基质再生剂(Matrix regeneration agent, RGTA)在治疗持续性上皮缺损中发挥着重要作用

Tolga Kocatürk , Mustafa Alemdar , Özge Key , Harun Çakmak , José L. Güell
{"title":"基质再生剂(Matrix regeneration agent, RGTA)在治疗持续性上皮缺损中发挥着重要作用","authors":"Tolga Kocatürk ,&nbsp;Mustafa Alemdar ,&nbsp;Özge Key ,&nbsp;Harun Çakmak ,&nbsp;José L. Güell","doi":"10.1016/j.xjec.2020.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and speed of the regenerating agent (RGTA) in the management of persistent epithelial defects after severe infective keratitis, when the treatment with topical fortified antibiotics fails.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was performed on a noncomparative case series of 27 patients (27 eyes) referred with nonhealing severe infective keratitis, i.e. no signs of improvement with fortified antibiotics and ABS eye drops after at least 3 weeks of follow-up. The patients were treated with RGTA eye drops until the complete healing of epithelium. The main outcome measures for each patient were the duration of complete epithelialization of the corneal ulcer and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after the therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients did not report pain or discomfort during the RGTA therapy and had no local or systemic side effects related to RGTA application. The RGTA treatment increased BCVA and achieved complete epithelial healing in all patients within an average of 2.36 ± 1.64 weeks (range: 1–5.60). In a patient with necrotizing scleritis, full corneal epithelialization took relatively shorter time (1.5 week), but healing in the conjunctival region was still lacking. Corneal epithelial defect was repeated 4 weeks later. Thus, recurrence was a possibility and another patient with penetrating keratoplasty the revival was after 7 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RGTA treatment is a safe option for severe eye infection when local or systemic side effects are concerned. It restores the cornea to its original health within a few weeks of therapy when the conventional treatments of keratitis fail. The practice shortens the hospital stay and saves the cost even in refractory corneal ulcers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100782,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EuCornea","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.xjec.2020.03.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matrix regenerating agent (RGTA) plays a prominent role in treating persistent epithelial defects\",\"authors\":\"Tolga Kocatürk ,&nbsp;Mustafa Alemdar ,&nbsp;Özge Key ,&nbsp;Harun Çakmak ,&nbsp;José L. Güell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjec.2020.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and speed of the regenerating agent (RGTA) in the management of persistent epithelial defects after severe infective keratitis, when the treatment with topical fortified antibiotics fails.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was performed on a noncomparative case series of 27 patients (27 eyes) referred with nonhealing severe infective keratitis, i.e. no signs of improvement with fortified antibiotics and ABS eye drops after at least 3 weeks of follow-up. The patients were treated with RGTA eye drops until the complete healing of epithelium. The main outcome measures for each patient were the duration of complete epithelialization of the corneal ulcer and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after the therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients did not report pain or discomfort during the RGTA therapy and had no local or systemic side effects related to RGTA application. The RGTA treatment increased BCVA and achieved complete epithelial healing in all patients within an average of 2.36 ± 1.64 weeks (range: 1–5.60). In a patient with necrotizing scleritis, full corneal epithelialization took relatively shorter time (1.5 week), but healing in the conjunctival region was still lacking. Corneal epithelial defect was repeated 4 weeks later. Thus, recurrence was a possibility and another patient with penetrating keratoplasty the revival was after 7 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RGTA treatment is a safe option for severe eye infection when local or systemic side effects are concerned. It restores the cornea to its original health within a few weeks of therapy when the conventional treatments of keratitis fail. The practice shortens the hospital stay and saves the cost even in refractory corneal ulcers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of EuCornea\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 17-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.xjec.2020.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of EuCornea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452403420300054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EuCornea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452403420300054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价再生剂(RGTA)在外用强化抗生素治疗失败的情况下治疗严重感染性角膜炎后持续性上皮缺损的疗效、安全性和速度。方法:本研究采用27例(27只眼)严重感染性角膜炎未愈合的非对照病例系列,即在至少3周的随访后,强化抗生素和ABS滴眼液没有改善迹象。患者给予RGTA滴眼液治疗,直至上皮完全愈合。每位患者的主要结局指标是治疗前后角膜溃疡完全上皮化的持续时间和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。结果患者在RGTA治疗期间未报告疼痛或不适,并且没有与RGTA应用相关的局部或全身副作用。RGTA治疗增加了所有患者的BCVA,并在平均2.36±1.64周(范围:1-5.60周)内实现了上皮细胞的完全愈合。在坏死性巩膜炎患者中,完全角膜上皮化所需时间相对较短(1.5周),但结膜区域仍缺乏愈合。4周后再次出现角膜上皮缺损。因此,复发是可能的,另一例穿透性角膜移植术患者在7周后复发。结论rgta治疗严重眼部感染是一种安全的治疗方法。当角膜炎的常规治疗失败后,它能在几周内使角膜恢复到原来的健康状态。这种做法缩短了住院时间,甚至在难治性角膜溃疡中也节省了费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Matrix regenerating agent (RGTA) plays a prominent role in treating persistent epithelial defects

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and speed of the regenerating agent (RGTA) in the management of persistent epithelial defects after severe infective keratitis, when the treatment with topical fortified antibiotics fails.

Methods

The study was performed on a noncomparative case series of 27 patients (27 eyes) referred with nonhealing severe infective keratitis, i.e. no signs of improvement with fortified antibiotics and ABS eye drops after at least 3 weeks of follow-up. The patients were treated with RGTA eye drops until the complete healing of epithelium. The main outcome measures for each patient were the duration of complete epithelialization of the corneal ulcer and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after the therapy.

Results

Patients did not report pain or discomfort during the RGTA therapy and had no local or systemic side effects related to RGTA application. The RGTA treatment increased BCVA and achieved complete epithelial healing in all patients within an average of 2.36 ± 1.64 weeks (range: 1–5.60). In a patient with necrotizing scleritis, full corneal epithelialization took relatively shorter time (1.5 week), but healing in the conjunctival region was still lacking. Corneal epithelial defect was repeated 4 weeks later. Thus, recurrence was a possibility and another patient with penetrating keratoplasty the revival was after 7 weeks.

Conclusion

RGTA treatment is a safe option for severe eye infection when local or systemic side effects are concerned. It restores the cornea to its original health within a few weeks of therapy when the conventional treatments of keratitis fail. The practice shortens the hospital stay and saves the cost even in refractory corneal ulcers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信