Thyroid Nodules of Indeterminate Cytology: A Health Technology Assessment.
Background: The thyroid is a gland in the lower neck that is responsible for secreting hormones related to growth and metabolism. A cancer growth in the thyroid can spread to other parts of the body, but most thyroid nodules (growths) are benign, and some types of thyroid cancer are nonaggressive and can be managed with active surveillance only. We conducted a health technology assessment of molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, which included an evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding molecular testing, and patient preferences and values.
Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Risk of Bias Among Systematic Review (ROBIS) tool for systematic reviews, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) assessment for primary studies that evaluated diagnostic accuracy, and the Risk of Bias tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS) for primary studies that evaluated clinical utility. We evaluated the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature review and conducted cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses with a 5-year time horizon from the Ontario Ministry of Health perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of molecular testing in people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, we spoke to people with thyroid nodules.
Results: In the clinical evidence review, we included one systematic review, which contained eight relevant primary studies. Using molecular testing to support the rule-out of cancer in thyroid nodules of indeterminate significance may reduce the number of unnecessary surgeries. For diagnostic accuracy, molecular testing for a diagnosis of malignancy in a nodule of indeterminate significance had a sensitivity of 91% to 94% and a specificity of 68% to 82% (GRADE: Low). As well, lower rates of surgical resections were reported in nodules of indeterminate cytology (GRADE: Very Low). Compared to diagnostic lobectomy, we found that molecular testing would increase the probability of predicting a correct diagnosis, reduce the probability of unnecessary surgery, and lead to a slight improvement in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), but it would increase costs. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $220,572 to $298,653 per QALY gained. At the commonly used willingness-to-pay values of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY gained, molecular testing was unlikely to be cost-effective (probability of molecular testing being cost-effective was less than 50%). Publicly funding molecular testing in Ontario over the next 5 years would lead to an additional cost of $6.24 million. People with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology reported on the benefits and drawbacks of molecular testing, as well as barriers to accessing and choosing to undergo molecular testing.
Conclusions: For thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, molecular testing may have diagnostic accuracy as a rule-out test, and it may result in fewer nodule resections than usual care (no molecular testing). For people with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology, molecular testing at the current list price is unlikely to be cost-effective compared to diagnostic lobectomy. Publicly funding molecular testing in Ontario would cost about $6.24 million over the next 5 years. People with thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology valued the information that could be provided by molecular testing, but they expressed concern about the time required to obtain results, especially if the findings were not conclusive or useful for treatment decision-making.