杯子是半满的

Richard B. North
{"title":"杯子是半满的","authors":"Richard B. North","doi":"10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70008-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The “modern” criterion of 50% pain relief has long-standing precedents in the “ancient” literature. We agree that other measures of outcome, which reflect pain relief indirectly, are important, and accordingly for over two decades have routinely reported activities of daily living, return to work, patient satisfaction, need for additional treatment, and medication requirements. Physician and patient may deceive themselves (L. <em>fallax</em>, deceit) by undue reliance on any single outcome criterion. Relief of pain per se, however, is most relevant to the patient's presenting complaint, and however we choose to quantitate it, it is a sine qua non.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101001,"journal":{"name":"Pain Forum","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 195-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70008-5","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The glass is half full\",\"authors\":\"Richard B. North\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70008-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The “modern” criterion of 50% pain relief has long-standing precedents in the “ancient” literature. We agree that other measures of outcome, which reflect pain relief indirectly, are important, and accordingly for over two decades have routinely reported activities of daily living, return to work, patient satisfaction, need for additional treatment, and medication requirements. Physician and patient may deceive themselves (L. <em>fallax</em>, deceit) by undue reliance on any single outcome criterion. Relief of pain per se, however, is most relevant to the patient's presenting complaint, and however we choose to quantitate it, it is a sine qua non.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Forum\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 195-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70008-5\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1082317499700085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1082317499700085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

50%疼痛缓解的“现代”标准在“古代”文献中有长期的先例。我们同意间接反映疼痛缓解的其他结果测量是重要的,因此在20多年中,常规报告了日常生活活动、恢复工作、患者满意度、额外治疗需求和药物需求。医生和病人可能欺骗自己(L. fallax,欺骗)过度依赖任何单一的结果标准。然而,疼痛本身的缓解与患者的主诉最为相关,无论我们如何选择量化它,它都是一个必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The glass is half full

The “modern” criterion of 50% pain relief has long-standing precedents in the “ancient” literature. We agree that other measures of outcome, which reflect pain relief indirectly, are important, and accordingly for over two decades have routinely reported activities of daily living, return to work, patient satisfaction, need for additional treatment, and medication requirements. Physician and patient may deceive themselves (L. fallax, deceit) by undue reliance on any single outcome criterion. Relief of pain per se, however, is most relevant to the patient's presenting complaint, and however we choose to quantitate it, it is a sine qua non.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信