{"title":"划分沟间飞溅和清洗动力学:一种新的实验室方法","authors":"Y. Wan , S.A. El-Swaify , R.A. Sutherland","doi":"10.1016/0933-3630(95)00035-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With an innovative experimental device simultaneous measurement of interrill splash and wash on an Oxisol was made at 4, 9, 18, 27, and 36% slopes under a constant rainfall intensity of 65 mm h<sup>−1</sup> in a laboratory setting. The specially designed runoff and sediment collection system provided a means of partitioning total splash into directional components (upslope, downslope, and lateral) and interrill sediment transport into wash and splash components. Results indicate that downslope and lateral splash components increased with slope while the upslope component decreased. Overall there was a linear increase of total splash from the 0.18 m<sup>2</sup> plot with increasing slope. A transport-limited regime prevailed in all studied slopes. The wash process dominated sediment transport at low slopes ( < 9%) and was linearly related to slope with a flux at the steady state ranging from 0.65 g m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 4% slope to 3.15 g m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 36% slope. Downslope splash transport was dominant at high slopes ( > 9%) and was best described with a power function model (exponent = 1.3) with a flux ranging from 0.33 g m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 4% slope to 5.31 g m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 36% slope. The WEPP interrill erosion model was inadequate in describing total interrill sediment delivery from the Oxisol. The practical implication of this finding was that splash can be an important process of sediment transport in interrill erosion. Failure to include splashed sediment in interrill erosion measurements using the common “runoff-trough” approach may underestimate total soil loss or interrill sediment delivery to rills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101170,"journal":{"name":"Soil Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 55-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0933-3630(95)00035-6","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partitioning interrill splash and wash dynamics: a novel laboratory approach\",\"authors\":\"Y. Wan , S.A. El-Swaify , R.A. Sutherland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0933-3630(95)00035-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With an innovative experimental device simultaneous measurement of interrill splash and wash on an Oxisol was made at 4, 9, 18, 27, and 36% slopes under a constant rainfall intensity of 65 mm h<sup>−1</sup> in a laboratory setting. The specially designed runoff and sediment collection system provided a means of partitioning total splash into directional components (upslope, downslope, and lateral) and interrill sediment transport into wash and splash components. Results indicate that downslope and lateral splash components increased with slope while the upslope component decreased. Overall there was a linear increase of total splash from the 0.18 m<sup>2</sup> plot with increasing slope. A transport-limited regime prevailed in all studied slopes. The wash process dominated sediment transport at low slopes ( < 9%) and was linearly related to slope with a flux at the steady state ranging from 0.65 g m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 4% slope to 3.15 g m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 36% slope. Downslope splash transport was dominant at high slopes ( > 9%) and was best described with a power function model (exponent = 1.3) with a flux ranging from 0.33 g m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 4% slope to 5.31 g m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 36% slope. The WEPP interrill erosion model was inadequate in describing total interrill sediment delivery from the Oxisol. The practical implication of this finding was that splash can be an important process of sediment transport in interrill erosion. Failure to include splashed sediment in interrill erosion measurements using the common “runoff-trough” approach may underestimate total soil loss or interrill sediment delivery to rills.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Technology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 55-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0933-3630(95)00035-6\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0933363095000356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0933363095000356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49
摘要
在实验室环境中,在恒定降雨强度为65 mm h - 1的条件下,在4、9、18、27和36%的坡度上,利用创新的实验装置同时测量Oxisol上的沟间飞溅和洗涤。特别设计的径流和沉积物收集系统提供了一种方法,将总溅溅划分为定向成分(上坡、下坡和侧向),并将细沟间沉积物输送为冲刷和溅溅成分。结果表明,坡下和侧向溅水分量随坡度增大而增大,而坡上溅水分量随坡度减小而减小。总的来说,从0.18 m2地块开始,随着坡度的增加,总飞溅量呈线性增加。在所有被研究的斜坡中,普遍存在运输受限的情况。冲刷过程主导了低坡度的输沙过程(<9%),与坡度呈线性关系,稳态通量范围为0.65 g m−2 min−1(4%坡度)至3.15 g m−2 min−1(36%坡度)。下坡溅溅在高坡上占主导地位(>9%),最好用幂函数模型(指数= 1.3)来描述,其通量范围从0.33 g m−2 min−1(斜率为4%)到5.31 g m−2 min−1(斜率为36%)。WEPP的沟间侵蚀模型在描述Oxisol的沟间沉积物总量方面是不充分的。这一发现的实际意义是,飞溅可能是沟间侵蚀中泥沙运移的一个重要过程。在使用常见的“径流槽”方法测量沟间侵蚀时,如果不包括溅沙,可能会低估总的土壤流失量或向沟间输送的沉积物。
Partitioning interrill splash and wash dynamics: a novel laboratory approach
With an innovative experimental device simultaneous measurement of interrill splash and wash on an Oxisol was made at 4, 9, 18, 27, and 36% slopes under a constant rainfall intensity of 65 mm h−1 in a laboratory setting. The specially designed runoff and sediment collection system provided a means of partitioning total splash into directional components (upslope, downslope, and lateral) and interrill sediment transport into wash and splash components. Results indicate that downslope and lateral splash components increased with slope while the upslope component decreased. Overall there was a linear increase of total splash from the 0.18 m2 plot with increasing slope. A transport-limited regime prevailed in all studied slopes. The wash process dominated sediment transport at low slopes ( < 9%) and was linearly related to slope with a flux at the steady state ranging from 0.65 g m−2 min−1 at 4% slope to 3.15 g m−2 min−1 at 36% slope. Downslope splash transport was dominant at high slopes ( > 9%) and was best described with a power function model (exponent = 1.3) with a flux ranging from 0.33 g m−2 min−1 at 4% slope to 5.31 g m−2 min−1 at 36% slope. The WEPP interrill erosion model was inadequate in describing total interrill sediment delivery from the Oxisol. The practical implication of this finding was that splash can be an important process of sediment transport in interrill erosion. Failure to include splashed sediment in interrill erosion measurements using the common “runoff-trough” approach may underestimate total soil loss or interrill sediment delivery to rills.