Sagar C. Saha, Arunik Sanyal, Ramendra K. Kundu, Syamalima Dube , Dipak K. Dube
{"title":"黄麻病原菌中两种细胞外β-葡萄糖苷酶的纯化及特性研究","authors":"Sagar C. Saha, Arunik Sanyal, Ramendra K. Kundu, Syamalima Dube , Dipak K. Dube","doi":"10.1016/0005-2744(81)90218-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two forms of β-glucosidase (β-<span>d</span>-glucoside glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.21) from the culture filtrate of <em>Macrophomina phaseolina</em> were separated and partially purified by (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> precipitation, ion-exchange chromatography (DE-52) and gel filtration. The final preparation was purified 103-fold and 88-fold for β-glucosidase-I and β-glucosidase-II, respectively. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified enzymes imparted a single band at pH 8.3. The two forms differ from each other with respect to molecular weight (323 600 for β-glucosidase I and 220 000 for β-glucosidase II)pH optima, temperature optima, electrophoretic mobility and substrate specificity. The two forms of β-glucosidase may also be differentiated by inhibition experiments using inhibitors like glucono-δ-lactone and nojirimycin. Of the two inhibitors tested nojirimycin is more potent for β-glucosidase-I than that for β-glucosidase-II. The energy of activation for the two enzymes is also different (12.02 kcal/mol for glucosidase I and 10.0 kcal/mol for glucosidase II).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100159,"journal":{"name":"Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology","volume":"662 1","pages":"Pages 22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0005-2744(81)90218-7","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purification and characterization of two forms of extracellular β-glucosidase from jute pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina\",\"authors\":\"Sagar C. Saha, Arunik Sanyal, Ramendra K. Kundu, Syamalima Dube , Dipak K. Dube\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0005-2744(81)90218-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two forms of β-glucosidase (β-<span>d</span>-glucoside glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.21) from the culture filtrate of <em>Macrophomina phaseolina</em> were separated and partially purified by (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> precipitation, ion-exchange chromatography (DE-52) and gel filtration. The final preparation was purified 103-fold and 88-fold for β-glucosidase-I and β-glucosidase-II, respectively. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified enzymes imparted a single band at pH 8.3. The two forms differ from each other with respect to molecular weight (323 600 for β-glucosidase I and 220 000 for β-glucosidase II)pH optima, temperature optima, electrophoretic mobility and substrate specificity. The two forms of β-glucosidase may also be differentiated by inhibition experiments using inhibitors like glucono-δ-lactone and nojirimycin. Of the two inhibitors tested nojirimycin is more potent for β-glucosidase-I than that for β-glucosidase-II. The energy of activation for the two enzymes is also different (12.02 kcal/mol for glucosidase I and 10.0 kcal/mol for glucosidase II).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology\",\"volume\":\"662 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 22-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0005-2744(81)90218-7\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0005274481902187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0005274481902187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Purification and characterization of two forms of extracellular β-glucosidase from jute pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina
Two forms of β-glucosidase (β-d-glucoside glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.21) from the culture filtrate of Macrophomina phaseolina were separated and partially purified by (NH4)2SO4 precipitation, ion-exchange chromatography (DE-52) and gel filtration. The final preparation was purified 103-fold and 88-fold for β-glucosidase-I and β-glucosidase-II, respectively. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified enzymes imparted a single band at pH 8.3. The two forms differ from each other with respect to molecular weight (323 600 for β-glucosidase I and 220 000 for β-glucosidase II)pH optima, temperature optima, electrophoretic mobility and substrate specificity. The two forms of β-glucosidase may also be differentiated by inhibition experiments using inhibitors like glucono-δ-lactone and nojirimycin. Of the two inhibitors tested nojirimycin is more potent for β-glucosidase-I than that for β-glucosidase-II. The energy of activation for the two enzymes is also different (12.02 kcal/mol for glucosidase I and 10.0 kcal/mol for glucosidase II).