选择供体时测量GFR,该做还是不该做?这就是问题所在。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Iranian journal of kidney diseases Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Shiva Samavat, Homa Masrour, Azadeh Ahmadikoomleh, Ali Reza Khoshdel, Mohsen Nafar, Nooshin Dalili, Ahmad Firouzan, Fatemeh Poorrezagholi, Fariba Samadian, Samaneh Hoseinzadeh
{"title":"选择供体时测量GFR,该做还是不该做?这就是问题所在。","authors":"Shiva Samavat,&nbsp;Homa Masrour,&nbsp;Azadeh Ahmadikoomleh,&nbsp;Ali Reza Khoshdel,&nbsp;Mohsen Nafar,&nbsp;Nooshin Dalili,&nbsp;Ahmad Firouzan,&nbsp;Fatemeh Poorrezagholi,&nbsp;Fariba Samadian,&nbsp;Samaneh Hoseinzadeh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The accurate assessment of the pre-donation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a crucial step in donor selection. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to identify the best equation to estimate GFR and the necessity of a radio-nuclear scan in GFR evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 154 potential donors were enrolled, and GFR equations (the MDRD study, the CKD-EPI study, and the full age spectrum [FAS]), and creatinine clearance were compared with measured GFR (mGFR) by the radio-nuclear method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study results indicate that Potential donors had an mGFR of 95.56 ± 15.57 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Though body surface area (BSA) adjusted full age spectrum (FAS) and CKD-EPI equations were most correlated with mGFR, the correlation coefficients were weak (ICC: 0.3 and 0.32, respectively). Misclassification at the cut-off of 80 cc/min/ 1.73 m2 was about 42% for both equations. Besides, 16.8% of donors with eGFR more than 80 cc/min/ 1.73 m2 had a difference in split renal function, and 57.1% of participants had a > 2% probability of having an mGFR < 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If the nuclear scan is easily available, we suggest measuring GFR by 99mTc -DTPA scan as the preferred method. Otherwise, our data suggest utilizing mGFR in patients with high body mass index, size asymmetry in CT-scan, eGFR less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with FAS and/or CKD-EPI equation as these factors deviated the estimated GFR, and also in those with inaccurate creatinine clearance measurements or with posttest probability of having mGFR less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 more than 2%.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7271.</p>","PeriodicalId":14610,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":"54-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measured GFR in Donor Selection, to Do or Not to Do? That is the Question.\",\"authors\":\"Shiva Samavat,&nbsp;Homa Masrour,&nbsp;Azadeh Ahmadikoomleh,&nbsp;Ali Reza Khoshdel,&nbsp;Mohsen Nafar,&nbsp;Nooshin Dalili,&nbsp;Ahmad Firouzan,&nbsp;Fatemeh Poorrezagholi,&nbsp;Fariba Samadian,&nbsp;Samaneh Hoseinzadeh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The accurate assessment of the pre-donation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a crucial step in donor selection. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to identify the best equation to estimate GFR and the necessity of a radio-nuclear scan in GFR evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 154 potential donors were enrolled, and GFR equations (the MDRD study, the CKD-EPI study, and the full age spectrum [FAS]), and creatinine clearance were compared with measured GFR (mGFR) by the radio-nuclear method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study results indicate that Potential donors had an mGFR of 95.56 ± 15.57 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Though body surface area (BSA) adjusted full age spectrum (FAS) and CKD-EPI equations were most correlated with mGFR, the correlation coefficients were weak (ICC: 0.3 and 0.32, respectively). Misclassification at the cut-off of 80 cc/min/ 1.73 m2 was about 42% for both equations. Besides, 16.8% of donors with eGFR more than 80 cc/min/ 1.73 m2 had a difference in split renal function, and 57.1% of participants had a > 2% probability of having an mGFR < 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If the nuclear scan is easily available, we suggest measuring GFR by 99mTc -DTPA scan as the preferred method. Otherwise, our data suggest utilizing mGFR in patients with high body mass index, size asymmetry in CT-scan, eGFR less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with FAS and/or CKD-EPI equation as these factors deviated the estimated GFR, and also in those with inaccurate creatinine clearance measurements or with posttest probability of having mGFR less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 more than 2%.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7271.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian journal of kidney diseases\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"54-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian journal of kidney diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确评估捐献前肾小球滤过率(GFR)是选择供体的关键步骤。我们进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,以确定估计GFR的最佳方程和在GFR评估中进行放射性核扫描的必要性。方法:在本研究中,招募了154名潜在供体,并将GFR方程(MDRD研究、CKD-EPI研究和全年龄谱[FAS])和肌酐清除率与放射性核方法测量的GFR (mGFR)进行比较。结果:潜在献血者的mGFR为95.56±15.57 mL/min / 1.73 m2。虽然体表面积(BSA)调整的全年龄谱(FAS)和CKD-EPI方程与mGFR相关性最强,但相关系数较弱(ICC分别为0.3和0.32)。在80 cc/min/ 1.73 m2的临界值下,两个方程的误分类率约为42%。此外,16.8%的eGFR大于80cc /min/ 1.73 m2的供者有分裂肾功能的差异,57.1%的参与者有> 2%的概率mGFR < 90ml /min/ 1.73 m2。结论:如果核扫描容易获得,我们建议用99mTc -DTPA扫描测量GFR作为首选方法。否则,我们的数据建议在高体重指数、ct扫描尺寸不对称、FAS和/或CKD-EPI方程中eGFR小于90 mL/min / 1.73 m2的患者中使用mGFR,因为这些因素偏离了估计的GFR,以及在肌酐清除率测量不准确或测试后mGFR小于90 mL/min / 1.73 m2的患者中使用mGFR。DOI: 10.52547 / ijkd.7271。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measured GFR in Donor Selection, to Do or Not to Do? That is the Question.

Introduction: The accurate assessment of the pre-donation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a crucial step in donor selection. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to identify the best equation to estimate GFR and the necessity of a radio-nuclear scan in GFR evaluation.

Methods: In this study, 154 potential donors were enrolled, and GFR equations (the MDRD study, the CKD-EPI study, and the full age spectrum [FAS]), and creatinine clearance were compared with measured GFR (mGFR) by the radio-nuclear method.

Results: The study results indicate that Potential donors had an mGFR of 95.56 ± 15.57 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Though body surface area (BSA) adjusted full age spectrum (FAS) and CKD-EPI equations were most correlated with mGFR, the correlation coefficients were weak (ICC: 0.3 and 0.32, respectively). Misclassification at the cut-off of 80 cc/min/ 1.73 m2 was about 42% for both equations. Besides, 16.8% of donors with eGFR more than 80 cc/min/ 1.73 m2 had a difference in split renal function, and 57.1% of participants had a > 2% probability of having an mGFR < 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Conclusion: If the nuclear scan is easily available, we suggest measuring GFR by 99mTc -DTPA scan as the preferred method. Otherwise, our data suggest utilizing mGFR in patients with high body mass index, size asymmetry in CT-scan, eGFR less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with FAS and/or CKD-EPI equation as these factors deviated the estimated GFR, and also in those with inaccurate creatinine clearance measurements or with posttest probability of having mGFR less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 more than 2%.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7271.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian journal of kidney diseases
Iranian journal of kidney diseases UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases (IJKD), a peer-reviewed journal in English, is the official publication of the Iranian Society of Nephrology. The aim of the IJKD is the worldwide reflection of the knowledge produced by the scientists and clinicians in nephrology. Published quarterly, the IJKD provides a new platform for advancement of the field. The journal’s objective is to serve as a focal point for debates and exchange of knowledge and experience among researchers in a global context. Original papers, case reports, and invited reviews on all aspects of the kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis, and transplantation will be covered by the IJKD. Research on the basic science, clinical practice, and socio-economics of renal health are all welcomed by the editors of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信