展示了堆肥样,颗粒粪便污泥强烈影响其在城郊自给农业中使用的可接受性

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Heather Roxburgh , Kate Hampshire , Elizabeth A Tilley , David M Oliver , Richard S Quilliam
{"title":"展示了堆肥样,颗粒粪便污泥强烈影响其在城郊自给农业中使用的可接受性","authors":"Heather Roxburgh ,&nbsp;Kate Hampshire ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Tilley ,&nbsp;David M Oliver ,&nbsp;Richard S Quilliam","doi":"10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using human excreta derived fertiliser (HEDF) in agriculture reduces dependence on diminishing phosphorus rock reserves, improves soil health, and facilitates sustainable nutrient recycling. Such schemes have particular scope for expansion in peri-urban areas of low-income countries, where large quantities of faecal sludge from on-site sanitation systems are available. However, public acceptability is a critical unknown factor. This study used surveys of 534 peri-urban subsistence farmers in Blantyre, Malawi, to investigate the public acceptability of HEDF. Two factors are highlighted as having a particularly strong association with acceptability: showing a sample of composted, granulated faecal sludge to participants at the start of the survey, and having heard of HEDF before. For instance, almost all participants who were shown the composted, granulated sample and had prior knowledge of HEDF were willing to buy maize grown in HEDF (96%). Conversely, less than a third of participants who had not heard of HEDF before and were not shown the composted, granulated sample were willing to do so (30%). Maize was the most widely accepted crop for use with HEDF, as there is perceived to be little contact between the edible parts and the ground. This suggests that HEDF has the potential to be widely accepted by subsistence maize farmers and the general public in Malawi. However, uptake rates could be substantially improved with public engagement campaigns involving demonstrations or samples of a visually appealing product, and by promoting the concept through channels such as farmer radio programmes or agricultural extension workers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36714,"journal":{"name":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100041","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Being shown samples of composted, granulated faecal sludge strongly influences acceptability of its use in peri-urban subsistence agriculture\",\"authors\":\"Heather Roxburgh ,&nbsp;Kate Hampshire ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Tilley ,&nbsp;David M Oliver ,&nbsp;Richard S Quilliam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using human excreta derived fertiliser (HEDF) in agriculture reduces dependence on diminishing phosphorus rock reserves, improves soil health, and facilitates sustainable nutrient recycling. Such schemes have particular scope for expansion in peri-urban areas of low-income countries, where large quantities of faecal sludge from on-site sanitation systems are available. However, public acceptability is a critical unknown factor. This study used surveys of 534 peri-urban subsistence farmers in Blantyre, Malawi, to investigate the public acceptability of HEDF. Two factors are highlighted as having a particularly strong association with acceptability: showing a sample of composted, granulated faecal sludge to participants at the start of the survey, and having heard of HEDF before. For instance, almost all participants who were shown the composted, granulated sample and had prior knowledge of HEDF were willing to buy maize grown in HEDF (96%). Conversely, less than a third of participants who had not heard of HEDF before and were not shown the composted, granulated sample were willing to do so (30%). Maize was the most widely accepted crop for use with HEDF, as there is perceived to be little contact between the edible parts and the ground. This suggests that HEDF has the potential to be widely accepted by subsistence maize farmers and the general public in Malawi. However, uptake rates could be substantially improved with public engagement campaigns involving demonstrations or samples of a visually appealing product, and by promoting the concept through channels such as farmer radio programmes or agricultural extension workers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100041\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590289X20300128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590289X20300128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在农业中使用人类排泄物衍生肥料(HEDF)减少了对日益减少的磷岩储量的依赖,改善了土壤健康,并促进了可持续的养分循环。这种计划在低收入国家的城郊地区特别有扩大的余地,因为那里有来自现场卫生系统的大量粪便污泥。然而,公众的接受程度是一个关键的未知因素。本研究对马拉维布兰太尔的534名城郊自给农民进行了调查,以调查公众对HEDF的接受程度。有两个因素被强调为与可接受性有特别强的联系:在调查开始时向参与者展示堆肥颗粒粪便污泥样本,以及之前听说过HEDF。例如,几乎所有看到堆肥颗粒样品并事先了解HEDF的参与者都愿意购买在HEDF中种植的玉米(96%)。相反,在没有听说过HEDF的参与者中,只有不到三分之一的人愿意这样做(30%)。玉米是最被广泛接受用于HEDF的作物,因为人们认为玉米的可食用部分与地面之间几乎没有接触。这表明HEDF有可能被马拉维的自给玉米农民和普通公众广泛接受。但是,通过公众参与运动,包括展示或展示具有视觉吸引力的产品样品,以及通过农民广播节目或农业推广人员等渠道宣传这一概念,可以大大提高接受率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Being shown samples of composted, granulated faecal sludge strongly influences acceptability of its use in peri-urban subsistence agriculture

Using human excreta derived fertiliser (HEDF) in agriculture reduces dependence on diminishing phosphorus rock reserves, improves soil health, and facilitates sustainable nutrient recycling. Such schemes have particular scope for expansion in peri-urban areas of low-income countries, where large quantities of faecal sludge from on-site sanitation systems are available. However, public acceptability is a critical unknown factor. This study used surveys of 534 peri-urban subsistence farmers in Blantyre, Malawi, to investigate the public acceptability of HEDF. Two factors are highlighted as having a particularly strong association with acceptability: showing a sample of composted, granulated faecal sludge to participants at the start of the survey, and having heard of HEDF before. For instance, almost all participants who were shown the composted, granulated sample and had prior knowledge of HEDF were willing to buy maize grown in HEDF (96%). Conversely, less than a third of participants who had not heard of HEDF before and were not shown the composted, granulated sample were willing to do so (30%). Maize was the most widely accepted crop for use with HEDF, as there is perceived to be little contact between the edible parts and the ground. This suggests that HEDF has the potential to be widely accepted by subsistence maize farmers and the general public in Malawi. However, uptake rates could be substantially improved with public engagement campaigns involving demonstrations or samples of a visually appealing product, and by promoting the concept through channels such as farmer radio programmes or agricultural extension workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信