颞动脉活检:什么时候值得头痛?

Q3 Medicine
Wisconsin Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-01
Bronson T Bomkamp, Andrew J Borgert, Alec J Fitzsimmons, Travis J Smith, Irina Shakhnovich, Jacob R Peschman
{"title":"颞动脉活检:什么时候值得头痛?","authors":"Bronson T Bomkamp,&nbsp;Andrew J Borgert,&nbsp;Alec J Fitzsimmons,&nbsp;Travis J Smith,&nbsp;Irina Shakhnovich,&nbsp;Jacob R Peschman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporal artery biopsy is ordered when clinical symptoms and an elevated C-reactive protein values and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rates suggest giant cell arteritis. The percentage of temporal artery biopsies positive for giant cell arteritis is low. The objectives of our study were to analyze the diagnostic yield of temporal artery biopsies at an independent academic medical center and to develop a risk stratification model for triaging patients for possible temporal artery biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of all patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy in our institution from January 2010 through February 2020. We compared clinical symptoms and inflammatory marker (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) values of patients whose specimens were positive for giant cell arteritis with those of patients with negative specimens. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression. A risk stratification tool, which included point assignments and measures of performance, was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 497 temporal artery biopsies for giant cell arteritis performed, 66 were positive and 431 were negative. Jaw/tongue claudication, elevated inflammatory marker values, and age were associated with a positive result. Using our risk stratification tool, 3.4% of low-risk patients, 14.5% of medium-risk patients, and 43.9% of high-risk patients were positive for giant cell arteritis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Jaw/tongue claudication, age, and elevated inflammatory markers were associated with positive biopsy results. Our diagnostic yield was much lower when compared with a benchmark yield determined in a published systematic review. A risk stratification tool was developed based on age and the presence of independent risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":38747,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","volume":"122 1","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Artery Biopsy: When Is It Worth the Headache?\",\"authors\":\"Bronson T Bomkamp,&nbsp;Andrew J Borgert,&nbsp;Alec J Fitzsimmons,&nbsp;Travis J Smith,&nbsp;Irina Shakhnovich,&nbsp;Jacob R Peschman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporal artery biopsy is ordered when clinical symptoms and an elevated C-reactive protein values and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rates suggest giant cell arteritis. The percentage of temporal artery biopsies positive for giant cell arteritis is low. The objectives of our study were to analyze the diagnostic yield of temporal artery biopsies at an independent academic medical center and to develop a risk stratification model for triaging patients for possible temporal artery biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of all patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy in our institution from January 2010 through February 2020. We compared clinical symptoms and inflammatory marker (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) values of patients whose specimens were positive for giant cell arteritis with those of patients with negative specimens. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression. A risk stratification tool, which included point assignments and measures of performance, was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 497 temporal artery biopsies for giant cell arteritis performed, 66 were positive and 431 were negative. Jaw/tongue claudication, elevated inflammatory marker values, and age were associated with a positive result. Using our risk stratification tool, 3.4% of low-risk patients, 14.5% of medium-risk patients, and 43.9% of high-risk patients were positive for giant cell arteritis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Jaw/tongue claudication, age, and elevated inflammatory markers were associated with positive biopsy results. Our diagnostic yield was much lower when compared with a benchmark yield determined in a published systematic review. A risk stratification tool was developed based on age and the presence of independent risk factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wisconsin Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"38-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wisconsin Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当临床症状和升高的c反应蛋白值和/或红细胞沉降率提示巨细胞动脉炎时,建议进行颞动脉活检。巨细胞动脉炎颞动脉活检阳性的百分比很低。本研究的目的是分析独立学术医疗中心颞动脉活检的诊断率,并建立一个风险分层模型,用于对可能进行颞动脉活检的患者进行分类。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了2010年1月至2020年2月在我院接受颞动脉活检的所有患者的电子健康记录。我们比较巨细胞动脉炎标本阳性和阴性患者的临床症状和炎症标志物(c反应蛋白和红细胞沉降率)值。统计分析包括描述性统计、卡方检验和多变量logistic回归。开发了一种风险分层工具,其中包括点分配和绩效度量。结果:497例巨细胞性动脉炎颞动脉活检阳性66例,阴性431例。下颌/舌头跛行、炎症标志物升高和年龄与阳性结果相关。使用我们的风险分层工具,3.4%的低危患者、14.5%的中危患者和43.9%的高危患者巨细胞动脉炎呈阳性。结论:颌/舌跛行、年龄和炎症标志物升高与活检阳性结果相关。与已发表的系统评价中确定的基准产率相比,我们的诊断产率要低得多。基于年龄和独立危险因素的存在,开发了一种风险分层工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal Artery Biopsy: When Is It Worth the Headache?

Background: Temporal artery biopsy is ordered when clinical symptoms and an elevated C-reactive protein values and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rates suggest giant cell arteritis. The percentage of temporal artery biopsies positive for giant cell arteritis is low. The objectives of our study were to analyze the diagnostic yield of temporal artery biopsies at an independent academic medical center and to develop a risk stratification model for triaging patients for possible temporal artery biopsy.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of all patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy in our institution from January 2010 through February 2020. We compared clinical symptoms and inflammatory marker (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) values of patients whose specimens were positive for giant cell arteritis with those of patients with negative specimens. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression. A risk stratification tool, which included point assignments and measures of performance, was developed.

Results: Of 497 temporal artery biopsies for giant cell arteritis performed, 66 were positive and 431 were negative. Jaw/tongue claudication, elevated inflammatory marker values, and age were associated with a positive result. Using our risk stratification tool, 3.4% of low-risk patients, 14.5% of medium-risk patients, and 43.9% of high-risk patients were positive for giant cell arteritis.

Conclusions: Jaw/tongue claudication, age, and elevated inflammatory markers were associated with positive biopsy results. Our diagnostic yield was much lower when compared with a benchmark yield determined in a published systematic review. A risk stratification tool was developed based on age and the presence of independent risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wisconsin Medical Journal
Wisconsin Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Wisconsin Medical Society is the largest association of medical doctors in the state with more than 12,000 members dedicated to the best interests of their patients. With that in mind, wisconsinmedicalsociety.org offers patients a unique source for reliable, physician-reviewed medical information. The Wisconsin Medical Society has been a trusted source for health policy leadership since 1841.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信