日常技术使用问卷在日本语境下的验证

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Camilla Malinowsky , Anders Kottorp , Rumi Tanemura , Eric Asaba , Toru Nagao , Kazue Noda , Jiro Sagara , Peter Bontje , Lena Rosenberg , Louise Nygård
{"title":"日常技术使用问卷在日本语境下的验证","authors":"Camilla Malinowsky ,&nbsp;Anders Kottorp ,&nbsp;Rumi Tanemura ,&nbsp;Eric Asaba ,&nbsp;Toru Nagao ,&nbsp;Kazue Noda ,&nbsp;Jiro Sagara ,&nbsp;Peter Bontje ,&nbsp;Lena Rosenberg ,&nbsp;Louise Nygård","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Objective</h3><p>The Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ), which evaluates the perceived relevance of and the perceived ability in everyday technology (ET) use, has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in Swedish studies of older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the ETUQ in a Japanese context in older Japanese adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A sample of older Japanese adults (<em>n</em> = 164) including persons with (<em>n</em> = 32) and without (<em>n</em> = 132) cognitive impairment was interviewed with the ETUQ, including original items (ETs) and added Japanese context-specific items. Data were analyzed using a Rasch measurement model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis demonstrated acceptable functioning of the rating scale, internal scale validity, person response validity, and person-separation reliability of the Japanese ETUQ according to the Rasch model. However, evidence supporting unidimensionality in the Japanese ETUQ was not consistent in this sample. The added Japanese items did not significantly change the estimated individual person measures of perceived ability to use ET.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Japanese ETUQ seems to be a sensitive tool to evaluate perceived ability in ET use among elderly people in Japan with and without cognitive impairment. Therefore, it could be used in research and clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.002","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire in a Japanese context\",\"authors\":\"Camilla Malinowsky ,&nbsp;Anders Kottorp ,&nbsp;Rumi Tanemura ,&nbsp;Eric Asaba ,&nbsp;Toru Nagao ,&nbsp;Kazue Noda ,&nbsp;Jiro Sagara ,&nbsp;Peter Bontje ,&nbsp;Lena Rosenberg ,&nbsp;Louise Nygård\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/Objective</h3><p>The Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ), which evaluates the perceived relevance of and the perceived ability in everyday technology (ET) use, has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in Swedish studies of older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the ETUQ in a Japanese context in older Japanese adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A sample of older Japanese adults (<em>n</em> = 164) including persons with (<em>n</em> = 32) and without (<em>n</em> = 132) cognitive impairment was interviewed with the ETUQ, including original items (ETs) and added Japanese context-specific items. Data were analyzed using a Rasch measurement model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis demonstrated acceptable functioning of the rating scale, internal scale validity, person response validity, and person-separation reliability of the Japanese ETUQ according to the Rasch model. However, evidence supporting unidimensionality in the Japanese ETUQ was not consistent in this sample. The added Japanese items did not significantly change the estimated individual person measures of perceived ability to use ET.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Japanese ETUQ seems to be a sensitive tool to evaluate perceived ability in ET use among elderly people in Japan with and without cognitive impairment. Therefore, it could be used in research and clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.002\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186115000261\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186115000261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

背景/目的日常技术使用问卷(ETUQ)评估日常技术(ET)使用的感知相关性和感知能力,在瑞典老年人的研究中已经证明了可接受的心理测量特性。本研究的目的是在日本老年人中检验ETUQ的可靠性和有效性。方法对日本老年人(n = 164)进行ETUQ访谈,其中有认知障碍者(n = 32)和无认知障碍者(n = 132),包括原始项目(ETs)和增加的日语情境特定项目。采用Rasch测量模型对数据进行分析。结果根据Rasch模型,日本ETUQ量表的评定量表、内部效度、人反应效度和人分离信度具有可接受的功能。然而,支持日本ETUQ单维性的证据在本样本中并不一致。增加的日语项目对估计的个人感知ET使用能力没有显著的改变。结论日语ETUQ似乎是评估日本有或无认知障碍老年人感知ET使用能力的敏感工具。因此,它可以用于研究和临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire in a Japanese context

Background/Objective

The Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ), which evaluates the perceived relevance of and the perceived ability in everyday technology (ET) use, has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in Swedish studies of older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the ETUQ in a Japanese context in older Japanese adults.

Methods

A sample of older Japanese adults (n = 164) including persons with (n = 32) and without (n = 132) cognitive impairment was interviewed with the ETUQ, including original items (ETs) and added Japanese context-specific items. Data were analyzed using a Rasch measurement model.

Results

The analysis demonstrated acceptable functioning of the rating scale, internal scale validity, person response validity, and person-separation reliability of the Japanese ETUQ according to the Rasch model. However, evidence supporting unidimensionality in the Japanese ETUQ was not consistent in this sample. The added Japanese items did not significantly change the estimated individual person measures of perceived ability to use ET.

Conclusion

The Japanese ETUQ seems to be a sensitive tool to evaluate perceived ability in ET use among elderly people in Japan with and without cognitive impairment. Therefore, it could be used in research and clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信