青蒿琥酯与奎宁在重症监护病房治疗重症疟疾成人患者中的比较:一项回顾性观察性研究。

R M Mathiba, L R Mathivha, G D Nethathe
{"title":"青蒿琥酯与奎宁在重症监护病房治疗重症疟疾成人患者中的比较:一项回顾性观察性研究。","authors":"R M Mathiba,&nbsp;L R Mathivha,&nbsp;G D Nethathe","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1.345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited South African data on the outcomes of patients with severe malaria treated with quinine compared with those treated with artesunate in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the outcomes of adult patients treated with artesunate against those treated with quinine in the ICU. Primary outcome variables are length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and mortality. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes and neurological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with severe malaria treated at a multidisciplinary ICU with artesunate or quinine from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 92 patients included in the study, 63 (69.2%) were male. The mean age in the quinine and artesunate groups was 36.2 years and 40.5 years, respectively (p=0.071). Most (98.6%) of the patients with a positive travel history had visited a malaria-endemic region. Of the 53 patients tested for HIV infection, 71.7% tested positive (p=0.520). The average CD4+ cell count of HIV-positive patients treated with quinine was 200 cells/µL compared with 217.17 cells/µL for those treated with artesunate (p=0.875). The mean APACHE II score at admission was 20.85 and 19.62 in the quinine group and artesunate group, respectively (p=0.380). The median LOS was 5 days (range 1 - 27). Mortality was 15.4% in the quinine group and 7.7% in the artesunate group (p=0.246).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A statistically insignificant mortality difference was observed in outcomes of the two treatment groups in this retrospective, single-centre cohort study.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>Intravenous artesunate is currently the preferred treatment in the management of patients with severe malaria. However, there are limited local data on the outcomes of artesunate v. quinine therapy for the management of severe malaria in highly monitored clinical environments in non-endemic regions of South Africa.We describe clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with severe malaria treated with quinine and those treated with artesunate in the ICU in a non-endemic region.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1.345","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artesunate compared with quinine for the treatment of severe malaria in adult patients managed in an intensive care unit: A retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"R M Mathiba,&nbsp;L R Mathivha,&nbsp;G D Nethathe\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1.345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited South African data on the outcomes of patients with severe malaria treated with quinine compared with those treated with artesunate in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the outcomes of adult patients treated with artesunate against those treated with quinine in the ICU. Primary outcome variables are length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and mortality. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes and neurological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with severe malaria treated at a multidisciplinary ICU with artesunate or quinine from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 92 patients included in the study, 63 (69.2%) were male. The mean age in the quinine and artesunate groups was 36.2 years and 40.5 years, respectively (p=0.071). Most (98.6%) of the patients with a positive travel history had visited a malaria-endemic region. Of the 53 patients tested for HIV infection, 71.7% tested positive (p=0.520). The average CD4+ cell count of HIV-positive patients treated with quinine was 200 cells/µL compared with 217.17 cells/µL for those treated with artesunate (p=0.875). The mean APACHE II score at admission was 20.85 and 19.62 in the quinine group and artesunate group, respectively (p=0.380). The median LOS was 5 days (range 1 - 27). Mortality was 15.4% in the quinine group and 7.7% in the artesunate group (p=0.246).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A statistically insignificant mortality difference was observed in outcomes of the two treatment groups in this retrospective, single-centre cohort study.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>Intravenous artesunate is currently the preferred treatment in the management of patients with severe malaria. However, there are limited local data on the outcomes of artesunate v. quinine therapy for the management of severe malaria in highly monitored clinical environments in non-endemic regions of South Africa.We describe clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with severe malaria treated with quinine and those treated with artesunate in the ICU in a non-endemic region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1.345\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1.345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1.345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:南非关于重症监护病房(ICU)重症疟疾患者用奎宁治疗与用青蒿琥酯治疗的结果的数据有限。目的:比较ICU成人患者使用青蒿琥酯治疗与使用奎宁治疗的结果。主要结局变量是ICU的住院时间(LOS)和死亡率。次要结局包括低血糖发作的发生率和神经预后。方法:对2008年1月1日至2012年12月31日在多学科ICU接受青蒿琥酯或奎宁治疗的重症疟疾患者进行回顾性队列研究。结果:纳入研究的92例患者中,男性63例(69.2%)。奎宁组和青蒿素组的平均年龄分别为36.2岁和40.5岁(p=0.071)。绝大多数(98.6%)有旅行史的患者曾去过疟疾流行地区。在53例HIV感染检测中,71.7%呈阳性(p=0.520)。接受奎宁治疗的hiv阳性患者的平均CD4+细胞计数为200个细胞/µL,而接受青蒿琥酯治疗的患者的平均CD4+细胞计数为217.17个细胞/µL (p=0.875)。入院时,奎宁组和青蒿素组的APACHEⅱ平均评分分别为20.85分和19.62分(p=0.380)。平均生存期为5天(范围1 - 27天)。奎宁组死亡率为15.4%,青蒿琥酯组为7.7% (p=0.246)。结论:在这项回顾性的单中心队列研究中,观察到两个治疗组的结果在统计学上没有显著的死亡率差异。研究贡献:静脉注射青蒿琥酯是目前治疗重症疟疾患者的首选治疗方法。然而,在南非非疟疾流行地区高度监测的临床环境中,关于青蒿琥酯与奎宁治疗重症疟疾管理的结果的当地数据有限。我们描述了重症疟疾患者在非疟疾流行地区的ICU用奎宁治疗和用青蒿琥酯治疗的临床特征、管理和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artesunate compared with quinine for the treatment of severe malaria in adult patients managed in an intensive care unit: A retrospective observational study.

Artesunate compared with quinine for the treatment of severe malaria in adult patients managed in an intensive care unit: A retrospective observational study.

Background: There are limited South African data on the outcomes of patients with severe malaria treated with quinine compared with those treated with artesunate in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of adult patients treated with artesunate against those treated with quinine in the ICU. Primary outcome variables are length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and mortality. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes and neurological outcomes.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with severe malaria treated at a multidisciplinary ICU with artesunate or quinine from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2012.

Results: Of the 92 patients included in the study, 63 (69.2%) were male. The mean age in the quinine and artesunate groups was 36.2 years and 40.5 years, respectively (p=0.071). Most (98.6%) of the patients with a positive travel history had visited a malaria-endemic region. Of the 53 patients tested for HIV infection, 71.7% tested positive (p=0.520). The average CD4+ cell count of HIV-positive patients treated with quinine was 200 cells/µL compared with 217.17 cells/µL for those treated with artesunate (p=0.875). The mean APACHE II score at admission was 20.85 and 19.62 in the quinine group and artesunate group, respectively (p=0.380). The median LOS was 5 days (range 1 - 27). Mortality was 15.4% in the quinine group and 7.7% in the artesunate group (p=0.246).

Conclusion: A statistically insignificant mortality difference was observed in outcomes of the two treatment groups in this retrospective, single-centre cohort study.

Contributions of the study: Intravenous artesunate is currently the preferred treatment in the management of patients with severe malaria. However, there are limited local data on the outcomes of artesunate v. quinine therapy for the management of severe malaria in highly monitored clinical environments in non-endemic regions of South Africa.We describe clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with severe malaria treated with quinine and those treated with artesunate in the ICU in a non-endemic region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信