护士使用novofine®autocover®安全针刺伤的风险和护士对针的满意度:NOVAC研究

Odile Lautier IDE, Helen Mosnier-Pudar MD, Danielle Durain IDE, Sophie Gonbert MD, PhD, Luminita Spinu MD, PhD, Pierre Faure DPharm
{"title":"护士使用novofine®autocover®安全针刺伤的风险和护士对针的满意度:NOVAC研究","authors":"Odile Lautier IDE,&nbsp;Helen Mosnier-Pudar MD,&nbsp;Danielle Durain IDE,&nbsp;Sophie Gonbert MD, PhD,&nbsp;Luminita Spinu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Pierre Faure DPharm","doi":"10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80051-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Needlestick injuries among health care professionals are a costly problem, both economically and in terms of anxiety and stress. NovoFine® Autocover® (NFA) 30G safety needles (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) were designed to minimize the risk of such injuries when used with insulin pens, which are increasingly preferred over syringes for injecting insulin.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> This prospective study compared the risk of needlestick injury with NFA needles and regular needles on insulin pens among nurses who administered insulin to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Nurses with ≥3 months' experience in diabetes care were eligible for participation. Nurses were trained in the use of NFA needles and then instructed to use them in their daily practice for 4 weeks, recording details of the injections administered and any injuries that occurred in a logbook.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 143 nurses at 52 hospitals located throughout France received training. Demographic data were available for 139 nurses (mean age 38.4 years, 96.4% female, with a mean of 8 years' diabetes experience): 123 of the nurses used NFA needles (7854 injections administered), 122 of whom also used regular needles (4491 injections). No needlestick injuries occurred with NFA needles, whereas 1 needlestick injury occurred with a regular needle. Nurses were very satisfied with the NFA needles, giving them a score of 8.1 on a scale of 0 to 10, rating personal safety as a particularly important benefit (score 9.5). Nurses preferred NFA needles to both regular needles on insulin pens and needles on syringes, citing personal safety and the saving of time as the main reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> These results suggest that NFA needles could reduce the risk of needlestick injuries and that nurses would welcome their other advantages, such as ease of use and saving of time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100678,"journal":{"name":"Insulin","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 232-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80051-6","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of needlestick injuries among nurses using novofine® autocover® safety needles and nurses' satisfaction with the needles: The NOVAC Study\",\"authors\":\"Odile Lautier IDE,&nbsp;Helen Mosnier-Pudar MD,&nbsp;Danielle Durain IDE,&nbsp;Sophie Gonbert MD, PhD,&nbsp;Luminita Spinu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Pierre Faure DPharm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80051-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Needlestick injuries among health care professionals are a costly problem, both economically and in terms of anxiety and stress. NovoFine® Autocover® (NFA) 30G safety needles (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) were designed to minimize the risk of such injuries when used with insulin pens, which are increasingly preferred over syringes for injecting insulin.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> This prospective study compared the risk of needlestick injury with NFA needles and regular needles on insulin pens among nurses who administered insulin to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Nurses with ≥3 months' experience in diabetes care were eligible for participation. Nurses were trained in the use of NFA needles and then instructed to use them in their daily practice for 4 weeks, recording details of the injections administered and any injuries that occurred in a logbook.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 143 nurses at 52 hospitals located throughout France received training. Demographic data were available for 139 nurses (mean age 38.4 years, 96.4% female, with a mean of 8 years' diabetes experience): 123 of the nurses used NFA needles (7854 injections administered), 122 of whom also used regular needles (4491 injections). No needlestick injuries occurred with NFA needles, whereas 1 needlestick injury occurred with a regular needle. Nurses were very satisfied with the NFA needles, giving them a score of 8.1 on a scale of 0 to 10, rating personal safety as a particularly important benefit (score 9.5). Nurses preferred NFA needles to both regular needles on insulin pens and needles on syringes, citing personal safety and the saving of time as the main reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> These results suggest that NFA needles could reduce the risk of needlestick injuries and that nurses would welcome their other advantages, such as ease of use and saving of time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insulin\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 232-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80051-6\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insulin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557084308800516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insulin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557084308800516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景:在卫生保健专业人员中,针刺伤害是一个代价高昂的问题,无论是在经济上还是在焦虑和压力方面。NovoFine®Autocover®(NFA) 30G安全针头(Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark)设计用于在与胰岛素笔一起使用时将此类伤害的风险降至最低,胰岛素笔在注射胰岛素时越来越受欢迎,而不是注射器。目的:本前瞻性研究比较在给病人注射胰岛素的护士中,NFA针和普通针对胰岛素笔的针伤风险。方法:具有3个月以上糖尿病护理经验的护士参与研究。对护士进行NFA针头的使用培训,然后指导他们在4周的日常实践中使用NFA针头,并在日志中记录注射的细节和发生的任何伤害。结果:法国52家医院共有143名护士接受了培训。139名护士(平均年龄38.4岁,96.4%为女性,平均有8年糖尿病经历)的人口统计数据:123名护士使用NFA针头(7854次注射),其中122名护士也使用常规针头(4491次注射)。使用NFA针无针刺伤发生,而使用普通针有1例针刺伤发生。护士对NFA针头非常满意,在0到10的范围内给它们打了8.1分,将个人安全列为特别重要的好处(得分9.5)。与胰岛素笔上的普通针头和注射器上的针头相比,护士更喜欢使用NFA针头,理由是个人安全和节省时间。结论:这些结果表明,NFA针可以降低针刺伤的风险,并且护士会欢迎它的其他优点,如易于使用和节省时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of needlestick injuries among nurses using novofine® autocover® safety needles and nurses' satisfaction with the needles: The NOVAC Study

Background: Needlestick injuries among health care professionals are a costly problem, both economically and in terms of anxiety and stress. NovoFine® Autocover® (NFA) 30G safety needles (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) were designed to minimize the risk of such injuries when used with insulin pens, which are increasingly preferred over syringes for injecting insulin.

Objective: This prospective study compared the risk of needlestick injury with NFA needles and regular needles on insulin pens among nurses who administered insulin to patients.

Methods: Nurses with ≥3 months' experience in diabetes care were eligible for participation. Nurses were trained in the use of NFA needles and then instructed to use them in their daily practice for 4 weeks, recording details of the injections administered and any injuries that occurred in a logbook.

Results: A total of 143 nurses at 52 hospitals located throughout France received training. Demographic data were available for 139 nurses (mean age 38.4 years, 96.4% female, with a mean of 8 years' diabetes experience): 123 of the nurses used NFA needles (7854 injections administered), 122 of whom also used regular needles (4491 injections). No needlestick injuries occurred with NFA needles, whereas 1 needlestick injury occurred with a regular needle. Nurses were very satisfied with the NFA needles, giving them a score of 8.1 on a scale of 0 to 10, rating personal safety as a particularly important benefit (score 9.5). Nurses preferred NFA needles to both regular needles on insulin pens and needles on syringes, citing personal safety and the saving of time as the main reasons.

Conclusions: These results suggest that NFA needles could reduce the risk of needlestick injuries and that nurses would welcome their other advantages, such as ease of use and saving of time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信