天然产物中潜在神经保护化合物的分析方法和局限性

John T. Weber
{"title":"天然产物中潜在神经保护化合物的分析方法和局限性","authors":"John T. Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.nhtm.2015.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Plant-derived polyphenols have attracted the attention of scientists, the public, and the media due to their potential use as nutraceutical products. The high quantities of polyphenols found in some berry species, </span><span><em>e.g. </em><em>Vaccinium</em></span><span> species such as blueberries and lingonberries, and their reported antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, could be beneficial for brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders<span>. The neuroprotective<span> potential of various polyphenolic compounds have been validated using a variety of </span></span></span><em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em> techniques. Both <em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em> methodologies have their respective advantages and disadvantages, including, but not limited to, cost, time, use of resources and technical limitations. For example, <em>in vivo</em> studies can better evaluate the effects of protective compounds and/or their metabolites on various tissues, including the brain, whereas <em>in vitro</em><span> studies can better discern the cellular and/or mechanistic effects of compounds. This short review is meant to provide a synopsis of some of the inherent benefits and drawbacks of methods used for assessing neuroprotection and how findings may translate to the human population, particularly related to my specific area of research analyzing the potential neuroprotective effects of berries and their associated polyphenolic compounds.</span></p></div><div><h3>Focal points</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Benchside</p><p>Both <em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em> experimental approaches are necessary to determine the full potential that berries and their constituents hold for treating and preventing neurological diseases and syndromes.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Bedside</p><p>Ingestion<span> of compounds from berries may reduce the amount and severity of neurodegenerative diseases, thereby providing a form of translational preventative medicine.</span></p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Industry</p><p>Neuroprotective compounds from berries, including both the fruits and leaves, hold potential as nutraceutical products.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Community</p><p>The development of nutraceutical products with neuroprotective potential by industry could provide local economic benefits.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Regulatory agencies</p><p>As nutraceutical products are produced from the fruits and leaves of berries, care will need to be taken on labeling as well as claims made by the manufacturers.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":90660,"journal":{"name":"New horizons in translational medicine","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 81-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nhtm.2015.01.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodologies and limitations in the analysis of potential neuroprotective compounds derived from natural products\",\"authors\":\"John T. Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nhtm.2015.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Plant-derived polyphenols have attracted the attention of scientists, the public, and the media due to their potential use as nutraceutical products. The high quantities of polyphenols found in some berry species, </span><span><em>e.g. </em><em>Vaccinium</em></span><span> species such as blueberries and lingonberries, and their reported antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, could be beneficial for brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders<span>. The neuroprotective<span> potential of various polyphenolic compounds have been validated using a variety of </span></span></span><em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em> techniques. Both <em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em> methodologies have their respective advantages and disadvantages, including, but not limited to, cost, time, use of resources and technical limitations. For example, <em>in vivo</em> studies can better evaluate the effects of protective compounds and/or their metabolites on various tissues, including the brain, whereas <em>in vitro</em><span> studies can better discern the cellular and/or mechanistic effects of compounds. This short review is meant to provide a synopsis of some of the inherent benefits and drawbacks of methods used for assessing neuroprotection and how findings may translate to the human population, particularly related to my specific area of research analyzing the potential neuroprotective effects of berries and their associated polyphenolic compounds.</span></p></div><div><h3>Focal points</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Benchside</p><p>Both <em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em> experimental approaches are necessary to determine the full potential that berries and their constituents hold for treating and preventing neurological diseases and syndromes.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Bedside</p><p>Ingestion<span> of compounds from berries may reduce the amount and severity of neurodegenerative diseases, thereby providing a form of translational preventative medicine.</span></p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Industry</p><p>Neuroprotective compounds from berries, including both the fruits and leaves, hold potential as nutraceutical products.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Community</p><p>The development of nutraceutical products with neuroprotective potential by industry could provide local economic benefits.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Regulatory agencies</p><p>As nutraceutical products are produced from the fruits and leaves of berries, care will need to be taken on labeling as well as claims made by the manufacturers.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New horizons in translational medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 81-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nhtm.2015.01.001\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New horizons in translational medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307502315000028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New horizons in translational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307502315000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

植物源性多酚因其作为营养保健品的潜在用途而引起了科学家、公众和媒体的注意。在一些浆果物种中发现的大量多酚,如蓝莓和越橘,以及它们报道的抗氧化和抗炎特性,可能对大脑衰老和神经退行性疾病有益。各种多酚化合物的神经保护潜力已经通过各种体内和体外技术得到验证。体内和体外方法都有各自的优点和缺点,包括但不限于成本、时间、资源使用和技术限制。例如,体内研究可以更好地评估保护性化合物和/或其代谢物对各种组织(包括大脑)的作用,而体外研究可以更好地辨别化合物的细胞和/或机制作用。这篇简短的综述旨在简要介绍用于评估神经保护作用的方法的一些固有优点和缺点,以及研究结果如何转化为人类,特别是与我的研究领域有关,分析浆果及其相关的多酚化合物的潜在神经保护作用。•benchside体内和体外实验方法都是必要的,以确定浆果及其成分在治疗和预防神经系统疾病和综合征方面的全部潜力。从浆果中摄取化合物可减少神经退行性疾病的数量和严重程度,从而提供一种转化预防医学。•工业浆果中的神经保护化合物,包括果实和叶子,有潜力成为营养保健品。•社区工业开发具有神经保护潜力的营养保健品可以为当地提供经济效益。由于营养保健品是由浆果的果实和叶子制成的,因此需要注意标签以及制造商的声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodologies and limitations in the analysis of potential neuroprotective compounds derived from natural products

Plant-derived polyphenols have attracted the attention of scientists, the public, and the media due to their potential use as nutraceutical products. The high quantities of polyphenols found in some berry species, e.g. Vaccinium species such as blueberries and lingonberries, and their reported antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, could be beneficial for brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders. The neuroprotective potential of various polyphenolic compounds have been validated using a variety of in vivo and in vitro techniques. Both in vivo and in vitro methodologies have their respective advantages and disadvantages, including, but not limited to, cost, time, use of resources and technical limitations. For example, in vivo studies can better evaluate the effects of protective compounds and/or their metabolites on various tissues, including the brain, whereas in vitro studies can better discern the cellular and/or mechanistic effects of compounds. This short review is meant to provide a synopsis of some of the inherent benefits and drawbacks of methods used for assessing neuroprotection and how findings may translate to the human population, particularly related to my specific area of research analyzing the potential neuroprotective effects of berries and their associated polyphenolic compounds.

Focal points

  • Benchside

    Both in vivo and in vitro experimental approaches are necessary to determine the full potential that berries and their constituents hold for treating and preventing neurological diseases and syndromes.

  • Bedside

    Ingestion of compounds from berries may reduce the amount and severity of neurodegenerative diseases, thereby providing a form of translational preventative medicine.

  • Industry

    Neuroprotective compounds from berries, including both the fruits and leaves, hold potential as nutraceutical products.

  • Community

    The development of nutraceutical products with neuroprotective potential by industry could provide local economic benefits.

  • Regulatory agencies

    As nutraceutical products are produced from the fruits and leaves of berries, care will need to be taken on labeling as well as claims made by the manufacturers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信